Suppr超能文献

辅助结肠镜插入的注水法:一位经验丰富的结肠镜检查医师的学习曲线

The water method for aiding colonoscope insertion: the learning curve of an experienced colonoscopist.

作者信息

Ramirez Francisco C, Leung Felix W

机构信息

Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, AZ, USA.

出版信息

J Interv Gastroenterol. 2011 Jul;1(3):97-101. doi: 10.4161/jig.1.3.18507. Epub 2011 Jul 1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The water method has promising features for colonoscopy but the learning curve to master the technique is unknown. AIMS: To describe the learning phase, and pitfalls of the water method and its impact on procedural outcomes by an experienced colonoscopist. DESIGN: Review of prospectively collected data in a performance improvement project SETTING: endoscopy Unit at a VA medical center PATIENTS: 200 consecutive veterans undergoing colonoscopy METHODS: An experienced colonoscopist examined 4 consecutive groups of 25 patients each using the water method to define the learning curve. Outcomes were compared to a historical cohort (n=100) examined by the same colonoscopist using usual air insufflation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Intent-to-treat (ITT) cecal intubation rate. RESULTS: ITT cecal intubation rate increased from 76% (first) to 96% (fourth quartile). Cecal intubation time in the first 2 quartiles was significantly longer (8.9±1.0 and 8.2±0.8 min, respectively) than that in the historical cohort (5.8±0.4 min) but decreased and became comparable to control values in the next 2 quartiles (7.2±0.9 and 6.6±0.6 min, respectively). Overall adenoma detection rate as a group (55%), compared favorably to the historical cohort (46%). CONCLUSIONS: The water method is relatively easy to learn for an experienced colonoscopist. Mastery of the method resulted in cecal intubation rate and overall adenoma detection rate meeting quality performance standards.

摘要

背景

水灌肠法在结肠镜检查中具有潜在优势,但掌握该技术的学习曲线尚不清楚。

目的

由一位经验丰富的结肠镜检查医师描述水灌肠法的学习阶段、陷阱及其对操作结果的影响。

设计

回顾在一项绩效改进项目中前瞻性收集的数据

地点

一家退伍军人医疗中心的内镜科

患者

200例连续接受结肠镜检查的退伍军人

方法

一位经验丰富的结肠镜检查医师使用水灌肠法对连续4组患者进行检查,每组25例,以确定学习曲线。将结果与同一结肠镜检查医师使用常规空气充气法检查的历史队列(n = 100)进行比较。

主要观察指标

意向性治疗(ITT)盲肠插管率。

结果

ITT盲肠插管率从第一组的76%提高到第四组的96%。前两个四分位数的盲肠插管时间(分别为8.9±1.0分钟和8.2±0.8分钟)明显长于历史队列(5.8±0.4分钟),但在接下来的两个四分位数中有所下降并与对照值相当(分别为7.2±0.9分钟和6.6±0.6分钟)。总体腺瘤检出率作为一个组(55%),优于历史队列(46%)。

结论

对于经验丰富的结肠镜检查医师来说,水灌肠法相对容易学习。掌握该方法可使盲肠插管率和总体腺瘤检出率达到质量性能标准。

相似文献

1
The water method for aiding colonoscope insertion: the learning curve of an experienced colonoscopist.
J Interv Gastroenterol. 2011 Jul;1(3):97-101. doi: 10.4161/jig.1.3.18507. Epub 2011 Jul 1.
2
Water exchange method for colonoscopy: learning curve of an experienced colonoscopist in a U.S. community practice setting.
J Interv Gastroenterol. 2012 Jul;2(3):128-132. doi: 10.4161/jig.23734. Epub 2012 Jul 1.
3
A head-to-head comparison of the water vs. air method in patients undergoing screening colonoscopy.
J Interv Gastroenterol. 2011 Jul;1(3):130-135. doi: 10.4161/jig.1.3.18512. Epub 2011 Jul 1.
4
Quality indicators for screening colonoscopy and colonoscopist performance and the subsequent risk of interval colorectal cancer: a systematic review.
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2019 Nov;17(11):2265-2300. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2017-003927.
5
A novel method with significant impact on adenoma detection: combined water-exchange and cap-assisted colonoscopy.
Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 Jun;77(6):944-8. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.01.011. Epub 2013 Mar 6.
6
The water exchange method for colonoscopy-effect of coaching.
J Interv Gastroenterol. 2012 Jul;2(3):122-125. doi: 10.4161/jig.23732. Epub 2012 Jul 1.
9
Impact of a novel water method on scheduled unsedated colonoscopy in U.S. veterans.
Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Mar;69(3 Pt 1):546-50. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.08.014.
10
Cecal intubation time between cap-assisted water exchange and water exchange colonoscopy: a randomized-controlled trial.
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Nov;29(11):1296-1302. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000000954.

引用本文的文献

1
ENDOANGEL water exchange for the detection of colorectal adenomas.
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2023 Dec 18;16:17562848231218570. doi: 10.1177/17562848231218570. eCollection 2023.
2
How to perform water exchange colonoscopy, with tips and tricks.
VideoGIE. 2019 May 23;4(8):355-357. doi: 10.1016/j.vgie.2019.03.021. eCollection 2019 Aug.
3
Increase your adenoma detection rate without using fancy adjunct tools.
Tzu Chi Med J. 2018 Jul-Sep;30(3):127-134. doi: 10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_86_18.
4
Can Water Exchange Improve Patient Tolerance in Unsedated Colonoscopy A Prospective Comparative Study.
GE Port J Gastroenterol. 2018 Jun;25(4):166-174. doi: 10.1159/000484093. Epub 2017 Nov 16.
5
Water-Assisted Colonoscopy.
Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol. 2017 Mar;15(1):135-154. doi: 10.1007/s11938-017-0119-1.
6
Water Exchange Method Significantly Improves Adenoma Detection Rate: A Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial.
Am J Gastroenterol. 2017 Apr;112(4):568-576. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2016.501. Epub 2016 Dec 6.
7
What Influences the Quality of Prevention Colonoscopy?
Viszeralmedizin. 2014 Feb;30(1):26-31. doi: 10.1159/000358747.
8
Is colonoscopy best learned underwater?
J Interv Gastroenterol. 2012 Jul;2(3):140-141. doi: 10.4161/jig.23737. Epub 2012 Jul 1.
9
Re-learning colonoscopy: just a matter of time.
J Interv Gastroenterol. 2012 Jul;2(3):133-134. doi: 10.4161/jig.23735. Epub 2012 Jul 1.
10
Water exchange method for colonoscopy: learning curve of an experienced colonoscopist in a U.S. community practice setting.
J Interv Gastroenterol. 2012 Jul;2(3):128-132. doi: 10.4161/jig.23734. Epub 2012 Jul 1.

本文引用的文献

1
Is there a place for sedationless colonoscopy?
J Interv Gastroenterol. 2011 Jan;1(1):19-22. doi: 10.4161/jig.1.1.14592.
2
The water method significantly enhances proximal diminutive adenoma detection rate in unsedated patients.
J Interv Gastroenterol. 2011 Jan;1(1):8-13. doi: 10.4161/jig.1.1.14587.
5
The water immersion technique for colonoscopy insertion.
Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y). 2010 Sep;6(9):555-6.
6
Warm water infusion versus air insufflation for unsedated colonoscopy: a randomized, controlled trial.
Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Oct;72(4):701-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.06.025.
8
Water immersion versus standard colonoscopy insertion technique: randomized trial shows promise for minimal sedation.
Endoscopy. 2010 Jul;42(7):557-63. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1244231. Epub 2010 Jun 30.
9
High-definition chromocolonoscopy vs. high-definition white light colonoscopy for average-risk colorectal cancer screening.
Am J Gastroenterol. 2010 Jun;105(6):1301-7. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2010.51. Epub 2010 Feb 23.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验