Suppr超能文献

水浸法与标准结肠镜插入技术:随机试验显示了最小镇静的潜力。

Water immersion versus standard colonoscopy insertion technique: randomized trial shows promise for minimal sedation.

机构信息

Veterans Affairs Palo Alto, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.

出版信息

Endoscopy. 2010 Jul;42(7):557-63. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1244231. Epub 2010 Jun 30.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

Water immersion is an alternative colonoscopy technique that may reduce discomfort and facilitate insertion of the instrument. This was a prospective study to compare the success of colonoscopy with minimal sedation using water immersion and conventional air insufflation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 229 patients were randomized to either water immersion or the standard air insertion technique. The primary outcome was success of minimal sedation colonoscopy, which was defined as reaching the cecum without additional sedation, exchange of the adult colonoscope or hands-on assistance for trainees. Patient comfort and satisfaction were also assessed.

RESULTS

Successful minimal-sedation colonoscopy was achieved in 51 % of the water immersion group compared with 28 % in the standard air group (OR, 2.66; 95 % CI 1.48 - 4.79; P = 0.0004). Attending physicians had 79 % success with water immersion compared with 47 % with air insufflation (OR, 4.19; 95 % CI 1.5 - 12.17; P = 0.002), whereas trainees had 34 % success with water compared with 16 % using air (OR, 2.75; 95 % CI 1.15 - 6.86; P = 0.01). Using the water method, endoscopists intubated the cecum faster and this was particularly notable for trainees (13.0 +/- 7.5 minutes with water vs. 20.5 +/- 13.9 minutes with air; P = 0.0001). Total procedure time was significantly shorter with water for both experienced and trainee endoscopists ( P < 0.05). Patients reported less intraprocedural pain with water compared with air (4.1 +/- 2.7 vs. 5.3 +/- 2.7; P = 0.001), with a similar level of satisfaction. There was no difference in the neoplasm detection rates between the groups.

CONCLUSION

Colonoscopy insertion using water immersion increases the success rate of minimal sedation colonoscopy. Use of the technique leads to a decrease in discomfort, time to reach the cecum, and the amount of sedative and analgesic used, without compromising patient satisfaction.

摘要

背景与研究目的

水浸法是一种替代结肠镜检查的技术,它可以减轻不适并方便器械插入。本研究旨在比较水浸法与常规空气充气法在最小镇静下进行结肠镜检查的效果。

患者与方法

总共 229 名患者被随机分为水浸组或标准空气插入组。主要观察指标为最小镇静下结肠镜检查的成功率,定义为无需额外镇静、更换成人结肠镜或接受培训的医生手动协助即可到达盲肠。还评估了患者的舒适度和满意度。

结果

水浸组的最小镇静下结肠镜检查成功率为 51%,而标准空气组为 28%(OR,2.66;95%CI,1.48-4.79;P=0.0004)。主治医生使用水浸法的成功率为 79%,而使用空气充气法的成功率为 47%(OR,4.19;95%CI,1.5-12.17;P=0.002),而培训医生使用水浸法的成功率为 34%,而使用空气充气法的成功率为 16%(OR,2.75;95%CI,1.15-6.86;P=0.01)。使用水浸法,内镜医生更快地将盲肠插管,对于培训医生来说尤其明显(水浸法为 13.0 +/- 7.5 分钟,空气充气法为 20.5 +/- 13.9 分钟;P=0.0001)。对于有经验的和培训医生,使用水浸法的总手术时间明显更短(P < 0.05)。与空气充气法相比,患者报告水浸法的术中疼痛程度较低(4.1 +/- 2.7 与 5.3 +/- 2.7;P=0.001),满意度相似。两组的肿瘤检出率无差异。

结论

使用水浸法插入结肠镜可提高最小镇静结肠镜检查的成功率。该技术的使用可减少不适、到达盲肠的时间以及镇静和镇痛药物的使用量,而不影响患者的满意度。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验