Atmospheric Environment Laboratory, Department of Environment & Energy, Sejong University, Seoul, 143-747 Korea.
Sensors (Basel). 2010;10(8):7287-302. doi: 10.3390/s100807287. Epub 2010 Aug 3.
To simulate the occurrence of masking phenomena with the aid of an air dilution sensory (ads) test, two types of odorant mixtures were prepared: (1) M(2) with two individual odorants [H(2)S and acetaldehyde (AA)] and (2) M(6) with six individual odorants (H(2)S and five aldehydes). The test results derived for samples containing single individual odorants at a wide range of concentrations are initially used to define the empirical relationship between the dilution-to-threshold (D/T) ratio and odor intensity (OI) scaling. Based on these relationships, the D/T ratios were estimated for each odorant with the same intensity as the synthetic mixture. The relative contribution of each odorant to such mixture is then assessed by comparing the estimated and measured D/T values. This stepwise test confirmed the dominance of certain compounds at a given OI rating. In the case of M(2), H(2)S showed sensitive detection at high OI range, while AA did so at low end. The pattern of a competing relationship is also seen consistently from M(6) between AA (low) and iso-valeraldehyde (IA: high OI range). The overall results thus suggest that the masking phenomena between strong odorants should proceed under competing relationships, if released at the same time.
为了借助空气稀释感知(ads)测试模拟掩蔽现象的发生,制备了两种类型的气味混合物:(1)M(2),由两种单独的气味剂[H(2)S 和乙醛(AA)]组成;(2)M(6),由六种单独的气味剂(H(2)S 和五种醛)组成。最初,使用在广泛浓度范围内包含单个单独气味剂的样品的测试结果来定义稀释至阈值(D/T)比与气味强度(OI)标度之间的经验关系。基于这些关系,用与合成混合物相同强度的每种气味剂估计 D/T 比。然后,通过比较估计和测量的 D/T 值来评估每种气味剂对这种混合物的相对贡献。这种逐步测试证实了在给定 OI 等级下某些化合物的主导地位。在 M(2)的情况下,H(2)S 在高 OI 范围内显示出敏感检测,而 AA 在低端则如此。在 M(6)中,AA(低)和异戊醛(IA:高 OI 范围)之间也始终存在竞争关系的模式。因此,总体结果表明,如果同时释放,强气味剂之间的掩蔽现象应在竞争关系下进行。