Public Health & Preventive Medicine Residency Program, School of Population & Public Health, University of British Columbia, 2206 East Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3.
Can J Public Health. 2011 Nov-Dec;102(6):432-6. doi: 10.1007/BF03404194.
To explore the experiences of British Columbia's (BC's) Public Health Inspectors in practicing health promotion.
We administered a mixed qualitative-quantitative survey to 15 BC Public Health Inspectors (in BC, titled Environmental Health Officers--EHOs), selected to represent different levels of authority, areas of work and geographic regions. We queried whether and how they practice health promotion, strategies utilized, how health promotion relates to their enforcement mandates, perceived effectiveness of health promotion, and barriers and enabling factors affecting its adoption.
Fourteen respondents (93%) practiced health promotion. Common practices included building healthy public policy, developing personal skills, and creating environments that support health. Health promotion was most often applied as " part of enforcement"; EHOs first attempted to educate and create environments that support regulatory standards and best practices, utilizing enforcement measures should the former prove ineffective. Enforcement was recognized as an important tool. Most respondents did not feel that their enforcement mandate limited their use of health promotion; however barriers exist where the EHO is perceived unfavourably as an "enforcer". The majority felt that an increased use of health promotion would make their protection work more effective. Strategies to facilitate its application include practical training in implementation, clear expectations and accountability at all levels of planning, resources, and relationships with stakeholders.
EHOs engage in a broad and varied health promotion practice. Practical training with a focus on health promotion implementation in the BC context, and clear and consistent direction regarding expectations and accountability, would facilitate greater involvement.
探索不列颠哥伦比亚省(BC)的公共卫生督察员在实践健康促进方面的经验。
我们对 15 名不列颠哥伦比亚省公共卫生督察员(在 BC 省被称为环境卫生官员-EHO)进行了混合定性-定量调查,这些督察员是经过挑选的,代表了不同的权力级别、工作领域和地理区域。我们询问他们是否以及如何实践健康促进、他们使用的策略、健康促进与他们的执法任务的关系、对健康促进的有效性的看法,以及影响其采用的障碍和促成因素。
14 名受访者(93%)从事健康促进工作。常见的做法包括制定健康的公共政策、发展个人技能和创造支持健康的环境。健康促进最常被应用于“作为执法的一部分”;EHO 首先试图教育和创造支持监管标准和最佳实践的环境,如果前者证明无效,就利用执法措施。执法被认为是一个重要的工具。大多数受访者认为他们的执法任务并不限制他们使用健康促进;但是,当 EHO 被视为不友好的“执法者”时,就存在障碍。大多数人认为增加健康促进的使用会使他们的保护工作更有效。促进其应用的策略包括在 BC 背景下进行实施方面的实际培训、在各级规划、资源和与利益相关者的关系中明确期望和问责制。
EHO 从事广泛而多样的健康促进实践。在 BC 背景下,针对健康促进实施进行实际培训,并明确和一致地指导期望和问责制,将有助于更多的参与。