Piracicaba Dental School, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Oper Dent. 2012 Mar-Apr;37(2):188-94. doi: 10.2341/10-288-L. Epub 2011 Dec 14.
The aim of this study was to assess Knoop hardness at different depths of a dual-cured self-adhesive resin cement through different thicknesses of Empress Esthetic® ceramic.Flattened bovine dentin was embedded in resin. The cement was inserted into a rubber mold (0.8 x 5 mm) that was placed between two polyvinyl chloride plastic films and placed over the flat dentin and light cured by Elipar Trilight-QTH (800 mW/cm2) or Ultra-Lumelight-emitting diode (LED 5; 1585 mW/cm2) over ceramic disks 1.4 or 2 mm thick. The specimens(n=6) were stored for 24 hours before Knoop hardness (KHN) was measured. The data were submitted to analysis of variance in a factorial split-plot design and Tukey's test (a=0.05).There was significant interaction among the study factors. In the groups cured by the QTHunit, an increase in ceramic thickness resulted in reduced cement hardness values at all depths, with the highest values always being found in the center (1.4 mm, 58.1; 2 mm, 50.1)and the lowest values at the bottom (1.4 mm,23.8; 2 mm, 20.2). When using the LED unit, the hardness values diminished with increased ceramic thickness only on the top (1.4 mm,51.5; 2 mm, 42.3). In the group with the 1.4-mm-thick disk, the LED curing unit resulted in similar values on the top (51.5) and center(51.9) and lower values on the bottom (24.2).However, when the cement was light cured through the 2-mm disk, the highest hardness value was obtained in the center (51.8), followed by the top (42.3) and bottom (19.9),results similar to those obtained with the QTH curing unit (center > top > bottom). The hardness values of the studied cement at different depths were dependent on the ceramic thickness but not on the light curing units used.
本研究旨在通过 Empress Esthetic®陶瓷不同的厚度来评估双重固化自粘接树脂水门汀在不同深度的 Knoop 硬度。将扁平牛牙本质嵌入树脂中。将水泥插入橡胶模具(0.8 x 5 毫米)中,该模具放置在两块聚氯乙烯塑料薄膜之间,并放置在平坦的牙本质上,用 Elipar Trilight-QTH(800 mW/cm2)或 Ultra-Lumelight 发光二极管(LED 5;1585 mW/cm2)固化陶瓷盘 1.4 或 2 毫米厚。将试件(n=6)在陶瓷上储存 24 小时后,进行 Knoop 硬度(KHN)测量。将数据提交给因子分块设计的方差分析和 Tukey 检验(a=0.05)。研究因素之间存在显著的相互作用。在由 QTH 单元固化的组中,随着陶瓷厚度的增加,水泥硬度值在所有深度上均降低,中心的硬度值最高(1.4 毫米,58.1;2 毫米,50.1),底部的硬度值最低(1.4 毫米,23.8;2 毫米,20.2)。当使用 LED 单元时,仅在顶部(1.4 毫米,51.5;2 毫米,42.3)随陶瓷厚度的增加而硬度值减小。在 1.4 毫米厚的磁盘组中,LED 固化单元在顶部(51.5)和中心(51.9)处产生相似的值,在底部(24.2)处产生较低的值。然而,当水泥通过 2 毫米的磁盘进行光固化时,中心处获得的最高硬度值(51.8)最高,其次是顶部(42.3)和底部(19.9),这与 QTH 固化单元获得的结果相似(中心>顶部>底部)。研究水泥在不同深度的硬度值取决于陶瓷厚度,但与使用的光固化单元无关。