Suppr超能文献

一项关于伴有和不伴有牛骨矿物质附加治疗的 32 个骨内缺损开放式翻瓣手术的随机研究。

A randomized study of open-flap surgery of 32 intrabony defects with and without adjunct bovine bone mineral treatment.

机构信息

Department of Periodontology, The Institute for Postgraduate Dental Education, Jönköping, Sweden.

出版信息

J Periodontol. 2012 Aug;83(8):999-1007. doi: 10.1902/jop.2011.110490. Epub 2011 Dec 13.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Bovine bone mineral (BBM) is extensively used as a filler material in periodontal reconstructive surgery of intrabony defects. Data are mostly available on the combined use of BBM with other biomaterials. The aim of this study is to evaluate healing after open-flap debridement (OF) of intrabony periodontal defects alone or with adjunct treatment with BBM.

METHODS

After initial treatment, 32 patients with 32 intrabony periodontal defects participated in the study. Full-thickness flaps were raised and root surfaces and defects were debrided. Patients were then randomly assigned to treatment groups, either OF alone or combined with defect fill with BBM, and followed in a strict postoperative maintenance care program for 12 months.

RESULTS

At 12 months, a mean ± SE gingival recession of 1.1 ± 0.3 mm in OF and 0.9 ± 0.4 mm in BBM occurred. Probing depth reduction was 4.0 ± 0.5 mm in OF and 3.2 ± 0.7 mm in BBM. Gain in clinical attachment level was 2.8 ± 0.6 mm in OF and 2.3 ± 0.8 mm in BBM. Probing bone level was reduced by 2.7 ± 0.7 mm in OF and 1.8 ± 1.1 mm in BBM. None of the above parameters showed significant intergroup differences. In contrast, radiographic defect depth change was significantly greater in BBM (3.4 ± 2.3 mm) than in OF (1.9 ± 1.7 mm).

CONCLUSIONS

Both treatments resulted in improved periodontal conditions. The adjunctive use of BBM in this study did not enhance the clinical result compared to OF alone.

摘要

背景

牛骨矿物质(BBM)广泛用作牙周骨内缺损重建手术的填充物。数据主要可用于 BBM 与其他生物材料联合使用的情况。本研究的目的是评估单独使用开瓣清创术(OF)或联合使用 BBM 附加治疗治疗骨内牙周缺损的愈合情况。

方法

初始治疗后,32 名患有 32 个骨内牙周缺损的患者参与了本研究。翻全厚瓣,根面和缺损去垢。然后,患者被随机分配到治疗组,即单独 OF 或联合 BBM 缺陷填充,并在严格的术后维持护理计划中随访 12 个月。

结果

在 12 个月时,OF 组的平均牙龈退缩为 1.1 ± 0.3mm,BBM 组为 0.9 ± 0.4mm。OF 组的探诊深度减少了 4.0 ± 0.5mm,BBM 组为 3.2 ± 0.7mm。OF 组的临床附着水平增加了 2.8 ± 0.6mm,BBM 组为 2.3 ± 0.8mm。OF 组的探诊骨水平降低了 2.7 ± 0.7mm,BBM 组为 1.8 ± 1.1mm。这些参数均无组间差异。相比之下,BBM 组的放射学缺损深度变化(3.4 ± 2.3mm)明显大于 OF 组(1.9 ± 1.7mm)。

结论

两种治疗方法均改善了牙周状况。与单独 OF 相比,本研究中 BBM 的附加使用并未增强临床效果。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验