Suppr超能文献

一项关于伴有和不伴有牛骨矿物质附加治疗的 32 个骨内缺损开放式翻瓣手术的随机研究。

A randomized study of open-flap surgery of 32 intrabony defects with and without adjunct bovine bone mineral treatment.

机构信息

Department of Periodontology, The Institute for Postgraduate Dental Education, Jönköping, Sweden.

出版信息

J Periodontol. 2012 Aug;83(8):999-1007. doi: 10.1902/jop.2011.110490. Epub 2011 Dec 13.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Bovine bone mineral (BBM) is extensively used as a filler material in periodontal reconstructive surgery of intrabony defects. Data are mostly available on the combined use of BBM with other biomaterials. The aim of this study is to evaluate healing after open-flap debridement (OF) of intrabony periodontal defects alone or with adjunct treatment with BBM.

METHODS

After initial treatment, 32 patients with 32 intrabony periodontal defects participated in the study. Full-thickness flaps were raised and root surfaces and defects were debrided. Patients were then randomly assigned to treatment groups, either OF alone or combined with defect fill with BBM, and followed in a strict postoperative maintenance care program for 12 months.

RESULTS

At 12 months, a mean ± SE gingival recession of 1.1 ± 0.3 mm in OF and 0.9 ± 0.4 mm in BBM occurred. Probing depth reduction was 4.0 ± 0.5 mm in OF and 3.2 ± 0.7 mm in BBM. Gain in clinical attachment level was 2.8 ± 0.6 mm in OF and 2.3 ± 0.8 mm in BBM. Probing bone level was reduced by 2.7 ± 0.7 mm in OF and 1.8 ± 1.1 mm in BBM. None of the above parameters showed significant intergroup differences. In contrast, radiographic defect depth change was significantly greater in BBM (3.4 ± 2.3 mm) than in OF (1.9 ± 1.7 mm).

CONCLUSIONS

Both treatments resulted in improved periodontal conditions. The adjunctive use of BBM in this study did not enhance the clinical result compared to OF alone.

摘要

背景

牛骨矿物质(BBM)广泛用作牙周骨内缺损重建手术的填充物。数据主要可用于 BBM 与其他生物材料联合使用的情况。本研究的目的是评估单独使用开瓣清创术(OF)或联合使用 BBM 附加治疗治疗骨内牙周缺损的愈合情况。

方法

初始治疗后,32 名患有 32 个骨内牙周缺损的患者参与了本研究。翻全厚瓣,根面和缺损去垢。然后,患者被随机分配到治疗组,即单独 OF 或联合 BBM 缺陷填充,并在严格的术后维持护理计划中随访 12 个月。

结果

在 12 个月时,OF 组的平均牙龈退缩为 1.1 ± 0.3mm,BBM 组为 0.9 ± 0.4mm。OF 组的探诊深度减少了 4.0 ± 0.5mm,BBM 组为 3.2 ± 0.7mm。OF 组的临床附着水平增加了 2.8 ± 0.6mm,BBM 组为 2.3 ± 0.8mm。OF 组的探诊骨水平降低了 2.7 ± 0.7mm,BBM 组为 1.8 ± 1.1mm。这些参数均无组间差异。相比之下,BBM 组的放射学缺损深度变化(3.4 ± 2.3mm)明显大于 OF 组(1.9 ± 1.7mm)。

结论

两种治疗方法均改善了牙周状况。与单独 OF 相比,本研究中 BBM 的附加使用并未增强临床效果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验