Camargo Paulo M, Lekovic Vojislav, Weinlaender Michael, Divnic-Resnik Tihana, Pavlovic Marija, Kenney E Barrie
Division of Associated Clinical Specialties, Section of Periodontics, University of California, Los Angeles School of Dentistry, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
J Periodontol. 2009 Jun;80(6):915-23. doi: 10.1902/jop.2009.080600.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the additional benefits provided by the incorporation of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) into a regenerative protocol consisting of bovine porous bone mineral (BPBM) and guided tissue regeneration (GTR) in the treatment of intrabony defects in humans.
Twenty-three paired intrabony defects were surgically treated using a split-mouth design. Defects were treated with BPBM/GTR/PRP (experimental group) or with BPBM/GTR (control group). The clinical parameters evaluated included changes in probing depth, clinical attachment level, and defect fill as revealed by reentry surgeries at 6 months.
Preoperative probing depths, attachment levels, and transoperative bone measurements were similar for the two groups. Post-surgical measurements taken at 6 months revealed that both treatment modalities resulted in a significant decrease in probing depth, gain in clinical attachment, and bone fill of the defects compared to baseline. Postoperative differences observed between the two groups were 0.72 +/- 0.36 mm at buccal sites and 0.90 +/- 0.32 mm at lingual sites for probing depth, 0.82 +/- 0.41 mm at buccal sites and 0.78 +/- 0.38 at lingual sites for gain in clinical attachment, and 0.85 +/- 0.36 mm at buccal sites and 0.94 +/- 0.42 mm at lingual sites for defect fill, all favoring the experimental sites. However, none of the differences were statistically significant.
Within the limitations related to using a small sample size, PRP did not significantly augment the effects of BPBM and GTR in promoting the clinical resolution of intrabony defects.
本研究的目的是评估在由牛多孔骨矿物质(BPBM)和引导组织再生(GTR)组成的再生方案中加入富血小板血浆(PRP),对治疗人类骨内缺损的额外益处。
采用双侧对照设计对23对骨内缺损进行手术治疗。缺损分别采用BPBM/GTR/PRP治疗(实验组)或BPBM/GTR治疗(对照组)。评估的临床参数包括6个月时再次手术所显示的探诊深度、临床附着水平和缺损填充情况的变化。
两组术前的探诊深度、附着水平和术中骨测量结果相似。6个月时的术后测量显示,与基线相比,两种治疗方式均导致探诊深度显著降低、临床附着增加和缺损骨填充。两组术后在颊侧位点的探诊深度差异为0.72±0.36毫米,舌侧位点为0.90±0.32毫米;颊侧位点的临床附着增加差异为0.82±0.41毫米,舌侧位点为0.78±0.38毫米;颊侧位点的缺损填充差异为0.85±0.36毫米,舌侧位点为0.94±0.42毫米,所有这些均有利于实验组位点。然而,这些差异均无统计学意义。
在样本量较小相关的局限性范围内,PRP在促进骨内缺损的临床愈合方面,并未显著增强BPBM和GTR的效果。