Department of Ophthalmology, Kinki University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012 Jan 25;53(1):387-93. doi: 10.1167/iovs.11-8022.
To investigate how background complexity influences visual sensitivity and binocular summation.
Using two noise backgrounds (noise-sparse and noise-dense) and two corresponding noise-free backgrounds with the same luminance for each noise background, monocular and binocular thresholds were measured in six visually normal subjects (average age, 27.3 ± 1.1 years). The noise-sparse and noise-dense backgrounds respectively had 312 and 936 white-light dots projected on them-the same size white-light dots (0.431° of visual angle) as those that were used for the white-spot target in the threshold measurement. The target was tested at the fovea and at 3° intervals on the 45°, 135°, 225°, and 315° meridians. A total of 25 locations were tested.
The monocular threshold for the noise-dense background was higher than that for its corresponding noise-free background, with significant differences seen at 15° and 18° (P < 0.01). No significant differences in the binocular threshold were seen, either between the noise-dense and its corresponding backgrounds or between the noise-sparse and its corresponding backgrounds. The binocular summation ratios for both noise backgrounds were significantly higher than the ratios for the noise-free backgrounds, and the difference increased with eccentricity, with significances seen at 15° and 18° (P < 0.01).
Only the monocular threshold increases with background complexity. The binocular summation increases with background complexity in the periphery. When the background becomes more complex and the monocular visual processing reaches its limit, binocular interaction functions efficiently.
研究背景复杂性如何影响视觉灵敏度和双眼总和。
使用两种噪声背景(稀疏噪声和密集噪声)和两种相应的无噪声背景(每种噪声背景的亮度相同),对 6 名视力正常的受试者(平均年龄 27.3 ± 1.1 岁)进行单眼和双眼阈值测量。稀疏噪声和密集噪声背景分别投射有 312 和 936 个白光点——与用于阈值测量中的白点目标相同大小的白光点(视角 0.431°)。目标在中央凹和在 45°、135°、225°和 315°子午线上每隔 3°进行测试。共测试了 25 个位置。
密集噪声背景的单眼阈值高于其相应的无噪声背景,在 15°和 18°时差异显著(P<0.01)。密集噪声和其相应背景之间或稀疏噪声和其相应背景之间的双眼阈值差异均无统计学意义。两种噪声背景的双眼总和比率均明显高于无噪声背景的比率,并且随着离中央凹的距离增加而增加,在 15°和 18°时差异显著(P<0.01)。
只有单眼阈值随背景复杂性增加而增加。在周边,双眼总和随背景复杂性增加而增加。当背景变得更加复杂且单眼视觉处理达到极限时,双眼交互作用会有效地发挥作用。