• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用 imo 头戴式周边视野计测量未遮盖和遮盖时的单眼敏感度比较。

Comparison of monocular sensitivities measured with and without occlusion using the head-mounted perimeter imo.

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osakasayama City, Osaka, Japan.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2019 Jan 17;14(1):e0210691. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210691. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0210691
PMID:30653560
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6336334/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Using a head-mounted perimeter imo that can measure monocular sensitivity with both eyes open, we investigated the difference between monocular sensitivities measured with and without occlusion of the fellow eye and if the difference was influenced by eccentricity.

METHODS

Using the perimeter imo, monocular sensitivities with/without occlusion and binocular sensitivity were measured and compared. Three test conditions for monocular sensitivity without occlusion were: with/without a fusional fixation target, and a binocular random single eye test in which the target was randomly presented to either eye and the examinee was not aware of the tested eye. Within the central 25° visual field (VF), 29 points located at the fovea and on the 45°, 135°, 225°, and 315° meridians with 3° intervals were tested. Differences among the four monocular sensitivities with/without occlusion were further evaluated at the fovea, within and beyond the central 5° VF.

RESULTS

Sixteen visually normal volunteers (mean age, 28.6 ± 4.6 years) were included in this study. Except at the fovea, monocular sensitivities measured without occlusion were significantly higher than those with occlusion (P < 0.01). No significant difference was seen among the three monocular sensitivities without occlusion (P = 0.82).

CONCLUSIONS

Except at the fovea, monocular sensitivities measured with and without occlusion significantly differed. This indicates that without occlusion, binocular interaction is activated and affects not only binocular sensitivity but also monocular sensitivity.

摘要

目的

使用一种头戴式周边视野计,该视野计可以在双眼睁开的情况下测量单眼敏感性,我们研究了单眼敏感性在不遮盖和遮盖对侧眼时的差异,以及这种差异是否受离焦的影响。

方法

使用周边视野计测量单眼敏感性(不遮盖和遮盖对侧眼)和双眼敏感性,并进行比较。在不遮盖对侧眼的情况下,单眼敏感性测试有三种条件:有/无融合性注视目标,以及双眼随机单眼测试,其中目标随机呈现给一只眼,受检者不知道测试的是哪只眼。在中央 25°视野(VF)内,测试了位于中央凹和 45°、135°、225°和 315°子午线上的 29 个点,间隔 3°。在中央 5°VF 内和之外,进一步评估了四种有/无遮盖的单眼敏感性之间的差异。

结果

本研究纳入了 16 名视力正常的志愿者(平均年龄 28.6 ± 4.6 岁)。除中央凹外,不遮盖对侧眼时测量的单眼敏感性明显高于遮盖时(P < 0.01)。三种不遮盖对侧眼的单眼敏感性之间无显著差异(P = 0.82)。

结论

除中央凹外,有/无遮盖的单眼敏感性差异显著。这表明,在不遮盖的情况下,双眼相互作用被激活,不仅影响双眼敏感性,还影响单眼敏感性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/972c/6336334/f73ca9aa0e9b/pone.0210691.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/972c/6336334/f4cf0ec09ece/pone.0210691.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/972c/6336334/0bdd574a95c6/pone.0210691.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/972c/6336334/789bf5a6aa1c/pone.0210691.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/972c/6336334/3ae24200a13f/pone.0210691.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/972c/6336334/f73ca9aa0e9b/pone.0210691.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/972c/6336334/f4cf0ec09ece/pone.0210691.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/972c/6336334/0bdd574a95c6/pone.0210691.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/972c/6336334/789bf5a6aa1c/pone.0210691.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/972c/6336334/3ae24200a13f/pone.0210691.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/972c/6336334/f73ca9aa0e9b/pone.0210691.g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of monocular sensitivities measured with and without occlusion using the head-mounted perimeter imo.使用 imo 头戴式周边视野计测量未遮盖和遮盖时的单眼敏感度比较。
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 17;14(1):e0210691. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210691. eCollection 2019.
2
Visual Field Testing with Head-Mounted Perimeter 'imo'.使用头戴式视野计“imo”进行视野测试。
PLoS One. 2016 Aug 26;11(8):e0161974. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0161974. eCollection 2016.
3
Comparison of central visual sensitivity between monocular and binocular testing in advanced glaucoma patients using imo perimetry.利用 imo 视野计比较晚期青光眼患者单眼和双眼测试的中心视觉敏感度。
Br J Ophthalmol. 2020 Nov;104(11):1258-1534. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2019-315251. Epub 2020 Mar 9.
4
Effect of Sensitivity Disparity Between the Two Eyes on Pointwise Monocular Sensitivity Under Binocular Viewing in Patients With Glaucoma.双眼注视下双眼视敏度差异对青光眼患者点单眼视敏度的影响。
J Glaucoma. 2021 Jan 1;30(1):37-43. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001675.
5
A comparison of binocular summation in the peripheral visual field in young and older patients.年轻患者与老年患者周边视野双眼总和的比较。
Curr Eye Res. 1997 Mar;16(3):252-5. doi: 10.1076/ceyr.16.3.252.15407.
6
Dynamic visual fields of one-eyed observers.单眼观察者的动态视野。
Optometry. 2005 May;76(5):285-92. doi: 10.1016/s1529-1839(05)70311-0.
7
Influence of background complexity on visual sensitivity and binocular summation using patterns with and without noise.背景复杂程度对有噪声和无噪声图形视觉敏感度及双眼总和的影响。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012 Jan 25;53(1):387-93. doi: 10.1167/iovs.11-8022.
8
Properties of receptive field on binocular fusion stimulation in the central visual field.中央视野双眼融合刺激下的感受野特性
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2002 Sep;240(9):743-7. doi: 10.1007/s00417-002-0526-3. Epub 2002 Aug 16.
9
[Effect of stimulus size on binocular summation within the binocular visual field].[刺激大小对双眼视野内双眼总和的影响]
Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi. 2001 Feb;105(2):111-8.
10
Influence of target size and eccentricity on binocular summation of reaction time in kinetic perimetry.目标大小和离心率对动态视野检查中反应时间双眼总和的影响。
Vision Res. 2011 Jan;51(1):174-8. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2010.11.002. Epub 2010 Nov 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Eyecatcher 3.0 - Validating the Use of "Smart Glasses" as a Low-Cost, Portable Method of Assessing Visual Fields.眼球捕捉器3.0——验证将“智能眼镜”作为一种低成本、便携式视野评估方法的应用
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2025 Aug 1;14(8):7. doi: 10.1167/tvst.14.8.7.
2
Evaluation of visual function within the central 10 degrees using IMOvifa™ 24plus (1-2).使用IM Ovifa™ 24plus评估中央10度范围内的视觉功能(1 - 2)。
PLoS One. 2025 May 12;20(5):e0323630. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323630. eCollection 2025.
3
Comparison of IMO vifa24plus(1-2) and Humphrey Field Analyzer 24-2.

本文引用的文献

1
Bilateral Concurrent Eye Examination with a Head-Mounted Perimeter for Diagnosing Functional Visual Loss.使用头戴式视野计进行双眼同步检查以诊断功能性视力丧失
Neuroophthalmology. 2016 Sep 20;40(6):281-285. doi: 10.1080/01658107.2016.1220593. eCollection 2016 Dec.
2
Visual Field Testing with Head-Mounted Perimeter 'imo'.使用头戴式视野计“imo”进行视野测试。
PLoS One. 2016 Aug 26;11(8):e0161974. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0161974. eCollection 2016.
3
Influence of background complexity on visual sensitivity and binocular summation using patterns with and without noise.
IMO vifa24plus(1-2)与汉弗莱视野分析仪24-2的比较。
Clin Ophthalmol. 2025 Jan 30;19:301-307. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S506059. eCollection 2025.
4
Reference Database for a Novel Binocular Visual Function Perimeter: A Randomized Clinical Trial.新型双眼视觉功能视野计参考数据库:一项随机临床试验。
Ophthalmol Sci. 2024 Jul 20;4(6):100583. doi: 10.1016/j.xops.2024.100583. eCollection 2024 Nov-Dec.
5
Comparison of Glaucoma Detection Performance of Binocular Perimetry Screening Program Using imo Perimetry With Frequency Doubling Technology.采用 imo 视野计的倍频技术进行双目视野筛查方案对青光眼检测性能的比较。
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2024 Aug 1;13(8):9. doi: 10.1167/tvst.13.8.9.
6
Comparison of the TEMPO binocular perimeter and Humphrey field analyzer.TEMPO 双目视野计与 Humphrey 视野分析仪的比较。
Sci Rep. 2023 Dec 1;13(1):21189. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-48105-5.
7
Test-retest repeatability of the imo binocular random single-eye test and Humphrey monocular test in patients with glaucoma.青光眼患者 imo 双眼随机单眼测试和 Humphrey 单眼测试的重测重复性。
Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2023 Sep;67(5):578-589. doi: 10.1007/s10384-023-01007-5. Epub 2023 Jul 1.
8
Comparison of imo and Humphrey field analyzer perimeters in glaucomatous eyes.青光眼患者眼中imo视野分析仪与汉弗莱视野分析仪周边视野的比较。
Int J Ophthalmol. 2021 Dec 18;14(12):1882-1887. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2021.12.11. eCollection 2021.
9
Age-dependent changes in visual sensitivity induced by moving fixation points in adduction and abduction using imo perimetry.使用 imo 周边视野计测量在眼球内收和外展时移动固视点诱导的视觉敏感性的年龄依赖性变化。
Sci Rep. 2020 Dec 3;10(1):21175. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-78147-y.
10
Comparison of central visual sensitivity between monocular and binocular testing in advanced glaucoma patients using imo perimetry.利用 imo 视野计比较晚期青光眼患者单眼和双眼测试的中心视觉敏感度。
Br J Ophthalmol. 2020 Nov;104(11):1258-1534. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2019-315251. Epub 2020 Mar 9.
背景复杂程度对有噪声和无噪声图形视觉敏感度及双眼总和的影响。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012 Jan 25;53(1):387-93. doi: 10.1167/iovs.11-8022.
4
Influence of target size and eccentricity on binocular summation of reaction time in kinetic perimetry.目标大小和离心率对动态视野检查中反应时间双眼总和的影响。
Vision Res. 2011 Jan;51(1):174-8. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2010.11.002. Epub 2010 Nov 13.
5
Quantifying adaptation and fatigue effects in frequency doubling perimetry.量化频率加倍视野检查中的适应和疲劳效应。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007 Feb;48(2):943-8. doi: 10.1167/iovs.06-0685.
6
Binocular summation of detection and resolution thresholds in the central visual field using parallel-line targets.使用平行线目标对中央视野中的检测阈值和分辨阈值进行双眼总和测定。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005 Aug;46(8):2810-5. doi: 10.1167/iovs.04-1421.
7
Properties of receptive field on binocular fusion stimulation in the central visual field.中央视野双眼融合刺激下的感受野特性
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2002 Sep;240(9):743-7. doi: 10.1007/s00417-002-0526-3. Epub 2002 Aug 16.
8
The effect of ocular dominance on visual field testing.眼优势对视野测试的影响。
Optom Vis Sci. 2002 Feb;79(2):93-7. doi: 10.1097/00006324-200202000-00010.
9
Effect of dichoptic adaptation on frequency-doubling perimetry.双眼分视适应对频率加倍视野检查的影响。
Optom Vis Sci. 2002 Feb;79(2):88-92. doi: 10.1097/00006324-200202000-00009.
10
Visual competition.视觉竞争
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2002 Jan;3(1):13-21. doi: 10.1038/nrn701.