• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

减少毁林和森林退化所致排放(REDD+):游戏规则改变者还是又一个权宜之计?

Reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD+): game changer or just another quick fix?

机构信息

Terrestrial Ecology and Sustainability Science and the School of Marine and Tropical Biology, James Cook University, Cairns, Australia.

出版信息

Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2012 Feb;1249:137-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06306.x. Epub 2011 Dec 14.

DOI:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06306.x
PMID:22168380
Abstract

Reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD+) provides financial compensation to land owners who avoid converting standing forests to other land uses. In this paper, we review the main opportunities and challenges for REDD+ implementation, including expectations for REDD+ to deliver on multiple environmental and societal cobenefits. We also highlight a recent case study, the Norway-Indonesia REDD+ agreement and discuss how it might be a harbinger of outcomes in other forest-rich nations seeking REDD+ funds. Looking forward, we critically examine the fundamental assumptions of REDD+ as a solution for the atmospheric buildup of greenhouse gas emissions and tropical deforestation. We conclude that REDD+ is currently the most promising mechanism driving the conservation of tropical forests. Yet, to emerge as a true game changer, REDD+ must still demonstrate that it can access low transaction cost and high-volume carbon markets or funds, while also providing or complimenting a suite of nonmonetary incentives to encourage a developing nation's transition from forest losing to forest gaining, and align with, not undermine, a globally cohesive attempt to mitigate anthropogenic climate change.

摘要

减少森林砍伐和森林退化所致排放量(REDD+)为避免将现有森林转换为其他用途的土地所有者提供了资金补偿。本文综述了 REDD+实施的主要机遇和挑战,包括对 REDD+能带来多重环境和社会协同效益的期望。本文还突出了一个最近的案例研究,即挪威-印度尼西亚 REDD+协议,并讨论了它如何预示着其他寻求 REDD+资金的森林资源丰富国家的结果。展望未来,我们批判性地审视了 REDD+作为解决温室气体大气积累和热带森林砍伐问题的一种方案的基本假设。我们的结论是,REDD+ 目前是推动保护热带森林的最有希望的机制。然而,要成为真正的变革推动者,REDD+ 仍必须证明它能够进入低交易成本和高容量的碳市场或资金,同时提供或补充一系列非货币激励措施,以鼓励发展中国家从森林损失向森林增益过渡,并与全球协调一致的缓解人为气候变化的努力相一致,而不是破坏这种努力。

相似文献

1
Reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD+): game changer or just another quick fix?减少毁林和森林退化所致排放(REDD+):游戏规则改变者还是又一个权宜之计?
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2012 Feb;1249:137-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06306.x. Epub 2011 Dec 14.
2
Designing a carbon market that protects forests in developing countries.设计一个保护发展中国家森林的碳市场。
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2002 Aug 15;360(1797):1875-88. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2002.1037.
3
Reducing greenhouse gas emissions from deforestation and forest degradation: global land-use implications.减少森林砍伐和森林退化所致温室气体排放:对全球土地利用的影响
Science. 2008 Jun 13;320(5882):1454-5. doi: 10.1126/science.1155358.
4
Harnessing carbon payments to protect biodiversity.利用碳支付来保护生物多样性。
Science. 2009 Dec 4;326(5958):1368. doi: 10.1126/science.1180289.
5
Spatial patterns of carbon, biodiversity, deforestation threat, and REDD+ projects in Indonesia.印度尼西亚碳、生物多样性、森林砍伐威胁及降排加项目的空间格局。
Conserv Biol. 2015 Oct;29(5):1434-45. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12500. Epub 2015 Apr 10.
6
REDD+ readiness implications for Sri Lanka in terms of reducing deforestation.斯里兰卡减少森林砍伐的 REDD+ 准备情况的影响。
J Environ Manage. 2012 Jun 15;100:29-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.01.018. Epub 2012 Feb 21.
7
REDD: a reckoning of environment and development implications.REDD:对环境和发展影响的清算。
Trends Ecol Evol. 2010 Jul;25(7):396-402. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2010.03.005. Epub 2010 Apr 22.
8
Modeling trade-offs across carbon sequestration, biodiversity conservation, and equity in the distribution of global REDD+ funds.在全球 REDD+ 资金分配中,对碳固存、生物多样性保护和公平性进行权衡建模。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Nov 5;116(45):22645-22650. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1908683116. Epub 2019 Oct 21.
9
Carbon emissions reductions from Indonesia's moratorium on forest concessions are cost-effective yet contribute little to Paris pledges.印度尼西亚暂停森林特许权导致的碳排放减少具有成本效益,但对巴黎承诺的贡献很小。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Feb 1;119(5). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2102613119.
10
Evidence that a national REDD+ program reduces tree cover loss and carbon emissions in a high forest cover, low deforestation country.有证据表明,在一个森林覆盖率高、森林砍伐率低的国家,国家 REDD+ 计划减少了森林覆盖的损失和碳排放。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Dec 3;116(49):24492-24499. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1904027116. Epub 2019 Nov 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Mapping co-benefits for carbon storage and biodiversity to inform conservation policy and action.将碳储存和生物多样性的协同效益进行映射,为保护政策和行动提供信息。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2020 Mar 16;375(1794):20190128. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0128. Epub 2020 Jan 27.
2
Degradation and forgone removals increase the carbon impact of intact forest loss by 626.退化和不可避免的清除会使完整森林损失的碳影响增加 626 倍。
Sci Adv. 2019 Oct 30;5(10):eaax2546. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aax2546. eCollection 2019 Oct.
3
Primates in peril: the significance of Brazil, Madagascar, Indonesia and the Democratic Republic of the Congo for global primate conservation.
濒危灵长类动物:巴西、马达加斯加、印度尼西亚和刚果民主共和国对全球灵长类动物保护的重要意义。
PeerJ. 2018 Jun 15;6:e4869. doi: 10.7717/peerj.4869. eCollection 2018.
4
Building the evidence base for REDD+: Study design and methods for evaluating the impacts of conservation interventions on local well-being.建立减少毁林和森林退化所致排放量(REDD+)的证据基础:评估保护干预措施对当地福祉影响的研究设计与方法
Glob Environ Change. 2017 Mar;43:148-160. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.02.002. Epub 2017 Mar 6.
5
Impending extinction crisis of the world's primates: Why primates matter.世界灵长类动物即将灭绝的危机:为什么灵长类动物很重要。
Sci Adv. 2017 Jan 18;3(1):e1600946. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1600946. eCollection 2017 Jan.
6
Identifying Where REDD+ Financially Out-Competes Oil Palm in Floodplain Landscapes Using a Fine-Scale Approach.使用精细尺度方法确定在洪泛区景观中 REDD+ 在经济上比油棕更具竞争力的区域。
PLoS One. 2016 Jun 8;11(6):e0156481. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156481. eCollection 2016.
7
Developing Cost-Effective Field Assessments of Carbon Stocks in Human-Modified Tropical Forests.开展对人类改造的热带森林碳储量具有成本效益的实地评估。
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 26;10(8):e0133139. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133139. eCollection 2015.
8
Validating Community-Led Forest Biomass Assessments.验证社区主导的森林生物量评估
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 30;10(6):e0130529. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0130529. eCollection 2015.