Suppr超能文献

瘙痒强度评估:视觉模拟评分法、数字评分法和言语评分法在 471 例慢性瘙痒患者中的有效性和可靠性的前瞻性研究。

Assessment of pruritus intensity: prospective study on validity and reliability of the visual analogue scale, numerical rating scale and verbal rating scale in 471 patients with chronic pruritus.

机构信息

Competence Center for Chronic Pruritus, Department of Dermatology, University Hospital, Münster, Germany.

出版信息

Acta Derm Venereol. 2012 Sep;92(5):502-7. doi: 10.2340/00015555-1246.

Abstract

The most commonly used tool for self-report of pruritus intensity is the visual analogue scale (VAS). Similar tools are the numerical rating scale (NRS) and verbal rating scale (VRS). In the present study, initiated by the International Forum for the Study of Itch assessing reliability of these tools, 471 randomly selected patients with chronic itch (200 males, 271 females, mean age 58.44 years) recorded their pruritus intensity on VAS (100-mm line), NRS (0-10) and VRS (four-point) scales. Re-test reliability was analysed in a subgroup of 250 patients after one hour. Statistical analysis showed a high reliability and concurrent validity (r>0.8; p<0.01) for all tools. Mean values of all scales showed a high correlation. In conclusion, high reliability and concurrent validity was found for VAS, NRS and VRS. On re-test, higher correlation and less missing values were observed. A training session before starting a clinical trial is recommended.

摘要

瘙痒强度自评最常用的工具是视觉模拟评分法(VAS)。类似的工具还有数字评分法(NRS)和言语评分法(VRS)。本研究由国际瘙痒研究论坛发起,旨在评估这些工具的可靠性,共纳入 471 例慢性瘙痒患者(男 200 例,女 271 例,平均年龄 58.44 岁),使用 VAS(100mm 线)、NRS(0-10)和 VRS(四点)对瘙痒强度进行评分。250 例患者在 1 小时后进行了重测。统计分析显示,所有工具的可靠性和同时效度均较高(r>0.8;p<0.01)。所有量表的平均值相关性较高。结论:VAS、NRS 和 VRS 具有较高的可靠性和同时效度。重测时,相关性更高,缺失值更少。建议在开展临床试验前进行培训。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验