• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜下经会阴直肠肛门切除术:两全其美。

Laparoscopic extralevator abdominal perineal excision of the rectum: the best of both worlds.

机构信息

University Hospitals Leicester, Leicester, UK.

出版信息

Tech Coloproctol. 2012 Feb;16(1):73-5. doi: 10.1007/s10151-011-0797-y. Epub 2011 Dec 15.

DOI:10.1007/s10151-011-0797-y
PMID:22170251
Abstract

We report a combined laparoscopic and open technique for extralevator abdominal perineal excision of the rectum. The key steps are a laparoscopic rectal dissection limited distally by the coccyx. The open, prone, perineal dissection affords excellent views and allows a cylindrical specimen to be obtained. The resulting perineal defect is closed by a biological mesh. Extralevator abdominal perineal excision of the rectum offers a superior oncological specimen with reduced circumferential resection margin involvement compared to traditional techniques. Combined with a laparoscopic approach, this also has the potential to improve postoperative recovery and reduce morbidity.

摘要

我们报告了一种联合腹腔镜和开放性技术用于经腹会阴联合切除直肠(extralevator abdominal perineal excision of the rectum,APER)。关键步骤是腹腔镜下的直肠分离,仅在尾骨处保留远端。开放性、俯卧位、会阴分离提供了极好的视野,并允许获得圆柱形标本。生物网片用于关闭会阴部的缺损。与传统技术相比,经腹会阴联合切除直肠(extralevator abdominal perineal excision of the rectum,APER)能够提供更好的肿瘤学标本,并且减少了环周切缘的受累。结合腹腔镜方法,这也有可能改善术后恢复并降低发病率。

相似文献

1
Laparoscopic extralevator abdominal perineal excision of the rectum: the best of both worlds.腹腔镜下经会阴直肠肛门切除术:两全其美。
Tech Coloproctol. 2012 Feb;16(1):73-5. doi: 10.1007/s10151-011-0797-y. Epub 2011 Dec 15.
2
Laparoscopic extralevator abdominoperineal excision of the rectum: short-term outcomes of a prospective case series.腹腔镜经肛提肌外腹会阴直肠切除术:一项前瞻性病例系列研究的短期结果
Tech Coloproctol. 2014 May;18(5):445-51. doi: 10.1007/s10151-013-1071-2. Epub 2013 Oct 1.
3
Short-term outcomes of the modified extralevator abdominoperineal resection for low rectal cancer (with videos).改良经腹会阴联合直肠癌根治术治疗低位直肠癌的短期疗效(附视频)
Surg Endosc. 2016 Apr;30(4):1672-82. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4400-x. Epub 2015 Jul 17.
4
Laparoscopic Extralevator Abdominoperineal Excision of the Rectum with Primary Suturing: Short-Term Outcomes from Single-Institution Study.腹腔镜经肛提肌外腹会阴直肠切除术并一期缝合:单中心研究的短期结果
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2016 Jan;26(1):40-6. doi: 10.1089/lap.2015.0325.
5
Perineal and pelvic anatomy of extralevator abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer: cadaveric dissection.直肠癌经肛腹会阴联合切除术的会阴和盆腔解剖:尸体解剖。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2011 Sep;54(9):1179-83. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e318224256c.
6
A prospective case-control study of extralevator abdominoperineal excision (ELAPE) of the rectum versus conventional laparoscopic and open abdominoperineal excision: comparative analysis of short-term outcomes and quality of life.经肛门直肠低位前切除术(ELAPE)与传统腹腔镜和开腹经肛门直肠低位前切除术的前瞻性病例对照研究:短期结果和生活质量的比较分析。
Tech Coloproctol. 2012 Oct;16(5):355-62. doi: 10.1007/s10151-012-0851-4. Epub 2012 Jul 10.
7
Wound Complications and Perineal Pain After Extralevator Versus Standard Abdominoperineal Excision: A Nationwide Study.经肛提肌外与标准腹会阴联合切除术术后伤口并发症及会阴疼痛:一项全国性研究
Dis Colon Rectum. 2016 Sep;59(9):813-21. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000639.
8
A prospective multicenter clinical study of extralevator abdominoperineal resection for locally advanced low rectal cancer.局部晚期低位直肠癌经肛提肌外腹会阴联合切除术的前瞻性多中心临床研究
Dis Colon Rectum. 2014 Dec;57(12):1333-40. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000235.
9
Extralevator Abdominal Perineal Excision Versus Standard Abdominal Perineal Excision: Impact on Quality of the Resected Specimen and Postoperative Morbidity.经提肌外腹会阴切除术与标准腹会阴切除术:对切除标本质量和术后发病率的影响。
World J Surg. 2017 Aug;41(8):2160-2167. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-3963-1.
10
Extralevator abdominoperineal excision for advanced low rectal cancer: Where to go.晚期低位直肠癌的经肛提肌腹会阴联合切除术:何去何从。
World J Gastroenterol. 2020 Jun 14;26(22):3012-3023. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i22.3012.

引用本文的文献

1
Biological mesh reconstruction of the pelvic floor following abdominoperineal excision for cancer: A review.癌症经腹会阴切除术后盆底的生物网片重建:综述
World J Clin Oncol. 2017 Jun 10;8(3):249-254. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v8.i3.249.
2
Randomized controlled multicentre study comparing biological mesh closure of the pelvic floor with primary perineal wound closure after extralevator abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer (BIOPEX-study).一项随机对照多中心研究,比较直肠癌经肛提肌外腹会阴联合切除术后盆底生物补片封闭与一期会阴伤口缝合的效果(BIOPEX研究)。
BMC Surg. 2014 Aug 27;14:58. doi: 10.1186/1471-2482-14-58.
3
Single port-assisted fully laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection (APR) with immediate V-RAM flap reconstruction of the perineal defect.

本文引用的文献

1
Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer: long-term oncologic results.腹腔镜手术与开腹手术治疗直肠癌:长期肿瘤学结果
Ann Surg. 2009 Jul;250(1):54-61. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181ad6511.
2
The abdominoperineal resection itself is associated with an adverse outcome: the European experience based on a pooled analysis of five European randomised clinical trials on rectal cancer.经腹会阴联合切除术本身与不良预后相关:基于五项欧洲直肠癌随机临床试验汇总分析的欧洲经验。
Eur J Cancer. 2009 May;45(7):1175-1183. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.11.039. Epub 2009 Jan 6.
3
Evidence of the oncologic superiority of cylindrical abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer.
单孔辅助全腹腔镜腹会阴联合切除术(APR)联合即刻 V-RAM 皮瓣重建会阴缺损。
Updates Surg. 2012 Sep;64(3):217-21. doi: 10.1007/s13304-012-0158-z. Epub 2012 May 29.
柱状腹会阴联合切除术治疗低位直肠癌的肿瘤学优势证据。
J Clin Oncol. 2008 Jul 20;26(21):3517-22. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.14.5961. Epub 2008 Jun 9.
4
Extended abdominoperineal resection with gluteus maximus flap reconstruction of the pelvic floor for rectal cancer.扩大经腹会阴切除术联合臀大肌皮瓣重建盆底治疗直肠癌
Br J Surg. 2007 Feb;94(2):232-8. doi: 10.1002/bjs.5489.
5
The modern abdominoperineal excision: the next challenge after total mesorectal excision.现代腹会阴切除术:全直肠系膜切除术后的下一个挑战。
Ann Surg. 2005 Jul;242(1):74-82. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000167926.60908.15.