Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universidad de los Andes, CeiBA Complex systems Research Center, Carrera 1este # 19A 40, Bogotá, Colombia.
J Urban Health. 2012 Feb;89(1):153-70. doi: 10.1007/s11524-011-9628-8.
One promising public health intervention for promoting physical activity is the Ciclovía program. The Ciclovía is a regular multisectorial community-based program in which streets are temporarily closed for motorized transport, allowing exclusive access to individuals for recreational activities and physical activity. The objective of this study was to conduct an analysis of the cost-benefit ratios of physical activity of the Ciclovía programs of Bogotá and Medellín in Colombia, Guadalajara in México, and San Francisco in the U.S.A. The data of the four programs were obtained from program directors and local surveys. The annual cost per capita of the programs was: U.S. $6.0 for Bogotá, U.S. $23.4 for Medellín, U.S. $6.5 for Guadalajara, and U.S. $70.5 for San Francisco. The cost-benefit ratio for health benefit from physical activity was 3.23-4.26 for Bogotá, 1.83 for Medellín, 1.02-1.23 for Guadalajara, and 2.32 for San Francisco. For the program of Bogotá, the cost-benefit ratio was more sensitive to the prevalence of physically active bicyclists; for Guadalajara, the cost-benefit ratio was more sensitive to user costs; and for the programs of Medellín and San Francisco, the cost-benefit ratios were more sensitive to operational costs. From a public health perspective for promoting physical activity, these Ciclovía programs are cost beneficial.
促进身体活动的一项有前景的公共卫生干预措施是 Ciclovía 项目。Ciclovía 是一项定期的多部门社区为基础的项目,在此项目中,街道暂时禁止机动车通行,允许个人进行娱乐和身体活动。本研究的目的是分析哥伦比亚波哥大、麦德林、墨西哥瓜达拉哈拉和美国旧金山的 Ciclovía 项目的身体活动的成本效益比。四个项目的数据来自项目负责人和当地调查。四个项目的人均年度成本分别为:波哥大 6.0 美元,麦德林 23.4 美元,瓜达拉哈拉 6.5 美元,旧金山 70.5 美元。从身体活动带来的健康效益来看,波哥大的成本效益比为 3.23-4.26,麦德林为 1.83,瓜达拉哈拉为 1.02-1.23,旧金山为 2.32。对于波哥大的项目,成本效益比对骑自行车的活跃者的流行率更为敏感;对于瓜达拉哈拉,成本效益比对用户成本更为敏感;对于麦德林和旧金山的项目,成本效益比则对运营成本更为敏感。从促进身体活动的公共卫生角度来看,这些 Ciclovía 项目是具有成本效益的。