• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自行车/行人步道建设在促进健康方面的成本效益。

Cost effectiveness of a bicycle/pedestrian trail development in health promotion.

作者信息

Wang Guijing, Macera Caroline A, Scudder-Soucie Barbara, Schmid Tom, Pratt Michael, Buchner David

机构信息

Division of Nutrition and Physical Activity, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, 4770 Buford Highway NE, Mailstop K46, Atlanta, GA 30341-3717, USA.

出版信息

Prev Med. 2004 Feb;38(2):237-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2003.10.002.

DOI:10.1016/j.ypmed.2003.10.002
PMID:14715217
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A persistently low population level of physical activity is a challenge for public health. Data on cost effectiveness of environmental interventions are needed to inform the development and implementing of such interventions.

OBJECTIVE

To conduct cost-effectiveness analysis of bicycle/pedestrian trails.

DESIGN

The costs of trail development and number of users of four trails in Lincoln, NE, were obtained. The costs were adjusted to 2003 dollars. The physical activity-related outcomes/items are number of users who were more physically active since they began using the trails, number of users who were physically active for general health, and number of users who were physically active for weight loss. Cost-effectiveness measures were derived. Sensitivity analysis was performed.

RESULTS

The annual trail development cost US$289,035, 73% of which was construction cost. Of the 3,986 trail users, 88% were active at least 3 days a week. The average annual cost for persons becoming more physically active was US$98 (range US$65-253); the cost was US$142 (range US$95-366) for persons who are active for general health, and US$884 (range US$590-2,287) for persons who are active for weight loss.

CONCLUSION

This analysis provides basic cost-effectiveness measures of bicycle/pedestrian trails. Policymakers can use this information in making resource allocation decisions.

摘要

背景

人群身体活动水平持续偏低对公共卫生构成挑战。需要有关环境干预措施成本效益的数据,以为此类干预措施的制定和实施提供依据。

目的

对自行车道/人行道进行成本效益分析。

设计

获取了内布拉斯加州林肯市四条步道的建设成本和使用者数量。成本已按2003年美元进行调整。与身体活动相关的结果/项目包括:自开始使用步道以来身体活动增加的使用者数量、为总体健康而进行身体活动的使用者数量以及为减肥而进行身体活动的使用者数量。得出成本效益指标,并进行敏感性分析。

结果

步道每年的建设成本为289,035美元,其中73%为建设费用。在3,986名步道使用者中,88%每周至少活动3天。身体活动增加者的平均年度成本为98美元(范围为65 - 253美元);为总体健康而活动者的成本为142美元(范围为95 - 366美元),为减肥而活动者的成本为884美元(范围为590 - 2,287美元)。

结论

本分析提供了自行车道/人行道的基本成本效益指标。政策制定者可利用这些信息做出资源分配决策。

相似文献

1
Cost effectiveness of a bicycle/pedestrian trail development in health promotion.自行车/行人步道建设在促进健康方面的成本效益。
Prev Med. 2004 Feb;38(2):237-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2003.10.002.
2
Cost analysis of the built environment: the case of bike and pedestrian trials in Lincoln, Neb.建成环境的成本分析:以美国内布拉斯加州林肯市的自行车与行人试验为例
Am J Public Health. 2004 Apr;94(4):549-53. doi: 10.2105/ajph.94.4.549.
3
A cost-benefit analysis of physical activity using bike/pedestrian trails.使用自行车/行人道进行体育活动的成本效益分析。
Health Promot Pract. 2005 Apr;6(2):174-9. doi: 10.1177/1524839903260687.
4
Using a bicycle-pedestrian count to assess active living in downtown Wilkes-Barre.使用自行车-行人计数评估威尔克斯-巴里市中心的积极生活。
Am J Prev Med. 2012 Nov;43(5 Suppl 4):S399-402. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.06.029.
5
Characteristics of physical activity levels among trail users in a U.S. national sample.美国全国样本中步道使用者的身体活动水平特征。
Am J Prev Med. 2006 Nov;31(5):399-405. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2006.07.009.
6
Correlates of the Built Environment and Active Travel: Evidence from 20 US Metropolitan Areas.建成环境与积极出行的相关性:来自 20 个美国大都市地区的证据。
Environ Health Perspect. 2018 Jul 30;126(7):077011. doi: 10.1289/EHP3389. eCollection 2018 Jul.
7
Promoting physical activity in rural communities: walking trail access, use, and effects.促进农村社区的体育活动:步道的可达性、使用情况及效果
Am J Prev Med. 2000 Apr;18(3):235-41. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(99)00165-8.
8
The contribution of travel-related urban zones, cycling and pedestrian networks and green space to commuting physical activity among adults - a cross-sectional population-based study using geographical information systems.与出行相关的城市区域、自行车和行人网络以及绿地对成年人通勤体力活动的贡献——一项基于人群的横断面研究,采用地理信息系统
BMC Public Health. 2016 Aug 11;16(1):760. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3264-x.
9
Using crowd sourcing to locate and characterize conflicts for vulnerable modes.利用众包技术定位和描述脆弱模式的冲突。
Accid Anal Prev. 2019 Jul;128:32-39. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2019.03.014. Epub 2019 Apr 5.
10
Use of a community trail among new and habitual exercisers: a preliminary assessment.新锻炼者和习惯锻炼者对社区步道的使用:一项初步评估。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2004 Oct;1(4):A11. Epub 2004 Sep 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Estimating the Health Effects of Adding Bicycle and Pedestrian Paths at the Census Tract Level: Multiple Model Comparison.在普查区层面评估新增自行车道和人行道对健康的影响:多模型比较
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2022 Aug 24;8(8):e37379. doi: 10.2196/37379.
2
Field Test of a Passive Infrared Camera for Measuring Trail-Based Physical Activity.基于轨迹的身体活动被动式红外相机现场测试。
Front Public Health. 2021 Mar 17;9:584740. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.584740. eCollection 2021.
3
Cost-Effectiveness of Improvements to the Built Environment Intended to Increase Physical Activity.
改善建筑环境以增加身体活动的成本效益。
J Phys Act Health. 2019 May 1;16(5):308-317. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2018-0329. Epub 2019 Apr 13.
4
Rural Active Living: A Call to Action.乡村积极生活:行动呼吁。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2016 Sep-Oct;22(5):E11-20. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000333.
5
Do health benefits outweigh the costs of mass recreational programs? An economic analysis of four Ciclovía programs.大众休闲项目的健康效益是否超过其成本?对四个 Ciclovía 项目的经济分析。
J Urban Health. 2012 Feb;89(1):153-70. doi: 10.1007/s11524-011-9628-8.
6
Cost-effectiveness of interventions to promote physical activity: a modelling study.促进身体活动干预措施的成本效益:一项建模研究。
PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 14;6(7):e1000110. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000110.
7
Living near a trail is associated with increased odds of walking among patients using community clinics.居住在步道附近与使用社区诊所的患者增加步行几率相关。
J Community Health. 2006 Aug;31(4):289-302. doi: 10.1007/s10900-006-9014-8.
8
Use of a community trail among new and habitual exercisers: a preliminary assessment.新锻炼者和习惯锻炼者对社区步道的使用:一项初步评估。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2004 Oct;1(4):A11. Epub 2004 Sep 15.