The Doctors Company, Napa, CA, USA.
Am J Surg Pathol. 2012 Jan;36(1):e1-5. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e31823836bb.
Previously reported analyses of pathology malpractice claims reported to The Doctors Company from 1995 through 2003 uncovered repetitive patterns of specimen type and diagnostic category that contributed to claims. To determine whether these patterns had changed, 276 pathology malpractice claims from 2004 through 2010 were reviewed and are the subject of this report. Claims involving melanoma, breast (specimens and fine needle aspiration), system error, gynecologic cytology, and fine needle aspiration (excluding breast) accounted for 49% of the total claims. There has been a significant decline in the number of claims involving melanoma, breast, and gynecologic cytology, and the factors contributing to this decline are discussed.
先前报道的 1995 年至 2003 年期间向 The Doctors Company 报告的病理学医疗事故索赔分析揭示了导致索赔的标本类型和诊断类别重复出现的模式。为了确定这些模式是否发生了变化,对 2004 年至 2010 年的 276 例病理学医疗事故索赔进行了审查,这是本报告的主题。涉及黑素瘤、乳房(标本和细针抽吸)、系统错误、妇科细胞学和细针抽吸(不包括乳房)的索赔占总索赔的 49%。涉及黑素瘤、乳房和妇科细胞学的索赔数量显著下降,讨论了导致这种下降的因素。