Immunization Program, Office of Family Health, Public Health Division, State of Oregon Department of Human Services, Portland, OR 97232, USA.
Vaccine. 2012 Feb 1;30(6):1132-42. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.12.006. Epub 2011 Dec 14.
With vaccine-preventable diseases at record lows, few studies investigate rising parent-claimed exemptions to school immunization requirements. After finding exemption clusters in Oregon, we hypothesized that exemption risk factors may vary among communities. We surveyed parents to identify risk factors for exemptions and evaluated risk factor differences among communities with differing exemption rates.
Retrospective cohort study, multi-staged, population-proportionate sampling.
Parents of 2004-05 Oregon elementary school children (N=2900).
Parent-reported exemption status.
The response rate was 55%. Compared to vaccinators, exemptors were significantly more likely to have: strong vaccine concerns (weighted adjusted odds ratio (aOR)=15.3, 95% CI 6.4-36.7); "vaccine-hesitant" concerns (aOR=2.3; 95% CI 1.0-5.0); >1 childbirth(s) at a non-hospital, alternative setting (aOR=3.6; 95% CI 1.6-8.0); distrust of local doctors (aOR=2.7; 95% CI 1.0-7.5); reported chiropractic healthcare for their youngest school-age child (aOR=3.9; 95% CI 1.8-8.5); and reported knowledge of someone with a vaccine-hurt child (aOR=1.8; 95% CI 0.9-3.4). Exemptors were less likely to have "pro-vaccine" beliefs (aOR=0.2; 95% CI 0.0-0.6) and less likely to report relying on print materials (aOR=0.4; 95% CI 0.2-0.8). The strengths of association differed significantly for those with strong vaccine concerns and those reporting knowledge of someone with a vaccine-hurt child, depending on residence in exemption-rate areas, e.g., exemptors in medium-rate areas were more likely to have strong vaccine concerns (aOR=13.5; 95% CI 5.4-34.0) than those in high-rate areas (aOR=9.7; 95% CI 3.7-25.4).
Vaccine beliefs were important risk factors. That differing community-level exemption use modified the effects of several individual-level factors suggests that communities also influence parent decisions. Therefore, understanding community contexts and norms may be important when designing interventions.
随着可通过疫苗预防的疾病处于历史低位,很少有研究调查导致学校免疫接种要求豁免率上升的家长声称的原因。在俄勒冈州发现豁免群后,我们假设豁免风险因素在社区之间可能有所不同。我们调查了父母,以确定豁免的风险因素,并评估了具有不同豁免率的社区之间的风险因素差异。
回顾性队列研究,多阶段,按人口比例抽样。
俄勒冈州 2004-05 年小学儿童的家长(N=2900)。
父母报告的豁免状态。
响应率为 55%。与接种疫苗者相比,豁免者更有可能:对疫苗有强烈的担忧(加权调整后的优势比(aOR)=15.3,95%CI 6.4-36.7);“对疫苗犹豫不决”的担忧(aOR=2.3;95%CI 1.0-5.0);在非医院,替代场所分娩(aOR=3.6;95%CI 1.6-8.0);不信任当地医生(aOR=2.7;95%CI 1.0-7.5);报告对其最小的学龄儿童进行整脊保健(aOR=3.9;95%CI 1.8-8.5);并报告了解有疫苗伤害儿童的人(aOR=1.8;95%CI 0.9-3.4)。豁免者更不可能具有“支持疫苗”的信念(aOR=0.2;95%CI 0.0-0.6),并且更不可能报告依赖印刷材料(aOR=0.4;95%CI 0.2-0.8)。对于那些对疫苗有强烈顾虑的人和那些报告认识有疫苗伤害儿童的人,其关联强度差异显著,这取决于居住在豁免率较高的地区,例如,在中豁免率地区的豁免者更有可能对疫苗有强烈的顾虑(aOR=13.5;95%CI 5.4-34.0)比高豁免率地区(aOR=9.7;95%CI 3.7-25.4)。
疫苗信念是重要的危险因素。社区一级豁免使用的不同方式改变了一些个体因素的作用,这表明社区也影响了父母的决策。因此,了解社区背景和规范可能在设计干预措施时很重要。