Suppr超能文献

兽医研究中非传统(替代)疗法的文献计量学趋势分析。

Bibliometric trend analysis of non-conventional (alternative) therapies in veterinary research.

机构信息

Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal.

Departamento de Educação e Psicologia, Universidade de Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro, Vila Real, Portugal.

出版信息

Vet Q. 2022 Dec;42(1):192-198. doi: 10.1080/01652176.2022.2142318.

Abstract

There is an increased interest in Non-Conventional Therapies (NCTs), often referred to as complementary and alternative medicines, in veterinary clinical practice. To map the bibliometric outputs of NCTs in veterinary medicine, and identify which are most prevalent, and the extent to which their publishing has increased. Text mining algorithms were applied to detect 17 NCTs-related terms (, , , , , , , , , , , , , and ) in the title, abstract or keywords of all retrievable literature until 2020 under the PubMed MeSH term 'veterinary' ( = 377 556). Point prevalence, incidence by decade and cumulative incidence were calculated. Bibliometric trend analysis revealed an overall increase in NCTs-related terms over the last 20 years, with a substantial growth of studies mentioning , and , and have also increased in the same period, although their numbers remain low. Conversely, reference to has decreased in the last decade when compared with the previous decade, whereas references to , , and remained scarce, suggesting that their use in veterinary clinical practice may not be based on published evidence. Further reviews to explore this issue are warranted, differentiating secondary from primary literature, and assessing relevance and methodological quality of individual studies, following the principles of evidence-based veterinary medicine.

摘要

兽医临床实践中人们对非传统疗法(NCTs),通常被称为补充和替代医学,的兴趣日益增加。为了绘制兽医领域 NCTs 的文献计量学产出图,并确定哪些疗法最为常见,以及它们的出版量增加的程度。文本挖掘算法应用于检测标题、摘要或关键词中 17 个与 NCTs 相关的术语(,,,,,,,,,,,,和),直到 2020 年,在 PubMed MeSH 术语“兽医”( = 377 556)下可检索到所有文献。计算了点患病率、按十年计算的发病率和累积发病率。文献计量趋势分析显示,过去 20 年来,与 NCTs 相关的术语总体上呈上升趋势,提及 、、 和 的研究数量大幅增加,同期 、、 和 也有所增加,尽管数量仍然较低。相比之下,与前十年相比,过去十年中提到 的参考文献有所减少,而提到 、、 和 的参考文献仍然很少,这表明它们在兽医临床实践中的应用可能不是基于已发表的证据。进一步的综述需要探索这个问题,根据循证兽医医学的原则,区分二次和原始文献,并评估个别研究的相关性和方法学质量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6084/9662055/28237fd04c77/TVEQ_A_2142318_F0001_B.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验