Teagasc, Pig Development Department, Animal and Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, Co. Cork, Ireland.
Bioresour Technol. 2012 Feb;105:15-23. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2011.11.043. Epub 2011 Nov 20.
An economic analysis was performed on treatment options for pig manure in Ireland. Costs were based on a 500 sow integrated pig farm producing 10,500 m(3) of manure per year at 4.8% dry matter. The anaerobic digestion of pig manure and grass silage (1:1; volatile solids basis) was unviable under the proposed tariffs, with costs at € 5.2 m(-3) manure. Subsequent solid-liquid separation of the digestate would cost an additional € 12.8 m(-3) manure. The treatment of the separated solid fraction by composting and of the liquid fraction by integrated constructed wetlands, would add € 2.8 and € 4.6 m(-3) manure, respectively to the treatment costs. The cost analysis presented showed that the technologies investigated are currently not cost effective in Ireland. Transport and spreading of raw manure, at € 4.9 m(-3) manure (15 km maximum distance from farm) is the most cost effective option.
对爱尔兰猪粪处理方案进行了经济分析。成本基于每年生产 10500 立方米、干物质含量为 4.8%的猪粪的 500 头母猪一体化养猪场。按照拟议的关税,猪粪与草青贮(1:1;挥发性固体基础)的厌氧消化是不可行的,其成本为每立方米猪粪 5.2 欧元。随后对消化物进行固液分离将额外增加每立方米猪粪 12.8 欧元的成本。通过堆肥处理分离的固体部分,以及通过综合人工湿地处理液体部分,分别会使处理成本增加 2.8 欧元和 4.6 欧元/立方米猪粪。所提出的成本分析表明,所研究的技术目前在爱尔兰没有成本效益。运输和撒播未经处理的猪粪(距离农场不超过 15 公里,每立方米猪粪 4.9 欧元)是最具成本效益的选择。