Division of Microbiology and Immunology, Yerkes National Primate Research Center, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30329, United States.
Vaccine. 2012 Feb 21;30(9):1737-45. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.12.026. Epub 2011 Dec 15.
Vaccine regimens using different agents for priming and boosting have become popular for enhancing T cell and Ab responses elicited by candidate HIV/AIDS vaccines. Here we use a simian model to evaluate immunogenicity and protective efficacy of a recombinant modified vaccinia Ankara (MVA) vaccine in the presence and absence of a recombinant DNA prime. The simian vaccines and regimens represent prototypes for candidate HIV vaccines currently undergoing clinical testing.
Recombinant DNA and MVA immunogens expressed simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV)mac239 Gag, PR, RT, and Env sequences. Vaccine schedules tested inoculations of MVA at months 0, 2, and 6 (MMM regimen) or priming with DNA at months 0 and 2 and boosting with MVA at months 4 and 6 (DDMM regimen). Twelve weekly rectal challenges with the heterologous SIV smE660 were initiated at 6 months following the last immunization.
Both regimens elicited similar 61-64% reductions in the per challenge risk of SIVsmE660 transmission despite raising different patterns of immune responses. The DDMM regimen elicited higher magnitudes of CD4 T cells whereas the MMM regimen elicited higher titers and greater avidity Env-specific IgG and more frequent and higher titer SIV-specific IgA in rectal secretions. Both regimens elicited similar magnitudes of CD8 T cells. Magnitudes of T cell responses, specific activities of rectal IgA Ab, and the tested specificities for neutralization and antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity did not correlate with risk of infection. However, the avidity of Env-specific IgG had a strong correlation with the per challenge risk of acquisition, but only for the DDMM group.
We conclude that for the tested immunogens in rhesus macaques, the simpler MMM regimen is as protective as the more complex DDMM regimen.
使用不同的初始剂和加强剂来制定疫苗方案已成为增强候选 HIV/AIDS 疫苗引起的 T 细胞和 Ab 反应的热门方法。在这里,我们使用猿猴模型来评估重组改良安卡拉痘苗(MVA)疫苗在存在和不存在重组 DNA 初始剂的情况下的免疫原性和保护效力。这些猿猴疫苗和方案代表了目前正在进行临床测试的候选 HIV 疫苗的原型。
重组 DNA 和 MVA 免疫原表达了猿猴免疫缺陷病毒(SIV)mac239 Gag、PR、RT 和 Env 序列。测试的疫苗方案包括在 0、2 和 6 个月时接种 MVA(MMM 方案)或在 0 和 2 个月时接种 DNA 并在 4 和 6 个月时接种 MVA(DDMM 方案)。在最后一次免疫接种后 6 个月,开始每周进行 12 次直肠挑战,使用异源 SIVsmE660。
尽管引发了不同模式的免疫反应,但两种方案都引起了类似的 61-64%的 SIVsmE660 传播风险降低。DDMM 方案引起了更高幅度的 CD4 T 细胞,而 MMM 方案引起了更高的 Env 特异性 IgG 滴度和更高的亲和力以及更频繁和更高滴度的直肠分泌物中的 SIV 特异性 IgA。两种方案都引起了类似幅度的 CD8 T 细胞。T 细胞反应的幅度、直肠 IgA Ab 的特异性活性以及中和和抗体依赖性细胞毒性的测试特异性与感染风险无关。然而,Env 特异性 IgG 的亲和力与获得性挑战的风险有很强的相关性,但仅适用于 DDMM 组。
我们的结论是,对于恒河猴中的测试免疫原,更简单的 MMM 方案与更复杂的 DDMM 方案一样具有保护作用。