• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

交流评估工具(ABaCo):常模数据。

Assessment battery for communication (ABaCo): normative data.

机构信息

Center for Cognitive Science, Department of Psychology, University of Turin, Via Po 14, 10123 Turin, Italy.

出版信息

Behav Res Methods. 2012 Sep;44(3):845-61. doi: 10.3758/s13428-011-0174-9.

DOI:10.3758/s13428-011-0174-9
PMID:22180102
Abstract

The Assessment Battery for Communication (ABaCo) was introduced to evaluate pragmatic abilities in patients with cerebral lesions. The battery is organized into five evaluation scales focusing on separate components of pragmatic competence. In the present study, we present normative data for individuals 15-75 years of age (N = 300). The sample was stratified by age, sex, and years of education, according to Italian National Institute of Statistics indications in order to be representative of the general national population. Since performance on the ABaCo decreases with age and lower years of education, the norms were stratified for both age and education. The ABaCo is a valuable tool in clinical practice; the normative data provided here will enable clinicians to determine different kinds and specific levels of communicative impairments more precisely.

摘要

《交际评估电池》(ABaCo)被引入用于评估脑损伤患者的语用能力。该电池由五个评估量表组成,重点关注语用能力的不同组成部分。在本研究中,我们为 15-75 岁的个体(N=300)提供了常模数据。根据意大利国家统计局的指示,根据年龄、性别和受教育年限对样本进行分层,以代表全国一般人口。由于 ABaCo 的表现随着年龄和受教育年限的降低而降低,因此根据年龄和教育年限对常模进行了分层。ABaCo 在临床实践中是一种有价值的工具;这里提供的常模数据将使临床医生能够更准确地确定不同类型和特定水平的交际障碍。

相似文献

1
Assessment battery for communication (ABaCo): normative data.交流评估工具(ABaCo):常模数据。
Behav Res Methods. 2012 Sep;44(3):845-61. doi: 10.3758/s13428-011-0174-9.
2
Assessment Battery for Communication: development of two equivalent forms.沟通评估量表:两种等效形式的编制
J Commun Disord. 2012 Jul-Aug;45(4):290-303. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2012.03.002. Epub 2012 Mar 20.
3
Understanding the communicative impairments in schizophrenia: a preliminary study.了解精神分裂症中的沟通障碍:一项初步研究。
J Commun Disord. 2013 May-Jun;46(3):294-308. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2013.01.003. Epub 2013 Mar 6.
4
Brazilian version of the Protocole Montréal d'Evaluation de la Communication (Protocole MEC): normative and reliability data.《蒙特利尔沟通评估协议》巴西版本(MEC协议):规范及可靠性数据
Span J Psychol. 2008 Nov;11(2):678-88.
5
Communicative impairment in traumatic brain injury: a complete pragmatic assessment.创伤性脑损伤中的交流障碍:全面的语用评估
Brain Lang. 2008 Dec;107(3):229-45. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2008.01.002. Epub 2008 Feb 11.
6
Swedish norms for word fluency tests: FAS, animals and verbs.瑞典语单词流畅性测试规范:FAS、动物类词汇和动词类词汇。
Scand J Psychol. 2008 Oct;49(5):479-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2008.00653.x. Epub 2008 Apr 29.
7
Do executive function and theory of mind predict pragmatic abilities following traumatic brain injury? An analysis of sincere, deceitful and ironic communicative acts.执行功能和心理理论能否预测创伤性脑损伤后的语用能力?对真诚、欺骗和讽刺性交际行为的分析。
J Commun Disord. 2018 Sep-Oct;75:102-117. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2018.05.002. Epub 2018 May 26.
8
The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery, part 2: co-norming and standardization.精神分裂症认知功能成套测验共识认知电池,第2部分:共同常模制定与标准化。
Am J Psychiatry. 2008 Feb;165(2):214-20. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2007.07010043. Epub 2008 Jan 2.
9
Communicative-pragmatic disorders in traumatic brain injury: The role of theory of mind and executive functions.创伤性脑损伤中的交际-语用障碍:心理理论与执行功能的作用
Brain Lang. 2017 May;168:73-83. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2017.01.007. Epub 2017 Feb 3.
10
[NeuroCogFX--a computer-based neuropsychological assessment battery for the follow-up examination of neurological patients].[NeuroCogFX——一种用于神经科患者随访检查的计算机化神经心理学评估组合]
Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr. 2006 Nov;74(11):643-50. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-932162.

引用本文的文献

1
Longitudinal assessment of pragmatic and cognitive decay in healthy aging, and interplay with subjective cognitive decline and cognitive reserve.健康衰老过程中语用和认知衰退的纵向评估,以及与主观认知衰退和认知储备的相互作用。
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 22;15(1):30835. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-14062-4.
2
Assessing communicative-pragmatic ability in telehealth: e-ABaCo in autistic individuals.评估远程医疗中的交际语用能力:自闭症个体的电子ABaCo。
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Apr 28;16:1568108. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1568108. eCollection 2025.
3
Development and Validation of a Rapid Tool to Measure Pragmatic Abilities: The Brief Assessment of Pragmatic Abilities and Cognitive Substrates (APACS Brief).
一种测量语用能力的快速工具的开发与验证:语用能力和认知基础简要评估(APACS简要版)
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Jan 21;15(2):107. doi: 10.3390/bs15020107.
4
Protocol for the assessment of the development of pragmatic competencies in early childhood (PDP-PI).幼儿语用能力发展评估方案(PDP-PI)
Front Psychol. 2024 Dec 18;15:1368321. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1368321. eCollection 2024.
5
Looking for social pragmatic communication disorder in the complex world of Italian special needs: an exploratory study.在意大利特殊需求的复杂世界中寻找社会语用交流障碍:一项探索性研究。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 2;15(1):348. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-83280-z.
6
Can Narrative Skills Improve in Autism Spectrum Disorder? A Preliminary Study with Verbally Fluent Adolescents Receiving the Cognitive Pragmatic Treatment.自闭症谱系障碍患者的叙事技能能否提高?对接受认知语用治疗的语言流利青少年的初步研究。
J Psycholinguist Res. 2023 Oct;52(5):1605-1632. doi: 10.1007/s10936-023-09945-4. Epub 2023 May 8.
7
Differences in pragmatic communication skills of adults with intellectual disabilities and dual diagnoses.患有智力障碍和双重诊断的成年人在语用沟通技巧方面的差异。
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Feb 2;14:1072736. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1072736. eCollection 2023.
8
A cross-sectional study to assess pragmatic strengths and weaknesses in healthy ageing.一项评估健康老龄化人群语用能力强弱的横断面研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2022 Aug 23;22(1):699. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03304-z.
9
Searching for Best Predictors of Paralinguistic Comprehension and Production of Emotions in Communication in Adults With Moderate Intellectual Disability.寻找中度智力障碍成年人在交流中副语言对情绪的理解和表达的最佳预测因素。
Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 8;13:884242. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.884242. eCollection 2022.
10
The Company Prosodic Deficits Keep Following Right Hemisphere Stroke: A Systematic Review.公司韵律缺陷持续存在于右半球卒中后:一项系统综述。
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2022 Nov;28(10):1075-1090. doi: 10.1017/S1355617721001302. Epub 2022 Jan 6.