• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

幼儿语用能力发展评估方案(PDP-PI)

Protocol for the assessment of the development of pragmatic competencies in early childhood (PDP-PI).

作者信息

Junquera Cristina, Zubiauz Begoña

机构信息

Department of Developmental and Educational Psychology, Salamanca University, Salamanca, Spain.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2024 Dec 18;15:1368321. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1368321. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1368321
PMID:39749270
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11694176/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The design of a Protocol for the Assessment of the development of pragmatic competences in early childhood (PDP-PI) and the preliminary data obtained in a comparative study in 3-5-year-old school children are presented.

METHODS

The design of the protocol is based on a model of global understanding of pragmatics that considers essential to include linguistic, intersubjective and social aspects in order to make an adequate assessment of development. Based on the taxonomies of communicative functions, four basic competencies are described (Interactional, Referential, Subjective and Figurative). These competencies make it possible to categorize most of the linguistic emissions in early childhood. The PDP-PI presents two novelties with respect to other assessment systems: (a) it allows detecting the degree of a skill development (not only the presence/absence), (b) it includes items to assess the comprehension of pragmatics. The PDP-PI was used with 40 students of kindergarten education, divided into three groups according to school year.

RESULTS

The results- Duncan's test-confirm the existence of significant differences between the different age groups in all competencies, except for referential competence. Construct validity was assessed by means of an inter-rater test (Fleiss' Kappa = 0.76; Krippendorff's Alpha = 0.76), and content validity was assessed by analyzing the correlations between the four competencies of the protocol. Significant correlations were found between all the competencies, except the relationship between the Referential and Interactional competencies.

DISCUSSION

The data obtained in this study are preliminary, but they show that there is an evolution in the management of pragmatic skills, throughout early childhood, toward more complex and context-appropriate interactions. It is necessary to advance in procedures that discriminate against this evolution to establish developmental profiles which favor the detection of pragmatic difficulties or disorders at early ages.

摘要

引言

本文介绍了一项关于幼儿语用能力发展评估方案(PDP-PI)的设计以及在3至5岁学童的比较研究中获得的初步数据。

方法

该方案的设计基于一种语用学的整体理解模型,该模型认为为了对发展进行充分评估,必须纳入语言、主体间和社会方面。基于交际功能的分类法,描述了四种基本能力(互动、指称、主观和比喻)。这些能力使得对幼儿期的大多数语言表达进行分类成为可能。与其他评估系统相比,PDP-PI有两个新颖之处:(a)它能够检测技能发展的程度(不仅仅是存在/不存在),(b)它包括评估语用理解的项目。PDP-PI应用于40名幼儿园学生,根据学年分为三组。

结果

结果——邓肯检验——证实了除指称能力外,不同年龄组在所有能力上均存在显著差异。通过评分者间测试评估结构效度(Fleiss' Kappa = 0.76;Krippendorff's Alpha = 0.76),并通过分析方案的四种能力之间的相关性评估内容效度。除了指称能力和互动能力之间的关系外,所有能力之间均发现了显著相关性。

讨论

本研究获得的数据是初步的,但它们表明,在整个幼儿期,语用技能的管理朝着更复杂和更适合语境的互动发展。有必要改进能够区分这种发展的程序,以建立有助于在早期发现语用困难或障碍的发展概况。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9964/11694176/e708c95a1e47/fpsyg-15-1368321-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9964/11694176/47416906aa66/fpsyg-15-1368321-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9964/11694176/e708c95a1e47/fpsyg-15-1368321-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9964/11694176/47416906aa66/fpsyg-15-1368321-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9964/11694176/e708c95a1e47/fpsyg-15-1368321-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Protocol for the assessment of the development of pragmatic competencies in early childhood (PDP-PI).幼儿语用能力发展评估方案(PDP-PI)
Front Psychol. 2024 Dec 18;15:1368321. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1368321. eCollection 2024.
2
Pragmatic aspects of verbal communication in elderly people: A study of Polish seniors.老年人言语交流的实用方面:对波兰老年人的一项研究。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2020 Jul;55(4):493-505. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12532. Epub 2020 Mar 17.
3
Measuring inter-rater reliability for nominal data - which coefficients and confidence intervals are appropriate?测量名义数据的评分者间信度——哪些系数和置信区间是合适的?
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016 Aug 5;16:93. doi: 10.1186/s12874-016-0200-9.
4
Beyond the motor account of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: Verbal humour and its relationship with the cognitive and pragmatic profile.超越肌萎缩侧索硬化症的运动学解释:言语幽默及其与认知和语用特征的关系。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2020 Sep;55(5):751-764. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12561. Epub 2020 Jul 29.
5
Practitioner review: the assessment of language pragmatics.从业者综述:语言语用学评估
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2002 Nov;43(8):973-87. doi: 10.1111/1469-7610.00226.
6
What is the contribution of executive functions to communicative-pragmatic skills? Insights from aging and different types of pragmatic inference.执行功能对交际语用技能有何贡献?来自老龄化和不同类型语用推理的见解。
Cogn Process. 2021 Aug;22(3):435-452. doi: 10.1007/s10339-021-01021-w. Epub 2021 Mar 30.
7
A Distinction Between Linguistic and Social Pragmatics Helps the Precise Characterization of Pragmatic Challenges in Children With Autism Spectrum Disorders and Developmental Language Disorder.语言语用学与社会语用学的区分有助于精确刻画自闭症谱系障碍和发育性语言障碍儿童的语用挑战。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2020 May 22;63(5):1494-1508. doi: 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-19-00263. Epub 2020 May 7.
8
Exploring conceptual and theoretical frameworks for nurse practitioner education: a scoping review protocol.探索执业护士教育的概念和理论框架:一项范围综述方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):146-55. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2150.
9
Construction and validation of the Basic Scale of Entrepreneurial Competencies for the Secondary Education level. A study conducted in Spain.构建并验证中等教育水平创业能力基础量表。西班牙开展的一项研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 15;16(4):e0249903. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249903. eCollection 2021.
10
A qualitative systematic review of internal and external influences on shared decision-making in all health care settings.对所有医疗环境中共同决策的内部和外部影响进行的定性系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(58):4633-4646. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-432.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessing social-pragmatic inferencing skills in children with autism spectrum disorder.评估自闭症谱系障碍儿童的社会语用推理能力。
J Commun Disord. 2018 May-Jun;73:91-105. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2018.01.006. Epub 2018 Feb 2.
2
Narrative competence in Spanish-speaking adults with Williams syndrome.患有威廉姆斯综合征的西班牙语成年患者的叙事能力。
Psicothema. 2016 Aug;28(3):291-7. doi: 10.7334/psicothema2015.190.
3
[The Spanish adapted version of the Children's Communication Checklist identifies disorders of pragmatic use of language and differentiates between clinical subtypes].
[《儿童沟通检查表》的西班牙语改编版可识别语言语用障碍,并区分临床亚型]。
Rev Neurol. 2016;62 Suppl 1:S49-57.
4
Neural coding of assessing another person's knowledge based on nonverbal cues.基于非语言线索评估他人知识的神经编码。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2015 May;10(5):729-34. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsu111. Epub 2014 Aug 19.
5
Reliability and validity of the Pragmatics Observational Measure (POM): a new observational measure of pragmatic language for children.语用学观察量表(POM)的信度与效度:一种针对儿童的新语用语言观察量表
Res Dev Disabil. 2014 Jul;35(7):1588-98. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2014.03.050. Epub 2014 Apr 24.
6
Social communication disorder outside autism? A diagnostic classification approach to delineating pragmatic language impairment, high functioning autism and specific language impairment.自闭症谱系外的社会沟通障碍?以诊断分类方法划定语用语言障碍、高功能自闭症和特定语言障碍。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2013 Nov;54(11):1186-97. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12079. Epub 2013 May 3.
7
Pragmatics in action: indirect requests engage theory of mind areas and the cortical motor network.语用学的实践:间接请求激活心理理论区域和大脑皮质运动网络。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2012 Nov;24(11):2237-47. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00274. Epub 2012 Jul 31.
8
Assessment battery for communication (ABaCo): normative data.交流评估工具(ABaCo):常模数据。
Behav Res Methods. 2012 Sep;44(3):845-61. doi: 10.3758/s13428-011-0174-9.
9
Situation-sensitive use of insincerity: pathways to communication in young children.情境敏感地运用不诚实:幼儿沟通的途径。
Br J Dev Psychol. 2011 Nov;29(Pt 4):765-82. doi: 10.1348/2044-835X.002007. Epub 2010 Nov 29.
10
Children's understanding and production of verbal irony in family conversations.儿童在家庭对话中对言语反讽的理解和产生。
Br J Dev Psychol. 2010 Jun;28(Pt 2):255-74. doi: 10.1348/026151008x401903.