Rutgers University.
Int Migr. 2011;49(6):7-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2435.2011.00704.x.
In the West, economics and intimacy are assumed to occupy separate – even antithetical – domains. In Ghanaian family life, however, affection is understood to be expressed through the distribution of material resources across generations and a person’s life cycle. Such an understanding of love means that migrant parents who leave their children behind in Ghana can continue to be good parents by sending remittances, and, in fact, may be considered better parents than caregivers who stay and are poorer. This construction of love also means that children tend to attach themselves to more financially secure caregivers over those with fewer economic opportunities — to men in favour of women, to those abroad over those in Ghana. It is precisely because love is signalled through material exchanges that children long to be with parental migrants far away who support them and feel abandoned by those parents who do not. The intertwining of economic and emotional ties in Ghanaian transnational families has significant implications for policy, as discussed in the conclusion.
在西方,经济学和亲密关系被认为占据着不同的领域,甚至是对立的领域。然而,在加纳的家庭生活中,亲情被理解为通过在代际之间和一个人的一生周期中分配物质资源来表达。这种对爱的理解意味着,离开加纳的孩子的移民父母可以通过汇款继续成为好父母,事实上,他们可能比留下来但更贫穷的照顾者更被视为好父母。这种爱的构建也意味着,孩子们往往更倾向于依附于经济上更有保障的照顾者,而不是那些经济机会较少的照顾者——更倾向于男性而不是女性,更倾向于国外的而不是加纳国内的。正是因为爱通过物质交换来表达,所以孩子们渴望与远在他乡、支持他们的父母团聚,而对那些没有经济支持的父母感到失望。加纳跨国家庭中经济和情感纽带的交织对政策有重大影响,结论部分对此进行了讨论。