Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
J Policy Anal Manage. 2012 Winter;31(1):139-52. doi: 10.1002/pam.20629.
All industrialized countries are grappling with a common problem—how to provide assistance of various kinds to their rapidly aging populations. The problem for countries searching for models of efficient and high-quality long-term care (LTC) policies is that fewer than a dozen countries have government-organized, formal LTC policies. Relatively new surveys focused on the elderly populations of about 25 countries could become the basis for research on which LTC policy design choices have desired outcomes for individuals and society and might be replicable in other countries. As in earlier decades when U.S. researchers created the Current Population Survey (CPS) modules and the Survey of Income and Program Participation to answer policy questions, researchers and policy analysts are now at a point where a concerted effort is needed to generate questions that international comparative research on LTC could answer as well as the data needed to address the questions.
所有工业化国家都在努力解决一个共同的问题——如何为迅速老龄化的人口提供各种援助。对于那些正在寻找高效和高质量长期护理 (LTC) 政策模式的国家来说,问题在于,只有不到十几个国家有政府组织的正式 LTC 政策。相对较新的、针对大约 25 个国家的老年人口的调查可能成为研究的基础,这些研究可以确定哪些长期护理政策设计选择对个人和社会有理想的结果,并可能在其他国家复制。就像在更早的几十年里,美国研究人员创建了当前人口调查 (CPS) 模块和收入和计划参与调查来回答政策问题一样,研究人员和政策分析师现在需要共同努力,提出国际比较研究长期护理可以回答的问题,以及解决这些问题所需的数据。