Comment on "Heat transfer and fluid flow in microchannels and nanochannels at high Knudsen number using thermal lattice-Boltzmann method".

In this Comment we reveal the falsehood of the claim that the lattice Bhatnagar-Gross-Krook (BGK) model "is capable of modeling shear-driven, pressure-driven, and mixed shear-pressure-driven rarified [sic] flows and heat transfer up to Kn=1 in the transitional regime" made in a recent paper [Ghazanfarian and Abbassi, Phys. Rev. E 82, 026307 (2010)]. In particular, we demonstrate that the so-called "Knudsen effects" described are merely numerical artifacts of the lattice BGK model and they are unphysical. Specifically, we show that the erroneous results for the pressure-driven flow in a microchannel imply the false and unphysical condition that 6σKn<-1, where Kn is the Knudsen number σ=(2-σ(v))/σ(v) and σ(v)∈(0,1] is the tangential momentum accommodation coefficient. We also show explicitly that the defects of the lattice BGK model can be completely removed by using the multiple-relaxation-time collision model.