Aoyama Institute of Women's Medicine, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan Department of Dermatology, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Japan.
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2013 Mar;27(3):307-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2011.04385.x. Epub 2011 Dec 20.
Quality-switched (QS) lasers are well-known effective treatment for removing solar lentigines. However, the high incidence of post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation (PIH) raises concern in darker skin types. This is the first study comparing efficacies and incidences of PIH in Asian skin with different degrees of irradiation between two QS lasers.
In total, 355 solar lentigines in 193 cases, skin types III-V, were randomly divided into four groups. All cases received single laser treatment. Clinical results were evaluated after 4 weeks. Groups 1 and 3 were treated 'aggressively' with endpoints of very obvious immediate whitening (IW) of the lesion. Groups 2 and 4 were treated 'mildly' with endpoints of slight IW of the lesion. Groups 1 and 2 were irradiated with the QS ruby, and groups 3 and 4 with the QS frequency doubled Nd:YAG laser.
There were no statistically significant differences in degrees of clearance among the four groups. However, PIH incidences were very different: 33.33%, 7.47%, 23.18% and 8.47% in groups 1, 2, 3 and 4 respectively. The difference between aggressively and mildly irradiated groups (1 and 3 vs. 2 and 4) was statistically significant (P < 0.001). However, there was no statistical difference between the two aggressively or the two mildly irradiated groups. There were no significant differences between skin types.
Aggressive irradiation using QS lasers resulted in a high PIH incidence, while having no advantage in efficacy. For darker skin types, mild irradiation reduces the PIH risk with no disadvantage in efficacy.
调 Q 激光是治疗去除晒斑的有效方法。然而,炎症后色素沉着过度(PIH)的高发生率在肤色较深的人群中引起了关注。本研究首次比较了两种调 Q 激光在亚洲不同肤色人群中的疗效和 PIH 发生率。
共纳入 193 例 III-V 型皮肤的 355 处晒斑患者,随机分为 4 组。所有患者均接受单次激光治疗。4 周后评估临床疗效。组 1 和 3 采用终点为皮损即刻明显变白(IW)的“激进”治疗,组 2 和 4 采用终点为皮损轻度 IW 的“温和”治疗。组 1 和 2 采用调 Q 红宝石激光治疗,组 3 和 4 采用调 Q 倍频 Nd:YAG 激光治疗。
四组间皮损清除程度无统计学差异。但 PIH 发生率差异显著:组 1、2、3 和 4 分别为 33.33%、7.47%、23.18%和 8.47%。强烈和温和照射组(1 和 3 与 2 和 4)之间的差异具有统计学意义(P < 0.001)。然而,两种强烈或温和照射组之间无统计学差异。不同肤色之间无统计学差异。
使用调 Q 激光进行强烈照射会导致 PIH 发生率增加,但疗效无优势。对于肤色较深的患者,温和照射可降低 PIH 风险,且不影响疗效。