Vachiramon Vasanop, Panmanee Wikanda, Techapichetvanich Thanya, Chanprapaph Kumutnart
Division of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Lasers Surg Med. 2016 Apr;48(4):354-9. doi: 10.1002/lsm.22472. Epub 2016 Jan 12.
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Solar lentigines are benign pigmented lesions that occur mostly on sun-exposed areas. Q-switched and ablative lasers are effective for removing these lesions but the high incidence of postinflammatory hyperpigmentation raises concern in darker skin types. The objective of this study is to compare the efficacy and degree of postinflammatory hyperpigmentation with the Q-switched Nd:YAG and fractional carbon dioxide (CO2 ) laser for treatment of solar lentigines in Asians.
Twenty-five Thai patients (skin phototype III-IV) with at least two lesions of solar lentigines on upper extremities were enrolled in this study. Two lesions were randomly selected for the treatment with a single session of Q-switched Nd:YAG or fractional CO2 laser. Outcomes were evaluated using physician grading scale, colorimeter, and patient self-assessment at 6 and 12 weeks after treatment. Side effects were recorded.
A total of 532 nm Q-switched Nd:YAG laser showed significant improvement of pigmentation over fractional CO2 laser at 6th and 12th week by both colorimeter assessment and physician grading scale (P < 0.05). No significant difference in postinflammatory hyperpigmentation from both lasers was observed. In terms of patient self-assessment, 80% of the patients treated with 532 nm Q-switched Nd:YAG laser had excellent results compared to 8% in fractional CO2 laser group. However, fractional CO2 laser treatment had faster healing time and less pain score compared to Q-switched Nd:YAG laser.
Q-switched Nd:YAG is superior to fractional CO2 laser for treatment of solar lentigines but requires longer healing time and produces more pain. The incidence of postinflammatory hyperpigmentation was not significantly different with both lasers. Further studies are needed to obtain the proper parameter and the treatment frequency of fractional CO2 laser in solar lentigines.
背景/目的:日光性雀斑是一种良性色素沉着性病变,主要发生在暴露于阳光下的部位。调Q激光和剥脱性激光对去除这些病变有效,但炎症后色素沉着的高发生率在肤色较深的人群中引起了关注。本研究的目的是比较调Q Nd:YAG激光和超脉冲二氧化碳(CO2)激光治疗亚洲人日光性雀斑的疗效和炎症后色素沉着程度。
本研究纳入了25名泰国患者(皮肤光型为III-IV型),其上肢至少有两处日光性雀斑病变。随机选择两处病变,分别用单次调Q Nd:YAG激光或超脉冲CO2激光进行治疗。在治疗后6周和12周,使用医生评分量表、色度计和患者自我评估来评估疗效。记录副作用。
通过色度计评估和医生评分量表,在第6周和第12周时,532nm调Q Nd:YAG激光在色素沉着改善方面比超脉冲CO2激光有显著提高(P < 0.05)。两种激光在炎症后色素沉着方面未观察到显著差异。在患者自我评估方面,532nm调Q Nd:YAG激光治疗的患者中有80%效果极佳,而超脉冲CO2激光组为8%。然而,与调Q Nd:YAG激光相比,超脉冲CO2激光治疗的愈合时间更快,疼痛评分更低。
调Q Nd:YAG激光在治疗日光性雀斑方面优于超脉冲CO2激光,但愈合时间更长,疼痛更明显。两种激光的炎症后色素沉着发生率无显著差异。需要进一步研究以获得超脉冲CO2激光治疗日光性雀斑的合适参数和治疗频率。