• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估社区干预研究中匹配所带来的效率提升。

Assessing the gain in efficiency due to matching in a community intervention study.

作者信息

Freedman L S, Green S B, Byar D P

机构信息

Biometry Branch, DCPC, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland 20892.

出版信息

Stat Med. 1990 Aug;9(8):943-52. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780090810.

DOI:10.1002/sim.4780090810
PMID:2218196
Abstract

COMMIT (Community Intervention Trial for Smoking Cessation) is a randomized study employing a matched pairs design. Pairs of communities were selected on the basis of their geographical proximity and were chosen to be matched on variables strongly expected to relate to the outcome variable, the smoking quit rate. However, quantitative information was not available to evaluate the efficiency gain from matching. We have used baseline smoking quit rates in the communities as a surrogate for the outcome measure to evaluate the gain in efficiency from the matching. Our method takes account of the possible imperfection of the surrogate as a representative of the true outcome. The method estimates an efficiency gain of at least 50 per cent using the matched design. We also evaluate the further gains in efficiency which would be made by using the baseline quit rate to balance the randomization.

摘要

戒烟社区干预试验(COMMIT)是一项采用配对设计的随机研究。根据地理位置相近的原则选择成对的社区,并选择在与结果变量(戒烟率)密切相关的变量上进行匹配。然而,没有定量信息来评估匹配带来的效率提升。我们使用社区的基线戒烟率作为结果指标的替代指标,以评估匹配带来的效率提升。我们的方法考虑到了替代指标作为真实结果代表可能存在的不完美性。该方法估计,使用配对设计的效率提升至少为50%。我们还评估了使用基线戒烟率来平衡随机化所带来的进一步效率提升。

相似文献

1
Assessing the gain in efficiency due to matching in a community intervention study.评估社区干预研究中匹配所带来的效率提升。
Stat Med. 1990 Aug;9(8):943-52. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780090810.
2
The efficiency of the matched-pairs design of the Community Intervention Trial for Smoking Cessation (COMMIT).
Control Clin Trials. 1997 Apr;18(2):131-9. doi: 10.1016/s0197-2456(96)00115-8.
3
Aspects of statistical design for the Community Intervention Trial for Smoking Cessation (COMMIT).戒烟社区干预试验(COMMIT)的统计设计方面
Control Clin Trials. 1992 Feb;13(1):6-21. doi: 10.1016/0197-2456(92)90026-v.
4
Interplay between design and analysis for behavioral intervention trials with community as the unit of randomization.
Am J Epidemiol. 1995 Sep 15;142(6):587-93. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a117679.
5
The advantages of community-randomized trials for evaluating lifestyle modification.社区随机试验在评估生活方式改变方面的优势。
Control Clin Trials. 1997 Dec;18(6):506-13; discussion 514-6. doi: 10.1016/s0197-2456(97)00013-5.
6
Community Intervention Trial for Smoking Cessation (COMMIT): summary of design and intervention. COMMIT Research Group.社区戒烟干预试验(COMMIT):设计与干预概述。COMMIT研究小组
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1991 Nov 20;83(22):1620-8. doi: 10.1093/jnci/83.22.1620.
7
State and community tobacco-control programs and smoking-cessation rates among adult smokers: what can we learn from the COMMIT intervention cohort?州和社区烟草控制项目以及成年吸烟者的戒烟率:我们能从社区干预试验队列中学到什么?
Am J Health Promot. 2006 Mar-Apr;20(4):272-81. doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-20.4.272.
8
Comparative effectiveness of adding weight control simultaneously or sequentially to smoking cessation quitlines: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial.同时或序贯增加体重控制对戒烟热线的比较效果:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
BMC Public Health. 2016 Jul 22;16:615. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3231-6.
9
Quit and Win contests for smoking cessation.戒烟并获胜戒烟竞赛。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Apr 18(2):CD004986. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004986.pub2.
10
Randomization, matching, and propensity scores in the design and analysis of experimental studies with measured baseline covariates.在具有测量基线协变量的实验研究的设计和分析中使用随机化、匹配和倾向得分。
Stat Med. 2015 Feb 20;34(4):558-70. doi: 10.1002/sim.6361. Epub 2014 Nov 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Improving cancer prevention and control through implementing academic-local public health department partnerships - protocol for a cluster-randomized implementation trial using a positive deviance approach.通过建立学术机构与地方公共卫生部门的伙伴关系来改善癌症预防与控制——一项采用积极偏差方法的整群随机实施试验方案
Implement Sci Commun. 2025 Feb 24;6(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s43058-025-00706-z.
2
Simple compared to covariate-constrained randomization methods in balancing baseline characteristics: a case study of randomly allocating 72 hemodialysis centers in a cluster trial.与协变量约束随机化方法相比,在平衡基线特征方面更简单:一项在一项聚类试验中随机分配 72 个血液透析中心的案例研究。
Trials. 2021 Sep 15;22(1):626. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05590-1.
3
A multilevel approach for promoting physical activity in rural communities: a cluster randomized controlled trial.多层面方法促进农村社区的身体活动:一项群组随机对照试验。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Jan 30;19(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6443-8.
4
Methods for sample size determination in cluster randomized trials.整群随机试验中样本量确定的方法。
Int J Epidemiol. 2015 Jun;44(3):1051-67. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyv113. Epub 2015 Jul 13.
5
ADAPTIVE MATCHING IN RANDOMIZED TRIALS AND OBSERVATIONAL STUDIES.随机试验和观察性研究中的适应性匹配
J Stat Res. 2012 Dec 1;46(2):113-156.
6
Promoting state health department evidence-based cancer and chronic disease prevention: a multi-phase dissemination study with a cluster randomized trial component.促进州立卫生部门基于证据的癌症和慢性病预防工作:具有群组随机试验部分的多阶段传播研究。
Implement Sci. 2013 Dec 13;8:141. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-141.
7
The impact of HIV and high-risk behaviours on the wives of married men who have sex with men and injection drug users: implications for HIV prevention.HIV 和高危行为对男男性行为者和注射吸毒者已婚男性的妻子的影响:对 HIV 预防的启示。
J Int AIDS Soc. 2010 Jun 23;13 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S7. doi: 10.1186/1758-2652-13-S2-S7.
8
Community intervention trial for smoking cessation (COMMIT): II. Changes in adult cigarette smoking prevalence.戒烟社区干预试验(COMMIT):II. 成人吸烟率的变化
Am J Public Health. 1995 Feb;85(2):193-200. doi: 10.2105/ajph.85.2.193.
9
Community Intervention Trial for Smoking Cessation (COMMIT): I. cohort results from a four-year community intervention.戒烟社区干预试验(COMMIT):I. 四年社区干预的队列结果
Am J Public Health. 1995 Feb;85(2):183-92. doi: 10.2105/ajph.85.2.183.
10
Accounting for cluster randomization: a review of primary prevention trials, 1990 through 1993.群组随机化的考量:1990年至1993年初级预防试验综述
Am J Public Health. 1995 Oct;85(10):1378-83. doi: 10.2105/ajph.85.10.1378.