Australian Centre of Excellence for Risk Analysis, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic., Australia.
Transbound Emerg Dis. 2012 Jun;59(3):223-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1865-1682.2011.01258.x. Epub 2011 Dec 20.
Three web-based biosecurity intelligence systems - BioCaster, EpiSPIDER and HealthMap--are compared with respect to their ability to gather and analyse information relevant to public health. Reports from each system for the period 2-30 August 2010 were studied. The systems were compared to the volume of information that they acquired, their overlaps in this information, their timeliness, their sources, their focus on different languages and their focus on different geographical regions. Main results were as follows: EpiSPIDER obtains the most information and does so mainly through Twitter; no significant difference in systems' timeliness was found; there is a relatively small overlap between the systems (10-20%); the systems have significant differences in their ability to acquire information relevant to different countries, which may be due to the sources they use and the languages they focus on.
三种基于网络的生物安保情报系统——BioCaster、EpiSPIDER 和 HealthMap——在收集和分析与公共卫生相关信息的能力方面进行了比较。研究了每个系统在 2010 年 8 月 2 日至 30 日期间的报告。这些系统与它们获取的信息量、信息重叠、及时性、来源、对不同语言的关注以及对不同地理区域的关注进行了比较。主要结果如下:EpiSPIDER 获取的信息量最多,主要通过 Twitter 获取;各系统的及时性没有明显差异;各系统之间的信息重叠相对较小(10-20%);各系统获取不同国家相关信息的能力存在显著差异,这可能是由于它们使用的来源和关注的语言不同。