• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

去骨瓣减压术作为重度创伤性脑损伤患者挽救生命的急救手术的成本效益

Cost-effectiveness of decompressive craniectomy as a lifesaving rescue procedure for patients with severe traumatic brain injury.

作者信息

Ho Kwok M, Honeybul Stephen, Lind Christopher R P, Gillett Grant R, Litton Edward

机构信息

Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.

出版信息

J Trauma. 2011 Dec;71(6):1637-44; discussion 1644. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31823a08f1.

DOI:10.1097/TA.0b013e31823a08f1
PMID:22182872
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Decompressive craniectomy has been traditionally used as a lifesaving rescue procedure for patients with refractory intracranial hypertension after severe traumatic brain injury (TBI), but its cost-effectiveness remains uncertain.

METHODS

Using data on length of stay in hospital, rehabilitation facility, procedural costs, and Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) up to 18 months after surgery, the average total hospital costs per life-year and quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) were calculated for patients who had decompressive craniectomy for TBI between 2004 and 2010 in Western Australia. The Corticosteroid Randomisation After Significant Head Injury prediction model was used to quantify the severity of TBI.

RESULTS

Of the 168 patients who had 18-month follow-up data available after the procedure, 70 (42%) achieved a good outcome (GOS-5), 27 (16%) had moderate disability (GOS-4), 34 (20%) had severe disability (GOS-3), 5 (3%) were in vegetative state (GOS-2), and 32 (19%) died (GOS-1). The hospital costs increased with the severity of TBI and peaked when the predicted risk of an unfavorable outcome was about 80%. The average cost per life-year gained (US$671,000 per life-year) and QALY (US$682,000 per QALY) increased substantially and became much more than the usual acceptable cost-effective limit (US$100,000 per QALY) when the predicted risk of an unfavorable outcome was >80%. Changing different underlying assumptions of the analysis did not change the results significantly.

CONCLUSIONS

Severity of TBI had an important effect on cost-effectiveness of decompressive craniectomy. As a lifesaving procedure, decompressive craniectomy was not cost-effective for patients with extremely severe TBI.

摘要

背景

传统上,去骨瓣减压术一直被用作重度创伤性脑损伤(TBI)后难治性颅内高压患者的一种挽救生命的急救手术,但其成本效益仍不确定。

方法

利用2004年至2010年在西澳大利亚州接受TBI去骨瓣减压术患者的住院时间、康复机构、手术成本以及术后18个月的格拉斯哥预后量表(GOS)数据,计算每个生命年和质量调整生命年(QALY)的平均总住院成本。使用重度颅脑损伤后皮质类固醇随机化预测模型来量化TBI的严重程度。

结果

在术后有18个月随访数据的168例患者中,70例(42%)获得良好预后(GOS-5),27例(16%)有中度残疾(GOS-4),34例(20%)有重度残疾(GOS-3),5例(3%)处于植物人状态(GOS-2),32例(19%)死亡(GOS-1)。住院成本随着TBI严重程度的增加而增加,当预测不良预后风险约为80%时达到峰值。当预测不良预后风险>80%时,每获得一个生命年的平均成本(每生命年671,000美元)和QALY(每QALY 682,000美元)大幅增加,远超通常可接受的成本效益极限(每QALY 100,000美元)。改变分析的不同基础假设并未显著改变结果。

结论

TBI的严重程度对去骨瓣减压术的成本效益有重要影响。作为一种挽救生命的手术,去骨瓣减压术对极重度TBI患者不具有成本效益。

相似文献

1
Cost-effectiveness of decompressive craniectomy as a lifesaving rescue procedure for patients with severe traumatic brain injury.去骨瓣减压术作为重度创伤性脑损伤患者挽救生命的急救手术的成本效益
J Trauma. 2011 Dec;71(6):1637-44; discussion 1644. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31823a08f1.
2
Decompressive craniectomy for severe traumatic brain injury: the relationship between surgical complications and the prediction of an unfavourable outcome.严重创伤性脑损伤的减压性颅骨切除术:手术并发症与不良预后预测之间的关系
Injury. 2014 Sep;45(9):1332-9. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.03.007. Epub 2014 Mar 20.
3
Economic evaluation of decompressive craniectomy versus barbiturate coma for refractory intracranial hypertension following traumatic brain injury.创伤性脑损伤后减压性颅骨切除术与巴比妥类药物昏迷治疗难治性颅内高压的经济学评估
Crit Care Med. 2014 Oct;42(10):2235-43. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000500.
4
Cost-effectiveness of decompressive craniectomy in traumatic brain injuries.创伤性脑损伤去骨瓣减压术的成本效益分析。
Eur J Neurol. 2011 Apr;18(4):656-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2010.03294.x. Epub 2010 Dec 22.
5
Bilateral decompressive craniectomy for patients with malignant diffuse brain swelling after severe traumatic brain injury: a 37-case study.双侧去骨瓣减压术治疗严重颅脑创伤后恶性弥漫性脑肿胀患者:37 例研究。
J Neurotrauma. 2010 Feb;27(2):341-7. doi: 10.1089/neu.2009.1040.
6
Is aggressive treatment of traumatic brain injury cost-effective?创伤性脑损伤的积极治疗是否具有成本效益?
J Neurosurg. 2012 May;116(5):1106-13. doi: 10.3171/2012.1.JNS11962. Epub 2012 Mar 6.
7
Prognostic significance of abnormal hematological parameters in severe traumatic brain injury requiring decompressive craniectomy.需要去骨瓣减压术的严重创伤性脑损伤患者血液学参数异常的预后意义。
J Neurosurg. 2019 Feb 8;132(2):545-551. doi: 10.3171/2018.10.JNS182293. Print 2020 Feb 1.
8
Outcome following decompressive craniectomy for malignant swelling due to severe head injury.严重颅脑损伤所致恶性肿胀行去骨瓣减压术后的结果
J Neurosurg. 2006 Apr;104(4):469-79. doi: 10.3171/jns.2006.104.4.469.
9
Validation of the CRASH model in the prediction of 18-month mortality and unfavorable outcome in severe traumatic brain injury requiring decompressive craniectomy.验证 CRASH 模型在需要去骨瓣减压术的严重创伤性脑损伤患者 18 个月死亡率和不良结局预测中的应用。
J Neurosurg. 2014 May;120(5):1131-7. doi: 10.3171/2014.1.JNS131559. Epub 2014 Mar 7.
10
Prognostic significance of blood-brain barrier disruption in patients with severe nonpenetrating traumatic brain injury requiring decompressive craniectomy.需要进行减压颅骨切除术的严重非穿透性创伤性脑损伤患者血脑屏障破坏的预后意义。
J Neurosurg. 2014 Sep;121(3):674-9. doi: 10.3171/2014.6.JNS132838. Epub 2014 Jul 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost-effectiveness of craniotomy versus decompressive craniectomy for UK patients with traumatic acute subdural haematoma.开颅术与去骨瓣减压术治疗英国创伤性急性硬脑膜下血肿患者的成本效益比较。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jun 16;14(6):e085084. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085084.
2
Corticosteroid treatment for refractory intracranial hypertension: a rescue therapy in patients with severe traumatic brain injury with contusional lesions-a feedback.皮质类固醇治疗难治性颅内高压:对伴有挫伤性病变的重型颅脑损伤患者的一种挽救性治疗——反馈
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2023 Mar;165(3):717-725. doi: 10.1007/s00701-023-05507-8. Epub 2023 Feb 18.
3
Incremental cost of venous thromboembolism in trauma patients with contraindications to prophylactic anticoagulation: a prospective economic study.
创伤患者存在抗凝预防禁忌证时静脉血栓栓塞症的增量成本:一项前瞻性经济研究。
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2022 Jul;54(1):115-122. doi: 10.1007/s11239-021-02618-w. Epub 2022 Jan 6.
4
Functional outcome, in-hospital healthcare consumption and in-hospital costs for hospitalised traumatic brain injury patients: a Dutch prospective multicentre study.住院创伤性脑损伤患者的功能结局、住院医疗消耗及住院费用:一项荷兰前瞻性多中心研究
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2020 Jul;162(7):1607-1618. doi: 10.1007/s00701-020-04384-9. Epub 2020 May 14.
5
Surgical decision making in the setting of severe traumatic brain injury: A survey of neurosurgeons.严重创伤性脑损伤情况下的手术决策:神经外科医生调查。
PLoS One. 2020 Mar 2;15(3):e0228947. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228947. eCollection 2020.
6
In-hospital costs after severe traumatic brain injury: A systematic review and quality assessment.严重创伤性脑损伤后的住院费用:系统评价和质量评估。
PLoS One. 2019 May 9;14(5):e0216743. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216743. eCollection 2019.
7
Functional and patient-reported outcome versus in-hospital costs after traumatic acute subdural hematoma (t-ASDH): a neurosurgical paradox?创伤性急性硬脑膜下血肿(t-ASDH)后功能和患者报告结局与住院费用的比较:神经外科悖论?
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2019 May;161(5):875-884. doi: 10.1007/s00701-019-03878-5. Epub 2019 Mar 28.
8
Large retrospective study of artificial dura substitute in patients with traumatic brain injury undergo decompressive craniectomy.一项大型回顾性研究,探讨外伤性脑损伤患者行去骨瓣减压术后使用人工硬脑膜替代物的效果。
Brain Behav. 2018 Mar 25;8(5):e00907. doi: 10.1002/brb3.907. eCollection 2018 May.
9
Cost-Effectiveness of Craniotomy for Epidural Hematomas at a Major Government Hospital in Cambodia.柬埔寨一家主要政府医院开颅手术治疗硬膜外血肿的成本效益分析
World J Surg. 2017 Sep;41(9):2215-2223. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-4022-7.
10
Decompressive Craniectomy and Traumatic Brain Injury: A Review.减压性颅骨切除术与创伤性脑损伤:综述
Bull Emerg Trauma. 2013 Apr;1(2):60-8.