• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于持续肾脏替代治疗的尼亚加拉™导管与海豚®导管的比较。

A comparison of the Niagara™ and Dolphin® catheters for continuous renal replacement therapy.

作者信息

Kim Inbyung, Fealy Nigel, Baldwin Ian, Bellomo Rinaldo

机构信息

Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Austin Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

Int J Artif Organs. 2011 Nov;34(11):1061-6. doi: 10.5301/ijao.5000003.

DOI:10.5301/ijao.5000003
PMID:22183519
Abstract

PURPOSE

The choice of vascular access catheter may affect filter life during continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT); specifically, a new surface-modified catheter has been reported to possibly prevent thrombosis and catheter malfunction.

DESIGN AND SETTING

A sequential, controlled study in a tertiary ICU.

AIMS

To compare circuit life when CRRT was performed with a Bard®Niagara™ catheter or the surface-modified GamCath™ Dolphin® Protect 1320 catheter.

PATIENTS AND MEASUREMENTS

We studied 50 patients with acute kidney injury requiring CRRT, all delivered with catheters in the femoral position. We obtained information on age, gender, disease severity score (APACHE II and APACHE III), filter life, total heparin dose, hemoglobin concentration, platelet count, INR, and aPTT during CRRT.

RESULTS

We studied 341 circuits in 50 patients; 30 patients (140 circuits) used the Niagara and 20 patients (201 circuits) used the Dolphin catheter. Mean of circuit life in two groups was 14.9 hours and 13.1 hours, respectively (p=0.22). Patients using Niagara catheters had a more prolonged APTT (p<0.01) and lower platelet count (p=0.05), while heparin dose (p=0.22), and other anticoagulant treatment (p=0.73) were not significantly different. On Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, circuit life was not significant different between the two catheters (p=0.15).

CONCLUSIONS

The Niagara and Dolphin catheters appear to be broadly equivalent in terms of their impact on circuit life.

摘要

目的

在持续肾脏替代治疗(CRRT)期间,血管通路导管的选择可能会影响滤器寿命;具体而言,据报道一种新型表面改性导管可能预防血栓形成和导管故障。

设计与地点

在一家三级重症监护病房进行的一项序贯对照研究。

目的

比较使用巴德®尼亚加拉™导管或表面改性的GamCath™海豚®保护1320导管进行CRRT时的回路寿命。

患者与测量

我们研究了50例需要CRRT的急性肾损伤患者,所有患者均通过股静脉置管。我们获取了患者年龄、性别、疾病严重程度评分(急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统II和III)、滤器寿命、肝素总剂量、血红蛋白浓度、血小板计数、国际标准化比值(INR)以及CRRT期间活化部分凝血活酶时间(aPTT)等信息。

结果

我们研究了50例患者的341个回路;30例患者(140个回路)使用尼亚加拉导管,20例患者(201个回路)使用海豚导管。两组回路寿命的平均值分别为14.9小时和13.1小时(p = 0.22)。使用尼亚加拉导管的患者活化部分凝血活酶时间更长(p < 0.01),血小板计数更低(p = 0.05),而肝素剂量(p = 0.22)和其他抗凝治疗(p = 未找到具体对应内容,推测为0.73)无显著差异。根据Kaplan-Meier生存分析,两种导管的回路寿命无显著差异(p = 0.15)。

结论

尼亚加拉导管和海豚导管在对回路寿命的影响方面似乎大致相当。

相似文献

1
A comparison of the Niagara™ and Dolphin® catheters for continuous renal replacement therapy.用于持续肾脏替代治疗的尼亚加拉™导管与海豚®导管的比较。
Int J Artif Organs. 2011 Nov;34(11):1061-6. doi: 10.5301/ijao.5000003.
2
A comparison of the Niagara and Medcomp catheters for continuous renal replacement therapy.尼加拉瓜和 Medcomp 导管在连续肾脏替代治疗中的比较。
Ren Fail. 2013;35(3):308-13. doi: 10.3109/0886022X.2012.757823. Epub 2013 Jan 29.
3
Use of saline flush to prevent filter clotting in continuous renal replacement therapy without anticoagulant.
J Med Assoc Thai. 2011 Feb;94 Suppl 1:S105-10.
4
A controlled trial of low-molecular-weight heparin (dalteparin) versus unfractionated heparin as anticoagulant during continuous venovenous hemodialysis with filtration.低分子量肝素(达肝素)与普通肝素在连续性静脉-静脉血液透析滤过中作为抗凝剂的对照试验。
Crit Care Med. 1999 Oct;27(10):2224-8. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199910000-00026.
5
Conventional coagulation and thromboelastograph parameters and longevity of continuous renal replacement circuits.传统凝血和血栓弹力图参数以及连续性肾脏替代治疗回路的使用寿命
Intensive Care Med. 2002 Nov;28(11):1649-55. doi: 10.1007/s00134-002-1506-0. Epub 2002 Oct 8.
6
Continuous veno-venous hemofiltration without anticoagulation in high-risk patients.高危患者无抗凝的持续静脉-静脉血液滤过
Intensive Care Med. 2000 Nov;26(11):1652-7. doi: 10.1007/s001340000691.
7
Faster Blood Flow Rate Does Not Improve Circuit Life in Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.更快的血流速度并不能改善持续肾脏替代治疗中的体外循环寿命:一项随机对照试验。
Crit Care Med. 2017 Oct;45(10):e1018-e1025. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002568.
8
Vascular Access in Patients Treated with Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy: A Report from a Single Center in China.接受持续肾脏替代治疗患者的血管通路:来自中国一家单中心的报告。
Ther Apher Dial. 2019 Dec;23(6):562-569. doi: 10.1111/1744-9987.12799. Epub 2019 Apr 14.
9
[The effect of AN69 ST membrane on filter lifetime in continuous renal replacement therapy without anticoagulation in patients with high risk of bleeding].[AN69 ST膜对出血高风险患者在无抗凝的连续性肾脏替代治疗中滤器使用寿命的影响]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2015 May;27(5):343-8. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2015.05.005.
10
Circuit lifespan during continuous renal replacement therapy for combined liver and kidney failure.连续性肾脏替代治疗联合肝肾衰竭患者的体外循环寿命。
J Crit Care. 2012 Dec;27(6):744.e7-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2012.08.016. Epub 2012 Oct 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative evaluation of straight and curved extension dialysis catheters for continuous renal replacement therapy in dogs with acute kidney injury.用于急性肾损伤犬连续肾脏替代治疗的直型和弯型延长透析导管的比较评估
Iran J Vet Res. 2023;24(4):335-338. doi: 10.22099/IJVR.2023.47626.6883.
2
The Association Between Catheter Type and Dialysis Treatment: A Retrospective Data Analysis at Two U.S.-Based ICUs.导管类型与透析治疗之间的关联:基于美国两家重症监护病房的回顾性数据分析
Crit Care Explor. 2023 Jan 6;5(1):e0795. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000795. eCollection 2023 Jan.
3
Non anti-coagulant factors associated with filter life in continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT): a systematic review and meta-analysis.
连续肾脏替代治疗(CRRT)中与滤器寿命相关的非抗凝因素:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Nephrol. 2017 Feb 20;18(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s12882-017-0445-5.