School of Medicine and Pharmacology, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia.
Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 2011 Sep-Dec;48(5-6):250-68. doi: 10.3109/10408363.2011.641517.
Genetic variations, in part, determine individual susceptibility to sepsis and pneumonia. Advances in genetic sequence analysis as well as high throughput platform analysis of gene expression has allowed for a better understanding of immunopathogenesis during sepsis. Differences in genes can also modulate immune and inflammatory response during sepsis thereby translating to differences in clinical outcomes. An increasing number of candidate genes have been implicated to play a role in sepsis susceptibility, most of which are controversial with few exceptions. This does not refute the significance of genetic polymorphisms in sepsis, but rather highlights the difficulties and pitfalls related to genetic association studies. These difficulties include differences in study design such as heterogeneous patient cohorts and differences in pathogenic organisms, linkage disequilibrium, and lack of power for detailed haplotype analysis or examination of gene-gene interactions. There is extensive diversity in the pathways of inflammation and immune response during sepsis making it even harder to prove the functional and clinical significance of one single genetic polymorphism which could be easily masqueraded or compensated by other upstream or downstream events of the pathway involved. The majority of studies have analysed candidate genes in isolation from other possible polymorphisms. It is likely that susceptibility to sepsis is the result of polymorphisms from multiple genes rather than one single mutation. Future studies should aim for multi-centered collaborative approach looking at genome wide association or gene profiling to provide a more complete appraisal of the key genetic players in determining genetic susceptibility to sepsis. This review paper will summarise the prominent candidate gene polymorphisms with known functional changes or those with haplotype data. In addition, a summary of the expanding research in the field of epigenetics and post-sepsis immunosuppression will be discussed.
遗传变异在一定程度上决定了个体对败血症和肺炎的易感性。遗传序列分析的进步以及基因表达的高通量平台分析,使人们能够更好地了解败血症期间的免疫发病机制。基因的差异也可以调节败血症期间的免疫和炎症反应,从而导致临床结果的差异。越来越多的候选基因被认为与败血症易感性有关,其中大多数都存在争议,只有少数例外。这并不是要否定遗传多态性在败血症中的重要性,而是要强调与遗传关联研究相关的困难和陷阱。这些困难包括研究设计的差异,如异质的患者队列和致病生物体的差异、连锁不平衡以及缺乏详细单倍型分析或检查基因-基因相互作用的能力。败血症期间炎症和免疫反应的途径存在广泛的多样性,这使得证明一个单一遗传多态性的功能和临床意义更加困难,因为它很容易被途径中涉及的其他上游或下游事件掩盖或补偿。大多数研究都是孤立地分析候选基因,而不是与其他可能的多态性一起分析。败血症的易感性可能是多个基因的多态性而不是一个单一突变的结果。未来的研究应该采用多中心协作的方法,研究全基因组关联或基因谱,以更全面地评估决定败血症遗传易感性的关键遗传因素。本文综述了具有已知功能变化或具有单倍型数据的显著候选基因多态性。此外,还将讨论扩大研究领域的表观遗传学和败血症后免疫抑制的研究进展。