• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

帮助孕妇做出更好的决策:对产科患者决策辅助工具益处的系统评价

Helping pregnant women make better decisions: a systematic review of the benefits of patient decision aids in obstetrics.

作者信息

Say Rebecca, Robson Stephen, Thomson Richard

机构信息

Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2011 Dec 21;1(2):e000261. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000261. Print 2011.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000261
PMID:22189349
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3334824/
Abstract

Objectives Patient decision aids can be used to support pregnant women engaging in shared decisions, but little is known about their effects in obstetrics. The authors aimed to evaluate the effects of patient decision aids designed for pregnant women on clinical and psychosocial outcomes. Design Systematic review. Data on all outcomes were extracted and summarised. All studies were critically appraised for potential sources of bias and, when possible to obtain, the reported decision aids were evaluated. Meta-analysis was not possible due to the heterogeneity of outcomes in primary studies and the small number of studies. Data sources Electronic searches were performed using Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Library and Medion databases from inception until December 2010. Reference lists of all included articles were also examined and key experts contacted. Eligibility criteria for selecting studies Eligibility criteria included randomised controlled trials, which reported on patient decision aids for women facing any treatment decision in pregnancy published in English. Studies evaluating health education material that did not address women's values and preferences were excluded. Results Patient decision aids have been developed for decisions about prenatal testing, vaginal birth after Caesarean section, external cephalic version and labour analgesia. Use of decision aids is associated with a number of positive effects including reduced anxiety, lower decisional conflict, improved knowledge, improved satisfaction and increased perception of having made an informed choice. Conclusions Patient decision aids have the potential to improve obstetric care. However, currently the evidence base is limited by the small number of studies, the quality of the studies and because they involved heterogeneous decision aids, patient groups and outcomes.

摘要

目标 患者决策辅助工具可用于支持孕妇参与共同决策,但对其在产科中的效果了解甚少。作者旨在评估为孕妇设计的患者决策辅助工具对临床和心理社会结局的影响。

设计 系统评价。提取并总结所有结局的数据。对所有研究进行严格评估以查找潜在的偏倚来源,并在可能的情况下对报告的决策辅助工具进行评估。由于原始研究中结局的异质性以及研究数量较少,无法进行荟萃分析。

数据来源 使用Medline、Embase、Cochrane图书馆和Medion数据库进行电子检索,检索时间从数据库建立至2010年12月。还检查了所有纳入文章的参考文献列表并联系了关键专家。

选择研究的纳入标准 纳入标准包括随机对照试验,这些试验报告了以英文发表的针对面临孕期任何治疗决策的女性的患者决策辅助工具。评估未涉及女性价值观和偏好的健康教育材料的研究被排除。

结果 已开发出针对产前检查、剖宫产术后阴道分娩、外倒转术和分娩镇痛决策的患者决策辅助工具。使用决策辅助工具与许多积极效果相关,包括焦虑减轻、决策冲突降低、知识改善、满意度提高以及对做出明智选择的认知增加。

结论 患者决策辅助工具有潜力改善产科护理。然而,目前证据基础受到研究数量少、研究质量以及研究涉及异质性决策辅助工具、患者群体和结局的限制。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/27eb/3334824/52f36aa96a05/bmjopen-2011-000261fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/27eb/3334824/52f36aa96a05/bmjopen-2011-000261fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/27eb/3334824/52f36aa96a05/bmjopen-2011-000261fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Helping pregnant women make better decisions: a systematic review of the benefits of patient decision aids in obstetrics.帮助孕妇做出更好的决策:对产科患者决策辅助工具益处的系统评价
BMJ Open. 2011 Dec 21;1(2):e000261. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000261. Print 2011.
2
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.为面临医疗治疗或筛查决策的人们提供的决策辅助工具。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Oct 5(10):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub3.
3
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.为面临医疗治疗或筛查决策的人群提供的决策辅助工具。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jul 8(3):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub2.
4
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.为面临健康治疗或筛查决策的人群提供的决策辅助工具。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jan 28(1):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub4.
5
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.为面临医疗治疗或筛查决策的人们提供的决策辅助工具。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001(3):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.
6
Decision aids for prenatal testing: A systematic review and meta-analysis.产前检测决策辅助工具:系统评价与荟萃分析
J Adv Nurs. 2021 Oct;77(10):3964-3979. doi: 10.1111/jan.14875. Epub 2021 May 3.
7
Women-centred interventions to increase vaginal birth after caesarean section (VBAC): A systematic review.以女性为中心的增加剖宫产术后阴道分娩(VBAC)的干预措施:一项系统评价。
Midwifery. 2015 Jul;31(7):657-63. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2015.04.003. Epub 2015 Apr 15.
8
Hypnosis for pain management during labour and childbirth.分娩过程中疼痛管理的催眠疗法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 May 19;2016(5):CD009356. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009356.pub3.
9
10
Non-clinical interventions for reducing unnecessary caesarean section.减少不必要剖宫产的非临床干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Jun 15(6):CD005528. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005528.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of birth plans integrated into childbirth preparation classes on maternal and neonatal outcomes of Iranian women: A randomized controlled trial.纳入分娩准备课程的分娩计划对伊朗妇女母婴结局的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Front Glob Womens Health. 2023 Apr 6;4:1120335. doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2023.1120335. eCollection 2023.
2
Effectiveness of Interactive Digital Decision Aids in Prenatal Screening Decision-making: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.交互式数字决策辅助工具在产前筛查决策中的有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Mar 14;25:e37953. doi: 10.2196/37953.
3
Co-designing a theory-informed intervention to increase shared decision-making in maternity care.

本文引用的文献

1
Implementing shared decision making in the UK.在英国实施共同决策。
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2011;105(4):300-4. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2011.04.014. Epub 2011 Apr 29.
2
Implementing shared decision making in the NHS.在英国国家医疗服务体系中实施共同决策。
BMJ. 2010 Oct 14;341:c5146. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c5146.
3
Assisting informed decision making for labour analgesia: a randomised controlled trial of a decision aid for labour analgesia versus a pamphlet.协助分娩镇痛知情决策:分娩镇痛决策辅助工具与宣传册随机对照试验
共同设计一项基于理论的干预措施,以增加产妇护理中的共同决策。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2023 Jan 31;21(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s12961-023-00959-x.
4
Development and pilot test of a pregnancy decision making tool for women with physical disabilities.为身体残疾女性开发并试行怀孕决策工具。
Health Serv Res. 2023 Feb;58(1):223-233. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14103. Epub 2022 Nov 30.
5
Shared Decision-Making Tool for Treatment of Perinatal Opioid Use Disorder.围产期阿片类药物使用障碍治疗的共同决策工具
Psychiatr Res Clin Pract. 2019 Jan 8;1(1):27-31. doi: 10.1176/appi.prcp.20180004. eCollection 2019 Apr.
6
A Novel Decision Aid Improves Quality of Reproductive Decision-Making and Pregnancy Knowledge for Women with Inflammatory Bowel Disease.一种新型决策辅助工具可提高炎症性肠病女性的生殖决策质量和妊娠知识水平。
Dig Dis Sci. 2022 Sep;67(9):4303-4314. doi: 10.1007/s10620-022-07494-9. Epub 2022 Apr 30.
7
Improving communication and teamwork during labor: A feasibility, acceptability, and safety study.改善分娩期间的沟通和团队合作:一项可行性、可接受性和安全性研究。
Birth. 2022 Dec;49(4):637-647. doi: 10.1111/birt.12630. Epub 2022 Mar 1.
8
Implementation strategies within a complex environment: A qualitative study of a shared decision-making intervention during childbirth.复杂环境下的实施策略:一项关于分娩过程中共享决策干预的定性研究。
Birth. 2022 Sep;49(3):440-454. doi: 10.1111/birt.12611. Epub 2022 Jan 7.
9
Knowledge, Information Sources, and Institutional Trust of Patients Regarding Medication Use in Pregnancy: A Systematic Review.孕妇用药的知识、信息来源及机构信任:一项系统综述
J Family Reprod Health. 2021 Sep;15(3):160-171. doi: 10.18502/jfrh.v15i3.7133.
10
Effect of Shared Decision-making on Anxiety of Women Recommended for Prenatal Screening Tests in Southeast of Iran.共同决策对伊朗东南部推荐进行产前筛查试验的女性焦虑情绪的影响。
J Family Reprod Health. 2020 Sep;14(3):192-197. doi: 10.18502/jfrh.v14i3.4673.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2010 Apr 8;10:15. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-10-15.
4
Do audio-guided decision aids improve outcomes? A randomized controlled trial of an audio-guided decision aid compared with a booklet decision aid for Australian women considering labour analgesia.音频引导式决策辅助工具是否能改善结果?一项比较音频引导式决策辅助工具与小册子式决策辅助工具对澳大利亚女性分娩镇痛选择影响的随机对照试验。
Health Expect. 2009 Dec;12(4):407-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2009.00553.x. Epub 2009 Aug 26.
5
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.系统评价与Meta分析优先报告条目:PRISMA声明
PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000097. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097.
6
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.为面临医疗治疗或筛查决策的人群提供的决策辅助工具。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jul 8(3):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub2.
7
Healthcare professionals' views on two computer-based decision aids for women choosing mode of delivery after previous caesarean section: a qualitative study.医疗保健专业人员对两种基于计算机的决策辅助工具的看法,这两种工具用于曾接受剖宫产的女性选择分娩方式:一项定性研究。
BJOG. 2009 Jun;116(7):906-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02121.x.
8
Providing information to pregnant women: how, what and where?向孕妇提供信息:方式、内容及地点?
BJOG. 2009 Jun;116(7):877-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02176.x.
9
Women's views on the use of decision aids for decision making about the method of delivery following a previous caesarean section: qualitative interview study.关于先前剖宫产术后分娩方式决策辅助工具使用的女性观点:定性访谈研究
BJOG. 2009 Jun;116(7):896-905. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02120.x. Epub 2009 Apr 7.
10
Assessing the quality of decision support technologies using the International Patient Decision Aid Standards instrument (IPDASi).使用国际患者决策辅助标准工具(IPDASi)评估决策支持技术的质量。
PLoS One. 2009;4(3):e4705. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004705. Epub 2009 Mar 4.