以女性为中心的增加剖宫产术后阴道分娩(VBAC)的干预措施:一项系统评价。

Women-centred interventions to increase vaginal birth after caesarean section (VBAC): A systematic review.

作者信息

Nilsson Christina, Lundgren Ingela, Smith Valerie, Vehvilainen-Julkunen Katri, Nicoletti Jane, Devane Declan, Bernloehr Annette, van Limbeek Evelien, Lalor Joan, Begley Cecily

机构信息

Institute of Health and Care Sciences, The Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Box 457, SE-405 30 Gothenburg, Sweden.

School of Nursing and Midwifery, Trinity College Dublin, 24 D'Olier Street, Dublin 2, Ireland.

出版信息

Midwifery. 2015 Jul;31(7):657-63. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2015.04.003. Epub 2015 Apr 15.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

to evaluate the effectiveness of women-centred interventions during pregnancy and birth to increase rates of vaginal birth after caesarean.

DESIGN

we searched bibliographic databases for randomised trials or cluster randomised trials on women-centred interventions during pregnancy and birth designed to increase VBAC rates in women with at least one previous caesarean section. Comparator groups included standard or usual care or an alternative treatment aimed at increasing VBAC rates. The methodological quality of included studies was assessed independently by two authors using the Effective Public Health Practice Project quality assessment tool. Outcome data were extracted independently from each included study by two review authors.

FINDINGS

in total, 821 citations were identified and screened by title and abstract; 806 were excluded and full text of 15 assessed. Of these, 12 were excluded leaving three papers included in the review. Two studies evaluated the effectiveness of decision aids for mode of birth and one evaluated the effectiveness of an antenatal education programme. The findings demonstrate that neither the use of decision aids nor information/education of women have a significant effect on VBAC rates. Nevertheless, decision-aids significantly decrease women's decisional conflict about mode of birth, and information programmes significantly increase their knowledge about the risks and benefits of possible modes of birth.

KEY CONCLUSIONS

few studies evaluated women-centred interventions designed to improve VBAC rates, and all interventions were applied in pregnancy only, none during the birth. There is an urgent need to develop and evaluate the effectiveness of all types of women-centred interventions during pregnancy and birth, designed to improve VBAC rates.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

decision-aids and information programmes during pregnancy should be provided for women as, even though they do not affect the rate of VBAC, they decrease women's decisional conflict and increase their knowledge about possible modes of birth.

摘要

目的

评估孕期及分娩期间以女性为中心的干预措施对提高剖宫产术后阴道分娩率的有效性。

设计

我们检索了文献数据库,以查找关于孕期及分娩期间以女性为中心的干预措施的随机试验或整群随机试验,这些干预措施旨在提高至少有一次剖宫产史的女性的阴道分娩率。对照组包括标准或常规护理或旨在提高阴道分娩率的替代治疗。两名作者使用有效公共卫生实践项目质量评估工具独立评估纳入研究的方法学质量。两名综述作者独立从每项纳入研究中提取结局数据。

结果

共识别并筛选了821篇标题和摘要;排除806篇,对15篇进行全文评估。其中,排除12篇,3篇论文纳入综述。两项研究评估了分娩方式决策辅助工具的有效性,一项研究评估了产前教育项目的有效性。研究结果表明,使用决策辅助工具和对女性进行信息/教育对阴道分娩率均无显著影响。然而,决策辅助工具显著降低了女性在分娩方式上的决策冲突,信息项目显著增加了她们对可能分娩方式的风险和益处的了解。

主要结论

很少有研究评估旨在提高阴道分娩率的以女性为中心的干预措施,且所有干预措施仅应用于孕期,分娩期间均未应用。迫切需要开发并评估孕期及分娩期间所有类型的以女性为中心的干预措施的有效性,以提高阴道分娩率。

对实践的启示

应为孕期女性提供决策辅助工具和信息项目,因为尽管它们不影响阴道分娩率,但可减少女性的决策冲突并增加她们对可能分娩方式的了解。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索