Costa Ana Rosa, Correr Américo Bortolazzo, Puppin-Rontani Regina Maria, Vedovello Silvia Amélia Scudeler, Valdrighi Heloísa Cristina, Correr-Sobrinho Lourenço, Vedovello Filho Mário
Department of Restorative Dentistry, Dental Materials Division, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil.
Braz Dent J. 2011;22(6):486-9. doi: 10.1590/s0103-64402011000600008.
This study evaluated the effects of thermocycling and different light sources on the bond strength of metallic brackets to bovine tooth enamel using an adhesive resin. Bovine teeth were etched with 35% phosphoric acid gel for 20 s. After application of primer, metallic brackets were bonded to the buccal surface using Transbond XT, forming 8 groups (n = 20), depending on the light source used for photoactivation (AccuCure 3000 argon laser--20 s, Apollo 95E plasma arc--12 s, UltraLume 5 LED--40 s and XL2500 halogen light--40 s) and experimental conditions without (Groups 1 to 4) or with thermocycling (Groups 5 to 8). Shear bond testing was carried out after 24 h of distilled water storage (Groups 1 to 4) or storage and thermocycling in distilled water (groups 5 to 8; 1,500 cycles--5°/55 °C). Data were subjected to two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (α = 0.05). The Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI) was evaluated at ×8 magnification. No significant differences (p>0.05) in bond strength were found when the conditions without and with thermocycling were compared for any of the light sources. No significant differences (p>0.05) in bond strength were found among the light sources, irrespective of performing or not thermocycling. There was a predominance of ARI scores 1 in all groups. In conclusion, light sources and thermocycling had no influence on the bond strength of brackets to bovine enamel.
本研究使用一种粘结树脂评估了热循环和不同光源对金属托槽与牛牙釉质粘结强度的影响。用35%的磷酸凝胶对牛牙蚀刻20秒。涂抹底漆后,使用Transbond XT将金属托槽粘结到颊面,根据用于光固化的光源(AccuCure 3000氩激光——20秒、Apollo 95E等离子弧——12秒、UltraLume 5发光二极管——40秒和XL2500卤素灯——40秒)以及有无热循环的实验条件(第1至4组无热循环,第5至8组有热循环)分为8组(每组n = 20)。在蒸馏水中储存24小时后(第1至4组)或在蒸馏水中储存并进行热循环后(第5至8组;1500次循环——5℃/55℃)进行剪切粘结测试。数据进行双向方差分析和Tukey检验(α = 0.05)。在8倍放大倍数下评估粘结剂残留指数(ARI)。对于任何一种光源,比较有无热循环条件下的粘结强度时均未发现显著差异(p>0.05)。无论是否进行热循环,各光源之间的粘结强度均未发现显著差异(p>0.05)。所有组中ARI评分为1的情况占主导。总之,光源和热循环对托槽与牛牙釉质的粘结强度没有影响。