• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社区低危原发性上消化道出血的管理:一项为期 5 年的观察性研究。

The management of low-risk primary upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage in the community: a 5-year observational study.

机构信息

Peninsula College of Medicine and Dentistry, Universities of Exeter and Plymouth, Truro, Cornwall, UK.

出版信息

Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012 Mar;24(3):288-93. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0b013e32834febef.

DOI:10.1097/MEG.0b013e32834febef
PMID:22189690
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage is a common medical emergency, initially managed with inpatient care. Bleeding stops spontaneously in over 80% of cases, indicating that patients with low-risk upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage may be more optimally managed in the community, without the need for admission to hospital.

AIM

To assess the safety of managing patients with low-risk upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage without admission to hospital.

METHODS

Prospective/retrospective study of all patients presenting to a UK teaching hospital with low-risk upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage who were managed without admission to hospital over 5 years. Low risk was defined as Glasgow Blatchford Score of 2 or less, age below 70 years, no other active medical problems, not taking warfarin and suspected nonvariceal bleed. Outcome measures were the need for intervention (blood transfusion, endoscopic therapy or surgery) and death.

RESULTS

One hundred and forty-two patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria, and were managed without admission to hospital. No patients required endoscopic intervention, blood transfusion or surgery. The 28-day mortality was nil. Forty-one patients had normal endoscopic examination and 11 had significant endoscopic findings (peptic ulceration=10, oozing Mallory-Weiss tear=1) but did not require intervention.

CONCLUSION

Patients presenting with a primary upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage aged below 70 years with a Glasgow Blatchford Score of 2 or less are at a low risk, and can be safely managed in the community.

摘要

背景

急性上消化道出血是一种常见的医疗急症,最初采用住院治疗。超过 80%的病例出血会自行停止,这表明低危上消化道出血患者可能更适合在社区进行管理,而无需住院治疗。

目的

评估不将低危上消化道出血患者收入院管理的安全性。

方法

对在英国一所教学医院就诊的 5 年内所有低危上消化道出血且未入院治疗的患者进行前瞻性/回顾性研究。低危定义为格拉斯哥布莱德福德评分(Glasgow Blatchford Score)为 2 或更低、年龄低于 70 岁、无其他活跃的医疗问题、未服用华法林且疑似非静脉曲张性出血。主要观察指标为需要干预(输血、内镜治疗或手术)和死亡。

结果

符合纳入标准的患者共 142 例,未收入院治疗。无患者需要内镜介入、输血或手术。28 天死亡率为零。41 例患者内镜检查正常,11 例患者有明显的内镜发现(消化性溃疡=10 例,Mallory-Weiss 撕裂渗血=1 例),但无需干预。

结论

年龄小于 70 岁且格拉斯哥布莱德福德评分为 2 或更低的原发性上消化道出血患者风险较低,可以在社区内安全地进行管理。

相似文献

1
The management of low-risk primary upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage in the community: a 5-year observational study.社区低危原发性上消化道出血的管理:一项为期 5 年的观察性研究。
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012 Mar;24(3):288-93. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0b013e32834febef.
2
Risk scoring systems to predict need for clinical intervention for patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding.预测非静脉曲张性上消化道出血患者临床干预需求的风险评分系统。
Am J Emerg Med. 2007 Sep;25(7):774-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2006.12.024.
3
Management of minor upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage in the community using the Glasgow Blatchford Score.采用格拉斯哥·布拉奇福德评分法对社区中轻微上消化道出血进行管理。
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009 Dec;21(12):1340-6. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0b013e32831bc3ec.
4
Upper gastrointestinal bleeding: predictors of risk in a mixed patient group including variceal and nonvariceal haemorrhage.上消化道出血:包括静脉曲张性和非静脉曲张性出血在内的混合患者群体的风险预测因素。
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012 Feb;24(2):149-54. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0b013e32834e37d6.
5
Predictive validity of the Glasgow Blatchford Bleeding Score in an unselected emergency department population in continental Europe.在欧洲大陆的一个非选择性急诊人群中,格拉斯哥·布拉奇福德出血评分的预测有效性。
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012 Apr;24(4):382-7. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0b013e3283505965.
6
Acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage in patients aged 80 years or more.80岁及以上患者的急性上消化道出血
Q J Med. 1988 Oct;68(258):765-74.
7
Outpatient management of patients with low-risk upper-gastrointestinal haemorrhage: multicentre validation and prospective evaluation.低风险上消化道出血患者的门诊管理:多中心验证与前瞻性评估
Lancet. 2009 Jan 3;373(9657):42-7. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61769-9. Epub 2008 Dec 16.
8
The Blatchford score is an useful index in the management of Mallory-Weiss tear and gastrointestinal bleeding: experience from an urban community hospital.布莱奇福德评分是管理马洛里-魏斯撕裂伤和胃肠道出血的一项有用指标:来自一家城市社区医院的经验。
Acta Gastroenterol Belg. 2012 Dec;75(4):432-7.
9
Performance of the Glasgow-Blatchford score in predicting clinical outcomes and intervention in hospitalized patients with upper GI bleeding.格拉斯哥-布拉奇福德评分在上消化道出血住院患者中预测临床结局和干预的表现。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 Oct;78(4):576-83. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.05.003. Epub 2013 Jun 18.
10
[Management of upper digestive hemorrhage occurring in the community: patterns of patient care in 4 French administrative areas].[社区上消化道出血的管理:法国4个行政区的患者护理模式]
Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 2000 Nov;24(11):1003-11.

引用本文的文献

1
Pre-Endoscopic Scores Predicting Low-Risk Patients with Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.预测上消化道出血低风险患者的内镜前评分:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
J Clin Med. 2023 Aug 9;12(16):5194. doi: 10.3390/jcm12165194.
2
Comparison of risk scoring systems for patients presenting with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: international multicentre prospective study.上消化道出血患者风险评分系统的比较:国际多中心前瞻性研究
BMJ. 2017 Jan 4;356:i6432. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i6432.
3
Upper gastrointestinal bleeding risk scores: Who, when and why?
上消化道出血风险评分:对象、时机及原因?
World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol. 2016 Feb 15;7(1):86-96. doi: 10.4291/wjgp.v7.i1.86.
4
Use of glasgow-blatchford bleeding score reduces hospital stay duration and costs for patients with low-risk upper GI bleeding.使用格拉斯哥-布拉奇福德出血评分可缩短低风险上消化道出血患者的住院时间并降低费用。
Endosc Int Open. 2014 Jun;2(2):E74-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1365542. Epub 2014 May 7.
5
Does Preendoscopy Rockall Score Safely Identify Low Risk Patients following Upper Gastrointestinal Haemorrhage?内镜检查前Rockall评分能否安全识别上消化道出血后的低风险患者?
Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2015;2015:410702. doi: 10.1155/2015/410702. Epub 2015 May 18.