The Centre for Spinal Studies and Surgery, Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Derby Road, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK.
Eur Spine J. 2012 May;21(5):829-36. doi: 10.1007/s00586-011-2125-7. Epub 2011 Dec 23.
U-shaped sacral fractures usually result from axial loading of the spine with simultaneous sacral pivoting due to a horizontal fracture which leads to a highly unstable spino-pelvic dissociation. Due to the rarity of these fractures, there is lack of an agreed treatment strategy.
A thorough literature search was carried out to identify current treatment concepts. The studies were analysed for mechanism of injury, diagnostic imaging, associated injuries, type of surgery, follow-up times, complications, neurological, clinical and radiological outcome.
Sixty-three cases were found in 12 articles. No Class I, II or III evidence was found in the literature. The most common mechanism of injury was a fall or jump from height. Pre-operative neurological deficit was noted in 50 (94.3%) out of 53 cases (not available in 10 patients). The most used surgical options were spino-pelvic fixation with or without decompression and ilio-sacral screws. Post-operative complications occurred in 24 (38.1%) patients. Average follow-up time was 18.6 months (range 2-34 months). Full neurological recovery was noted in 20 cases, partial recovery in 14 and 9 patients had no neurological recovery (5 patients were lost in follow-up). Fracture healing was mentioned in 7 articles with only 1 case of fracture reduction loss.
From the current available data, an evidence based treatment strategy regarding outcome, neurological recovery or fracture healing could not be identified. Limited access and minimal-invasive surgery focussing on sacral reduction and restoration seems to offer comparable results to large spino-pelvic constructs with fewer complications and should be considered as the method of choice. If the fracture is highly unstable and displaced, spino-pelvic fixation might offer better stability.
U 形骶骨骨折通常是由于脊柱轴向负荷和骶骨同时旋转引起的,这是由于水平骨折导致高度不稳定的脊柱骨盆分离。由于这些骨折罕见,因此缺乏共识的治疗策略。
进行了全面的文献检索,以确定当前的治疗概念。对研究进行了分析,包括损伤机制、诊断影像学、相关损伤、手术类型、随访时间、并发症、神经功能、临床和影像学结果。
在 12 篇文章中发现了 63 例病例。文献中没有 I 类、II 类或 III 类证据。最常见的损伤机制是跌倒或高处跳下。53 例中有 50 例(94.3%)术前存在神经功能缺损(10 例不可用)。最常用的手术选择是脊柱骨盆固定术,伴有或不伴有减压和髂骶螺钉。24 例(38.1%)患者术后出现并发症。平均随访时间为 18.6 个月(2-34 个月)。20 例患者完全恢复神经功能,14 例部分恢复,9 例无神经恢复(5 例随访丢失)。7 篇文章中提到了骨折愈合情况,只有 1 例出现骨折复位丢失。
从目前可获得的数据来看,无法确定与结局、神经恢复或骨折愈合相关的基于证据的治疗策略。有限的入路和微创手术,重点是骶骨复位和重建,似乎可以提供与较大的脊柱骨盆结构相似的结果,并发症更少,应作为首选方法。如果骨折高度不稳定和移位,脊柱骨盆固定可能提供更好的稳定性。