Lee Jeong A, Jo Kwang Wook, Kong Doo-Sik, Park Kwan
Department of Neurosurgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2012;90(1):16-9. doi: 10.1159/000330396. Epub 2011 Dec 22.
To date, no consensus has been reached regarding validated and practical tools to quantify the severity of hemifacial spasm (HFS) before and after surgery.
The aim of this study has been to establish objective parameters for determining the preoperative severity of HFS and to assess the correlation with quality of life (QoL) in HFS patients.
Patients who experienced HFS between April and August 2010 were reviewed. The patients were divided into four groups according to the severity of spasm (SMC grade): grade I - localized spasm around the periocular area; grade II - involuntary movement spreads to other parts of the ipsilateral face and it affects other muscle groups, i.e. the orbicularis oris, zygomaticus, frontalis or platysma muscle; grade III - interference with vision because of frequent tonic spasms, and grade IV - disfiguring asymmetry. We interviewed each patient using an HFS-7 questionnaire containing a short self-rating QoL scale. We estimated the measure of agreement across observers and examined the relationships between SMC grade and other factors, including HFS-7 responses.
Preoperative evaluation using the SMC grading system showed 25 patients with grade I, 48 patients with grade II, 33 patients with grade III, and 12 patients with grade IV HFS. The HFS-7 scores indicating QoL were 9 (range: 0-17) in grade I, 12 (range: 1-25) in grade II, 16 (range: 2-23) in grade III, and 17 (range: 3-24) in grade IV subjects. SMC grade was correlated with symptom duration (p < 0.0001) and HFS-7 score (p = 0.02). In addition, higher SMC grade was closely associated with longer duration of persisting symptoms (p < 0.05).
An SMC grading system is useful as a means of quantifying spasms to allow for more precise descriptions of a patient's condition including QoL, and to improve the accuracy of communication between medical teams.
迄今为止,关于用于量化面肌痉挛(HFS)手术前后严重程度的有效且实用的工具,尚未达成共识。
本研究的目的是建立用于确定HFS术前严重程度的客观参数,并评估其与HFS患者生活质量(QoL)的相关性。
回顾了2010年4月至8月间经历HFS的患者。根据痉挛严重程度(痉挛分级量表[SMC]分级)将患者分为四组:I级——眼周区域局限性痉挛;II级——不自主运动扩散至同侧面部其他部位并影响其他肌肉群,即口轮匝肌、颧肌、额肌或颈阔肌;III级——因频繁强直性痉挛导致视力受影响;IV级——毁容性不对称。我们使用包含简短自评QoL量表的HFS-7问卷对每位患者进行访谈。我们估计了观察者之间的一致性度量,并检查了SMC分级与其他因素之间的关系,包括HFS-7问卷的回答。
使用SMC分级系统进行的术前评估显示,25例患者为I级HFS,48例为II级,33例为III级,12例为IV级。I级患者表明QoL的HFS-7评分为9分(范围:0 - 17),II级为12分(范围:1 - 25),III级为16分(范围:2 - 23),IV级受试者为17分(范围:3 - 24)。SMC分级与症状持续时间(p < 0.0001)和HFS-7评分(p = 0.02)相关。此外,较高的SMC分级与持续症状的持续时间较长密切相关(p < 0.05)。
SMC分级系统作为量化痉挛的一种手段很有用,能够更精确地描述患者病情,包括QoL,并提高医疗团队之间沟通的准确性。