Paediatric Infectious Diseases Clinic, Baylor-Uganda, Mulago Hospital, Kampala, Uganda.
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2012 Feb;91(2):272-80. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2011.225. Epub 2011 Dec 21.
The bioequivalence of formulations is usually evaluated in healthy adult volunteers. In our study in 19 HIV-1-infected Ugandan children (1.8-4 years of age, weight 12 to <15 kg) receiving zidovudine, lamivudine, and abacavir solutions twice a day for ≥24 weeks, the use of scored tablets allowed comparison of plasma pharmacokinetics of oral solutions vs. tablets. Samples were collected 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 12 h after each child's last morning dose of oral solution before changing to scored tablets of Combivir (coformulated zidovudine + lamivudine) and abacavir; this was repeated 4 weeks later. Dose-normalized area under curve (AUC)(0-12) and peak concentration (C(max)) for the tablet formulation were bioequivalent with those of the oral solution with respect to zidovudine and abacavir (e.g., dose-normalized geometric mean ratio (dnGMR) (tablet:solution) for zidovudine and abacavir AUC(0-12) were 1.01 (90% confidence interval (CI) 0.87-1.18) and 0.96 (0.83-1.12), respectively). However, lamivudine exposure was ~55% higher with the tablet formulation (AUC(0-12) dnGMR = 1.58 (1.37-1.81), C(max) dnGMR = 1.55 (1.33-1.81)). Although the clinical relevance of this finding is unclear, it highlights the impact of the formulation and the importance of conducting bioequivalence studies in target pediatric populations.
在健康的成年志愿者中通常评估制剂的生物等效性。在我们对 19 名感染 HIV-1 的乌干达儿童(1.8-4 岁,体重 12 至 <15 公斤)进行的研究中,这些儿童在接受齐多夫定、拉米夫定和阿巴卡韦溶液每日两次治疗至少 24 周后,使用刻痕片允许比较口服溶液与片剂的血浆药代动力学。在改用 Combivir(齐多夫定+拉米夫定联合制剂)和阿巴卡韦的刻痕片前,每个儿童最后一次早晨服用口服溶液后 0、1、2、4、6、8 和 12 小时采集样本;4 周后重复该过程。相对于齐多夫定和阿巴卡韦,片剂制剂的剂量标准化 AUC(0-12)和峰浓度(C(max))与口服溶液生物等效(例如,齐多夫定和阿巴卡韦 AUC(0-12)的剂量标准化几何均数比(dnGMR)(片剂:溶液)分别为 1.01(90%置信区间(CI)为 0.87-1.18)和 0.96(0.83-1.12))。然而,片剂制剂的拉米夫定暴露量约高 55%(AUC(0-12)dnGMR=1.58(1.37-1.81),C(max)dnGMR=1.55(1.33-1.81))。虽然这一发现的临床意义尚不清楚,但它强调了制剂的影响以及在目标儿科人群中进行生物等效性研究的重要性。