• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性冠状动脉综合征血流动力学稳定患者的即刻多血管经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:EHS-PCI 注册研究中超过 4400 例患者的分析。

Prima-vista multi-vessel percutaneous coronary intervention in haemodynamically stable patients with acute coronary syndromes: analysis of over 4.400 patients in the EHS-PCI registry.

机构信息

Herzzentrum Ludwigshafen, Institut für Herzinfarktforschung Ludwigshafen an der Universität Heidelberg, Germany.

出版信息

Int J Cardiol. 2013 Jul 1;166(3):596-600. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2011.11.024. Epub 2011 Dec 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijcard.2011.11.024
PMID:22192297
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The role of adhoc multi-vessel percutaneous coronary intervention (MV-PCI) in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non ST elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS) has not fully defined yet. Therefore, we sought to evaluate the impact of MV-PCI on in-hospital outcome of patients with MV disease presenting with ACS.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We evaluated 4, 457 haemodynamically stable patients with ACS and at least two major epicardial vessels with ≥70% stenosis of the contemporary Euro Heart Survey PCI registry. They were stratified into four categories: 419 STEMI and 734 NSTE-ACS patients undergoing MV-PCI and 2,118 STEMI and 1,186 NSTE-ACS patients undergoing culprit lesion (CL)-PCI only, respectively. In comparison to patients with CL-PCI hospital mortality was numerically lower among those undergoing MV-PCI for STEMI (1.4 versus 3.4%, P=0.03) and for NSTE-ACS (1.1 versus 2.1%, P=0.10). After adjustment for confounding variables no significant mortality difference was observed among patients treated with MV-PCI for STEMI (OR 0.48, 95%-CI 0.21-1.13) and for NSTE-ACS (OR 0.54, 95%-CI 0.24-1.22). However, the risk for non-fatal postprocedural myocardial infarction was markedly increased among patients undergoing MV-PCI for STEMI (8.8 versus 1.6%, P<0.0001) and for NSTE-ACS (5.3 versus 1.8%, P<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

In clinical practice MV-PCI in haemodynamically stable with ACS is used only in a minority of patients. There was no significant difference in hospital mortality between patients treated with MV- and CL-PCI, but MV-PCI was associated with a higher rate of postprocedural myocardial infarction.

摘要

背景

在 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)和非 ST 段抬高型急性冠脉综合征(NSTE-ACS)患者中,临时多血管经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(MV-PCI)的作用尚未完全明确。因此,我们试图评估 MV-PCI 对伴有 ACS 的 MV 疾病患者住院期间结局的影响。

方法和结果

我们评估了当代 Euro Heart Survey PCI 注册研究中 4457 例血流动力学稳定的 ACS 患者和至少两支存在 ≥70%狭窄的主要心外膜血管。他们分为四组:419 例 STEMI 和 734 例 NSTE-ACS 患者行 MV-PCI,2118 例 STEMI 和 1186 例 NSTE-ACS 患者仅行罪犯病变(CL)-PCI。与 CL-PCI 相比,STEMI 患者行 MV-PCI 的住院死亡率较低(1.4%比 3.4%,P=0.03),NSTE-ACS 患者行 MV-PCI 的住院死亡率也较低(1.1%比 2.1%,P=0.10)。调整混杂因素后,STEMI 患者行 MV-PCI(OR 0.48,95%-CI 0.21-1.13)和 NSTE-ACS 患者行 MV-PCI(OR 0.54,95%-CI 0.24-1.22)的死亡率无显著差异。然而,STEMI 患者行 MV-PCI 后非致命性心肌梗死的风险明显增加(8.8%比 1.6%,P<0.0001),NSTE-ACS 患者行 MV-PCI 后非致命性心肌梗死的风险也明显增加(5.3%比 1.8%,P<0.0001)。

结论

在临床实践中,MV-PCI 仅在少数血流动力学稳定的 ACS 患者中使用。MV-PCI 和 CL-PCI 治疗的患者住院死亡率无显著差异,但 MV-PCI 与术后心肌梗死发生率较高相关。

相似文献

1
Prima-vista multi-vessel percutaneous coronary intervention in haemodynamically stable patients with acute coronary syndromes: analysis of over 4.400 patients in the EHS-PCI registry.急性冠状动脉综合征血流动力学稳定患者的即刻多血管经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:EHS-PCI 注册研究中超过 4400 例患者的分析。
Int J Cardiol. 2013 Jul 1;166(3):596-600. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2011.11.024. Epub 2011 Dec 20.
2
Culprit-only or multivessel revascularization in patients with acute coronary syndromes: an American College of Cardiology National Cardiovascular Database Registry report.急性冠状动脉综合征患者单纯罪犯血管血运重建与多支血管血运重建:美国心脏病学会国家心血管数据库注册研究报告
Am Heart J. 2008 Jan;155(1):140-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2007.09.007.
3
Comparison of long-term outcomes in STEMI and NSTE-ACS after coronary stent placement: an analysis in a real world BMS and DES population.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后 STEMI 和 NSTE-ACS 患者长期结局的比较:真实世界 BMS 和 DES 人群分析。
Int J Cardiol. 2013 Sep 1;167(5):2082-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.05.064. Epub 2012 Jun 2.
4
Impact of nonculprit vessel myocardial perfusion on outcomes of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndromes: analysis from the ACUITY trial (Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage Strategy).非罪犯血管心肌灌注对急性冠状动脉综合征经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者结局的影响:来自 ACUITY 试验(急性血管造影和紧急介入治疗策略)的分析。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Mar;7(3):266-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.08.016.
5
Left circumflex artery-related myocardial infarction: does ST elevation matter? Results from the Euro Heart Survey PCI registry.左旋支动脉相关心肌梗死:ST 段抬高是否重要?来自 Euro Heart Survey PCI 注册研究的结果。
Int J Cardiol. 2013 Oct 15;168(6):5239-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.08.024. Epub 2013 Aug 14.
6
Prognostic impact of multivessel versus culprit vessel only percutaneous intervention for patients with multivessel coronary artery disease presenting with acute coronary syndrome.多支血管病变与仅罪犯血管经皮介入治疗对急性冠状动脉综合征合并多支冠状动脉疾病患者的预后影响
EuroIntervention. 2015 Jul;11(3):293-300. doi: 10.4244/EIJY14M08_05.
7
Use and outcomes of multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (from the EHS-PCI Registry).急性心肌梗死后并发心源性休克患者的多支血管经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的应用及结局(来自 EHS-PCI 注册研究)。
Am J Cardiol. 2012 Apr 1;109(7):941-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.11.020. Epub 2012 Jan 9.
8
Ischemic outcomes after coronary intervention of calcified vessels in acute coronary syndromes. Pooled analysis from the HORIZONS-AMI (Harmonizing Outcomes With Revascularization and Stents in Acute Myocardial Infarction) and ACUITY (Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage Strategy) TRIALS.急性冠状动脉综合征中钙化病变血管经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的缺血结局。HORIZONS-AMI(急性心肌梗死中血管重建和支架与优化药物治疗的比较)和 ACUITY(急性冠状动脉介入治疗即刻危险分层及早期介入策略)试验的汇总分析。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 May 13;63(18):1845-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.01.034. Epub 2014 Feb 19.
9
Percutaneous coronary intervention in women: in-hospital clinical outcome: experience from a single private institution in Melbourne.女性经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:住院临床结局:来自墨尔本一家私立机构的经验
Heart Lung Circ. 2008;17 Suppl 4:S55-62. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2008.08.002. Epub 2008 Oct 15.
10
Impact of renal failure on all-cause mortality and other outcomes in patients treated by percutaneous coronary intervention.肾衰竭对接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者全因死亡率及其他预后的影响。
Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2015 Nov;108(11):554-62. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2015.06.001. Epub 2015 Jul 13.

引用本文的文献

1
A riddle of culprit only vs multivessel or immediate vs staged revascularization in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome: A meta-analysis.非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者中仅罪犯血管与多支血管病变或即刻与分期血运重建之谜:一项荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2025 Mar 18;20(3):e0310695. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310695. eCollection 2025.
2
Target Vessel Versus Complete Revascularization in Non-ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction Without Cardiogenic Shock.非ST段抬高型心肌梗死且无心源性休克患者的靶血管血运重建与完全血运重建对比
Cureus. 2022 Mar 14;14(3):e23139. doi: 10.7759/cureus.23139. eCollection 2022 Mar.
3
Management of multivessel coronary artery disease in patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a complex path to precision medicine.
非ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者多支冠状动脉疾病的管理:通往精准医学的复杂路径。
Ther Adv Chronic Dis. 2020 Jul 1;11:2040622320938527. doi: 10.1177/2040622320938527. eCollection 2020.
4
Revascularization strategies for patients with myocardial infarction and multi-vessel disease: A critical appraisal of the current evidence.心肌梗死合并多支血管病变患者的血运重建策略:对当前证据的批判性评估
J Geriatr Cardiol. 2019 Sep;16(9):717-723. doi: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2019.09.001.
5
Effects of complete revascularization on long-term treatment outcomes in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease over 80 years of age admitted for acute coronary syndrome.完全血运重建对80岁以上因急性冠脉综合征入院的多支冠状动脉疾病患者长期治疗结局的影响。
Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2019 Aug;9(4):301-309. doi: 10.21037/cdt.2018.12.04.
6
Comparison of 30-Day MACE between Immediate versus Staged Complete Revascularization in Acute Myocardial Infarction with Multivessel Disease, and the Effect of Coronary Lesion Complexity.急性心肌梗死合并多支血管病变时即刻完全血运重建与分期完全血运重建的30天主要不良心血管事件比较及冠状动脉病变复杂性的影响
Medicina (Kaunas). 2019 Feb 15;55(2):51. doi: 10.3390/medicina55020051.
7
Early and long-term outcomes of complete revascularization with percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease presenting with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes.多支冠状动脉疾病合并非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗实现完全血运重建的早期和长期结果
Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej. 2018;14(1):32-41. doi: 10.5114/aic.2018.74353. Epub 2018 Mar 22.
8
Complete Versus Culprit-Only Revascularization in STEMI: a Contemporary Review.ST段抬高型心肌梗死中的完全血运重建与仅罪犯血管血运重建:当代综述
Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2018 Apr 7;20(5):41. doi: 10.1007/s11936-018-0636-9.
9
In-Hospital and One-Year Clinical Outcome of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in a Tertiary Hospital in Oman: Oman PCI Registry.阿曼一家三级医院经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的院内及一年临床结局:阿曼经皮冠状动脉介入治疗注册研究
Oman Med J. 2017 Jan;32(1):54-61. doi: 10.5001/omj.2017.10.
10
Interventional therapies in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克的介入治疗
Herz. 2017 Feb;42(1):11-17. doi: 10.1007/s00059-016-4511-8.