• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性心肌梗死后并发心源性休克患者的多支血管经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的应用及结局(来自 EHS-PCI 注册研究)。

Use and outcomes of multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (from the EHS-PCI Registry).

机构信息

Herzzentrum Ludwigshafen, Institut für Herzinfarktforschung Ludwigshafen an der Universität Heidelberg, Germany.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 2012 Apr 1;109(7):941-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.11.020. Epub 2012 Jan 9.

DOI:10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.11.020
PMID:22236463
Abstract

The value of multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention (MV-PCI) in patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) and multivessel disease (MVD) is still unclear because randomized controlled trials are missing. Therefore, we sought to evaluate the impact of MV-PCI on in-hospital outcomes of patients with MVD presenting with CS: 336 patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by CS and ≥70% stenoses in ≥2 major epicardial vessels were included in this analysis of the Euro Heart Survey PCI registry. Patients undergoing MV-PCI (n = 82, 24%) were compared to those with single-vessel PCI (n = 254, 76%). The rate of 3-vessel disease (60% vs 57%, p = 0.63) was similar in the 2 cohorts. Presentation with resuscitation (48 vs 46%, p = 0.76) and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (83 vs 87%, p = 0.31) was frequent in patients with MV-PCI and single-vessel PCI. Patients with ventilation were more likely to receive MV-PCI (30% vs 19%, p = 0.05). There was a tendency toward a higher hospital mortality in patients with MV-PCI (48.8% vs 37.4%, p = 0.07). After adjustment for confounding variables, no significant difference for in-hospital mortality (odd ratio [OR] 1.28, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.72 to 2.28) could be observed between the 2 groups. Age (OR 1.41, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.77), 3-vessel disease (OR 1.78, 95% CI 1.04 to 3.03), ventilation (OR 3.01, 95% CI 1.59 to 5.68), and previous resuscitation (OR 2.55, 95% CI 1.48 to 4.39) were independent predictors of hospital death. In conclusion, MV-PCI is currently used in only 1/4 of patients with CS and MVD. An additional nonculprit PCI was not associated with a survival benefit in these high risk patients.

摘要

多支血管经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(MV-PCI)在伴有心源性休克(CS)和多支血管疾病(MVD)的患者中的价值尚不清楚,因为缺乏随机对照试验。因此,我们试图评估 MV-PCI 对伴有 CS 的 MVD 患者住院期间结局的影响:这项来自欧洲心脏调查 PCI 注册研究的分析纳入了 336 例急性心肌梗死合并 CS 且≥2 个主要心外膜血管≥70%狭窄的患者。将接受 MV-PCI(n=82,24%)的患者与接受单支血管 PCI(n=254,76%)的患者进行比较。两组 3 支血管疾病的发生率(60% vs 57%,p=0.63)相似。MV-PCI 组和单支血管 PCI 组患者中,复苏后就诊(48% vs 46%,p=0.76)和 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(83% vs 87%,p=0.31)均很常见。接受通气的患者更有可能接受 MV-PCI(30% vs 19%,p=0.05)。MV-PCI 组患者的住院死亡率有升高趋势(48.8% vs 37.4%,p=0.07)。在调整混杂变量后,两组间住院死亡率无显著差异(比值比[OR]1.28,95%置信区间[CI]0.72 至 2.28)。年龄(OR 1.41,95%CI 1.13 至 1.77)、3 支血管疾病(OR 1.78,95%CI 1.04 至 3.03)、通气(OR 3.01,95%CI 1.59 至 5.68)和既往复苏(OR 2.55,95%CI 1.48 至 4.39)是住院死亡的独立预测因素。总之,MV-PCI 在伴有 CS 和 MVD 的患者中仅使用于 1/4 的患者。在这些高危患者中,非罪犯血管 PCI 并不能带来生存获益。

相似文献

1
Use and outcomes of multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (from the EHS-PCI Registry).急性心肌梗死后并发心源性休克患者的多支血管经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的应用及结局(来自 EHS-PCI 注册研究)。
Am J Cardiol. 2012 Apr 1;109(7):941-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.11.020. Epub 2012 Jan 9.
2
Primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction, resuscitated cardiac arrest, and cardiogenic shock: the role of primary multivessel revascularization.急性心肌梗死、心搏骤停复苏后和心原性休克患者的直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:多血管血运重建的作用。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Feb;6(2):115-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2012.10.006. Epub 2013 Jan 23.
3
Culprit-only or multivessel revascularization in patients with acute coronary syndromes: an American College of Cardiology National Cardiovascular Database Registry report.急性冠状动脉综合征患者单纯罪犯血管血运重建与多支血管血运重建:美国心脏病学会国家心血管数据库注册研究报告
Am Heart J. 2008 Jan;155(1):140-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2007.09.007.
4
Prognostic impact of staged versus "one-time" multivessel percutaneous intervention in acute myocardial infarction: analysis from the HORIZONS-AMI (harmonizing outcomes with revascularization and stents in acute myocardial infarction) trial.分期与“一次性”多血管经皮介入治疗急性心肌梗死的预后影响:来自 HORIZONS-AMI(急性心肌梗死中血管重建和支架与结局的协调)试验的分析。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Aug 9;58(7):704-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.02.071.
5
Primary percutaneous coronary intervention for unprotected left main disease in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction the AMIS (Acute Myocardial Infarction in Switzerland) plus registry experience.急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者无保护左主干病变的直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:瑞士急性心肌梗死注册研究(AMIS)的经验。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Jun;4(6):627-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2011.04.004.
6
Impact of multivessel coronary artery disease and noninfarct-related artery revascularization on outcome of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction transferred for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (from the EUROTRANSFER Registry).多支冠状动脉疾病及非梗死相关动脉血运重建对接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者预后的影响(来自欧洲转运注册研究)
Am J Cardiol. 2010 Aug 1;106(3):342-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.03.029. Epub 2010 Jun 18.
7
Prevalence, predictors, and in-hospital outcomes of non-infarct artery intervention during primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry).ST段抬高型心肌梗死直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗期间非梗死动脉介入治疗的患病率、预测因素及院内结局(来自国家心血管数据注册库)
Am J Cardiol. 2009 Aug 15;104(4):507-13. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.04.016. Epub 2009 Jun 18.
8
Use and impact of intra-aortic balloon pump on mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: results of the Euro Heart Survey on PCI.主动脉内球囊反搏在并发心原性休克的急性心肌梗死患者死亡率中的应用和影响:经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的 Euro Heart Survey 结果。
EuroIntervention. 2011 Aug;7(4):437-41. doi: 10.4244/EIJV7I4A72.
9
Mortality after emergent percutaneous coronary intervention in cardiogenic shock secondary to acute myocardial infarction and usefulness of a mortality prediction model.急性心肌梗死继发心源性休克患者急诊经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的死亡率及死亡率预测模型的效用
Am J Cardiol. 2005 Jul 1;96(1):35-41. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.02.040.
10
Impact of multivessel coronary disease on one-year clinical outcomes and five-year mortality in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.多支冠状动脉病变对行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者一年临床结局和五年死亡率的影响。
Kardiol Pol. 2011;69(4):336-43.

引用本文的文献

1
Extracorporeal Life Support for Cardiac Arrest and Cardiogenic Shock.心脏骤停和心源性休克的体外生命支持
US Cardiol. 2021 Nov 10;15:e23. doi: 10.15420/usc.2021.13. eCollection 2021.
2
Cardiac Failure and Cardiogenic Shock: Insights Into Pathophysiology, Classification, and Hemodynamic Assessment.心力衰竭与心源性休克:对病理生理学、分类及血流动力学评估的见解
Cureus. 2024 Oct 22;16(10):e72106. doi: 10.7759/cureus.72106. eCollection 2024 Oct.
3
Investigation of outcomes following transcatheter edge to edge repair of the mitral valve versus medical management alone in patients with cardiogenic shock and mitral regurgitation.
在心源性休克和二尖瓣反流患者中,经导管二尖瓣缘对缘修复与单纯药物治疗后的结局研究。
Am Heart J Plus. 2024 Jul 29;45:100430. doi: 10.1016/j.ahjo.2024.100430. eCollection 2024 Sep.
4
Management of cardiogenic shock: a narrative review.心源性休克的管理:一篇叙述性综述。
Ann Intensive Care. 2024 Mar 30;14(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s13613-024-01260-y.
5
Renal Impact of Culprit-Only versus Multi-Vessel Revascularization for Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.仅针对罪犯血管与多支血管血运重建治疗急性心肌梗死并发心源性休克的肾脏影响:系统评价与荟萃分析
Acta Cardiol Sin. 2023 Nov;39(6):817-830. doi: 10.6515/ACS.202311_39(6).20230307A.
6
Culprit-Only Versus Immediate Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicating Advanced Cardiogenic Shock Requiring Venoarterial-Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.急性心肌梗合并需要静脉动脉体外膜肺氧合的晚期心源性休克患者中,罪犯血管血运重建与即刻多血管经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的比较。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2023 May 16;12(10):e029792. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.029792. Epub 2023 May 9.
7
Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction With High Thrombus Burden and Cardiogenic Shock.ST段抬高型心肌梗死伴高血栓负荷和心源性休克患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗期间的主动脉内球囊反搏
Cureus. 2023 Jan 25;15(1):e34188. doi: 10.7759/cureus.34188. eCollection 2023 Jan.
8
Cardiovascular vs. non-cardiovascular deaths after heart failure hospitalization in young, older, and very old patients.心力衰竭住院的年轻、老年和非常老年患者的心血管与非心血管死亡。
ESC Heart Fail. 2023 Feb;10(1):673-684. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.14245. Epub 2022 Nov 27.
9
Long-term clinical outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock according to the application and initiation time of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in South Korea.根据韩国体外膜肺氧合应用和启动时间,急性心肌梗死合并心原性休克患者的长期临床结局。
Cardiol J. 2023;30(5):713-724. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2022.0101. Epub 2022 Nov 7.
10
Multivessel vs. Culprit Vessel-Only Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.多支血管与仅罪犯血管行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗心源性休克合并ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的疗效比较:一项更新的系统评价与荟萃分析
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Apr 15;9:735636. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.735636. eCollection 2022.