School of Psychological Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Implement Sci. 2011 Dec 22;6:132. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-132.
The evidence base for a range of psychosocial and behavioural interventions in managing and supporting patients with long-term conditions (LTCs) is now well-established. With increasing numbers of such patients being managed in primary care, and a shortage of specialists in psychology and behavioural management to deliver interventions, therapeutic interventions are increasingly being delivered by general nurses with limited training in psychological interventions. It is unknown what issues this raises for the nurses or their patients. The purpose of the study was to examine the challenges faced by non-specialist nurses when delivering psychological interventions for an LTC (chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis [CFS/ME]) within a primary care setting.
A qualitative study nested within a randomised controlled trial [ISRCTN 74156610] explored the experiences and acceptability of two different psychological interventions (pragmatic rehabilitation and supportive listening) from the perspectives of nurses, their supervisors, and patients. Semi structured in-depth interviews were conducted with three nurse therapists, three supervisors, and 46 patients. An iterative approach was used to develop conceptual categories from the dataset.
Analyses identified four sets of challenges that were common to both interventions: (i) being a novice therapist, (ii) engaging patients in the therapeutic model, (iii) dealing with emotions, and (iv) the complexity of primary care. Each challenge had the potential to cause tension between therapist and patient. A number of strategies were developed by participants to manage the tensions.
Tensions existed for nurses when attempting to deliver psychological interventions for patients with CFS/ME in this primary care trial. Such tensions should be addressed before implementing psychological interventions within routine clinical practice. Similar tensions may be found for other LTCs. Our findings have implications for developing therapeutic alliances and highlight the need for regular supervision.
针对管理和支持患有长期疾病(LTC)患者的一系列心理社会和行为干预措施,现已有充分的证据支持。随着越来越多的此类患者在初级保健中接受管理,而心理学和行为管理方面的专家却短缺,无法提供干预措施,因此治疗干预措施越来越多地由接受过有限心理干预培训的普通护士提供。目前尚不清楚这对护士或他们的患者会带来哪些问题。本研究的目的是调查非专业护士在初级保健环境中为 LTC(慢性疲劳综合征/肌痛性脑脊髓炎[CFS/ME])患者提供心理干预时所面临的挑战。
一项嵌套在随机对照试验中的定性研究[ISRCTN 74156610],从护士、他们的主管和患者的角度探讨了两种不同的心理干预措施(实用康复和支持性倾听)的经验和可接受性。对 3 名护士治疗师、3 名主管和 46 名患者进行了半结构化深入访谈。采用迭代方法从数据集开发概念类别。
分析确定了两种干预措施共有的四组挑战:(i)作为新手治疗师,(ii)使患者参与治疗模式,(iii)应对情绪,以及(iv)初级保健的复杂性。每个挑战都有可能在治疗师和患者之间造成紧张关系。参与者制定了许多策略来管理紧张局势。
在这项初级保健试验中,护士试图为 CFS/ME 患者提供心理干预时存在紧张局势。在常规临床实践中实施心理干预之前,应解决这些紧张局势。其他 LTC 也可能存在类似的紧张局势。我们的研究结果对发展治疗联盟具有重要意义,并强调了定期监督的必要性。