Healthcare Sciences and e-Health, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Mood Disorders Centre, Department of Psychology, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
BMC Psychiatry. 2023 Mar 29;23(1):208. doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-04547-9.
Depression during the perinatal period (during pregnancy and the year after childbirth) is common and associated with a range of negative effects for mothers, infants, family members, and wider society. Although existing evidence suggests cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) based interventions are effective for perinatal depression, less is known about the effect of CBT-based interventions on important secondary outcomes, and a number of potential clinical and methodological moderators have not been examined.
A systematic review and meta-analysis primarily examined the effectiveness of CBT-based interventions for perinatal depression on symptoms of depression. Secondary aims examined the effectiveness of CBT-based interventions for perinatal depression on symptoms of anxiety, stress, parenting, perceived social support, and perceived parental competence; and explored clinical and methodological moderators potentially associated with effectiveness. A systematic search of electronic databases and other sources was performed up to November 2021. We included randomized controlled trials comparing CBT-based interventions for perinatal depression with control conditions allowing for the isolation of the effects of CBT.
In total, 31 studies (5291 participants) were included in the systematic review and 26 studies (4658 participants) were included in the meta-analysis. The overall effect size was medium (hedges g = - 0.53 [95% CI - 0.65 to - 0.40]); with high heterogeneity. Significant effects were also found for anxiety, individual stress, and perceived social support, however few studies examined secondary outcomes. Subgroup analysis identified type of control, type of CBT, and type of health professional as significant moderators of the main effect (symptoms of depression). Some concerns of risk of bias were present in the majority of studies and one study had a high risk of bias.
CBT-based interventions for depression during the perinatal period appear effective, however results should be interpreted with caution given high levels of heterogeneity and low quality of included studies. There is a need to further investigate possibly important clinical moderators of effect, including the type of health professional delivering interventions. Further, results indicate a need to establish a minimum core data set to improve the consistency of secondary outcome collection across trials and to design and conduct trials with longer-term follow-up periods.
CRD42020152254 .
围产期(怀孕和产后一年)期间的抑郁较为常见,会对母亲、婴儿、家庭成员和更广泛的社会产生一系列负面影响。尽管现有证据表明,基于认知行为疗法(CBT)的干预措施对围产期抑郁有效,但对于 CBT 为基础的干预措施对重要的次要结果的影响了解较少,并且尚未检查一些潜在的临床和方法学调节因素。
系统回顾和荟萃分析主要考察了基于 CBT 的干预措施对围产期抑郁症状的有效性。次要目标是评估基于 CBT 的干预措施对围产期抑郁的焦虑、压力、育儿、感知社会支持和感知父母能力的有效性;并探索可能与有效性相关的临床和方法学调节因素。截至 2021 年 11 月,我们对电子数据库和其他来源进行了系统检索。我们纳入了比较基于 CBT 的围产期抑郁症干预与允许分离 CBT 效果的对照组的随机对照试验。
共有 31 项研究(5291 名参与者)被纳入系统综述,26 项研究(4658 名参与者)被纳入荟萃分析。总体效应量为中等(hedges g=-0.53 [95%CI -0.65 至 -0.40]);存在高度异质性。对于焦虑、个体压力和感知社会支持也发现了显著效果,但很少有研究检查次要结果。亚组分析确定了控制类型、CBT 类型和卫生专业人员类型是主要效果(抑郁症状)的重要调节因素。大多数研究存在偏倚风险的一些问题,一项研究存在高偏倚风险。
围产期抑郁症的基于 CBT 的干预措施似乎有效,但是由于高度异质性和纳入研究的低质量,结果应谨慎解释。需要进一步研究可能对效果有重要影响的临床调节因素,包括实施干预的卫生专业人员的类型。此外,结果表明需要建立一个最小核心数据集,以提高试验中次要结果收集的一致性,并设计和进行具有更长随访期的试验。
CRD42020152254 。