Suppr超能文献

超声心动图评估右心室容量:不同技术在法洛四联症根治术后儿童中的比较。

Echocardiographic assessment of right ventricular volumes: a comparison of different techniques in children after surgical repair of tetralogy of Fallot.

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Labatt Family Heart Centre, Department of Pediatrics, Hospital for Sick Children, 555, University Avenue, Toronto, Canada M5G 1X8.

出版信息

Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012 Jul;13(7):596-604. doi: 10.1093/ejechocard/jer278. Epub 2011 Dec 22.

Abstract

AIMS

Different echocardiographic techniques are available for assessing right ventricular (RV) volumes but their clinical validity has not been well established. We compared the feasibility, reproducibility and accuracy of three different echocardiographic techniques for measuring RV volumes and ejection fraction (EF) in children after tetralogy of Fallot (TOF) repair.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Seventy patients (age 14.2 ± 7.3 years) were studied using three-dimensional (3D) volume acquisition analysis (Tomtec, Germany), 2D echo with knowledge-based 3D reconstruction (3DR) (Ventripoint, USA) and the four-chamber area (4C area) methods. Parameters analysed were RV end-diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic volume and EF. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data were available in 41 patients. Intra- and inter-observer as well as inter-technique variability was assessed using Pearson's correlation analysis (R), coefficient of variance, and Bland-Altman analysis. Feasibility was good for all echo techniques (91% for the 3D, 98% for the 3DR, and 100% for the 4C area method). Intra- and inter-observer variability was low for both 3DR and the 3D echo, while more variability was observed for the 4C method. Compared with MRI volumes, 3DR and 3D underestimated EDV by 6.6 ± 10 and 18.2 ± 17.8 mL, respectively, (P < 0.001), while the 4C area method overestimated the EDV by 9.6 ± 33 mL, not significant due to a wide range.

CONCLUSION

Current echocardiographic techniques to assess RV volumes are highly feasible and reproducible in paediatric post-operative TOF patients. When compared with MRI measurements, 3DR was the most accurate technique but requires extra equipment that is not readily available.

摘要

目的

有多种超声心动图技术可用于评估右心室(RV)容积,但它们的临床有效性尚未得到充分证实。我们比较了三种不同的超声心动图技术测量法洛四联症(TOF)修复后儿童 RV 容积和射血分数(EF)的可行性、可重复性和准确性。

方法和结果

70 例患者(年龄 14.2±7.3 岁)分别使用三维(3D)容积采集分析(德国 Tomtec)、基于知识的 3D 重建二维超声心动图(3DR)(美国 Ventripoint)和四腔面积(4C 面积)方法进行研究。分析的参数包括 RV 舒张末期容积(EDV)、收缩末期容积和 EF。41 例患者有磁共振成像(MRI)数据。采用 Pearson 相关分析(R)、变异系数和 Bland-Altman 分析评估观察者内、观察者间和技术间的可变性。所有超声心动图技术的可行性均良好(3D 为 91%,3DR 为 98%,4C 面积法为 100%)。3DR 和 3D 心动图的观察者内和观察者间变异性较低,而 4C 方法的变异性较大。与 MRI 容积相比,3DR 和 3D 分别低估了 EDV 6.6±10 和 18.2±17.8 mL(P<0.001),而 4C 面积法高估了 EDV 9.6±33 mL,但由于范围较宽,差异无统计学意义。

结论

目前用于评估 RV 容积的超声心动图技术在小儿术后 TOF 患者中具有高度的可行性和可重复性。与 MRI 测量相比,3DR 是最准确的技术,但需要额外的设备,这些设备不易获得。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验