Suppr超能文献

床旁对下腔静脉进行简单的超声测量与中心静脉压相关吗?

Does a simple bedside sonographic measurement of the inferior vena cava correlate to central venous pressure?

作者信息

De Lorenzo Robert A, Morris Michael J, Williams Justin B, Haley Timothy F, Straight Timothy M, Holbrook-Emmons Victoria L, Medina Juanita S

机构信息

Department of Clinical Investigation, Brooke Army Medical Center, Fort Sam Houston, TX 78234-6200, USA.

出版信息

J Emerg Med. 2012 Apr;42(4):429-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2011.05.082. Epub 2011 Dec 22.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Bedside ultrasound has been suggested as a non-invasive modality to estimate central venous pressure (CVP).

OBJECTIVE

Evaluate a simple bedside ultrasound technique to measure the diameter of the inferior vena cava (IVC) and correlate to simultaneously measured CVP. Secondary comparisons include anatomic location, probe orientation, and phase of respiration.

METHODS

An unblinded prospective observation study was performed in an emergency department and critical care unit. Subjects were a convenience sample of adult patients with a central line at the superior venocaval-atrial junction. Ultrasound measured transverse and longitudinal diameters of the IVC at the subxiphoid, suprailiac, and mid-abdomen, each measured at end-inspiration and end-expiration. Correlation and regression analysis were used to relate CVP and IVC diameters.

RESULTS

There were 72 subjects with a mean age of 67 years (range 21-94 years), 37 (53%) male, enrolled over 9 months. Seven subjects were excluded for tricuspid valvulopathy. Primary diagnoses were: respiratory failure 12 (18%), sepsis 11 (17%), and pancreatitis 3 (5%). There were 28 (43%) patients mechanically ventilated. Adequate measurements were obtainable in 57 (89%) using the subxiphoid, in 44 (68%) using the mid-abdomen, and in 28 (43%) using the suprailiac views. The correlation coefficients were statistically significant at 0.49 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.26-0.66), 0.51 (95% CI 0.23-0.71), and 0.50 (95% CI 0.14-0.74) for end-inspiratory longitudinal subxiphoid, midpoint, and suprailiac views, respectively. Transverse values were statistically significant at 0.42 (95% CI 0.18-0.61), 0.38 (95% CI 0.09-0.61), and 0.67 (95% CI 0.40-0.84), respectively. End-expiratory measurements gave similar or slightly less significant values.

CONCLUSION

The subxiphoid was the most reliably viewed of the three anatomic locations; however, the suprailiac view produced superior correlations to the CVP. Longitudinal views generally outperformed transverse views. A simple ultrasound measure of the IVC yields weak correlation to the CVP.

摘要

背景

床旁超声已被提议作为一种估计中心静脉压(CVP)的非侵入性方法。

目的

评估一种简单的床旁超声技术,以测量下腔静脉(IVC)直径,并与同时测量的CVP进行关联。次要比较包括解剖位置、探头方向和呼吸相位。

方法

在急诊科和重症监护病房进行了一项非盲前瞻性观察研究。研究对象为便利抽样选取的上腔静脉-心房交界处有中心静脉导管的成年患者。超声测量剑突下、髂上和腹部中部的IVC横径和纵径,分别在吸气末和呼气末进行测量。采用相关性和回归分析来关联CVP和IVC直径。

结果

共有72名受试者,平均年龄67岁(范围21 - 94岁),其中37名(53%)为男性,研究历时9个月。7名患有三尖瓣病变的受试者被排除。主要诊断为:呼吸衰竭12例(18%),脓毒症11例(17%),胰腺炎3例(5%)。28例(43%)患者接受机械通气。剑突下视图可获得足够测量值的有57例(89%),腹部中部视图为44例(68%),髂上视图为28例(43%)。剑突下吸气末纵向视图、中点视图和髂上视图的相关系数分别在0.49(95%置信区间[CI] 0.26 - 0.66)、0.51(95% CI 0.23 - 0.71)和0.50(95% CI 0.14 - 0.74),具有统计学意义。横径值的相关系数分别在0.42(95% CI 0.18 - 0.61)、0.38(95% CI 0.09 - 0.61)和0.67(95% CI 0.40 - 0.84),具有统计学意义。呼气末测量值相似或显著性略低。

结论

剑突下是三个解剖位置中观察最可靠的;然而,髂上视图与CVP的相关性更佳。纵向视图总体上优于横向视图。IVC的简单超声测量与CVP的相关性较弱。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验