Department of Neurosurgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675 Munich, Germany.
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2012 Feb;154(2):305-12. doi: 10.1007/s00701-011-1224-x. Epub 2011 Dec 27.
Transarticular screw fixation is seen as the "gold standard" in instrumented fusion of C1 and C2. However, drawbacks are the necessity of a reduction before instrumentation and a risk of vertebral artery injury. Therefore, C1 lateral mass and C2 isthmic screws are an alternative. The present study assessed the feasibility of C1-2 stabilization with C1 lateral mass and C2 isthmic screws and evaluated quality of life.
All data of 35 consecutive patients treated from May 2006 to September 2009 were collected. Patients had C1 lateral mass and C2 isthmic screws.
Twenty patients were operated on for traumatic instabilities, six for neoplastic instabilities, five for infectious instabilities and two each for degenerative and congenital instabilities. Sixty-six of 70 C1 screws had an ideal position, while four were placed suboptimal without the need for revision. Twelve of 68 C2 screws were not ideal but acceptable; one screw needed a surgical revision. There was one non-surgery related case of neurological deterioration after multilevel instrumentation. No vascular injuries occurred. Realignment was correct in all patients. After a median follow-up of 12 months, patients showed a reduction of pain, disability and improvements in EQ-5D items. SF36 data compared with a normative population and a historical cohort showed lower levels of function in all domains.
C1-C2 instrumented fusion with lateral mass and isthmic screws is a safe procedure. Sufficient screw position and alignment was possible in all cases. Therefore, at our institution transarticular screws were abandoned in favor of C1 lateral mass and C2 isthmic screws.
经关节螺钉固定被视为 C1 和 C2 经器械融合的“金标准”。然而,其缺点是在器械固定前需要进行复位,且存在椎动脉损伤的风险。因此,C1 侧块和 C2 峡部螺钉成为了一种替代方法。本研究评估了 C1-2 采用 C1 侧块和 C2 峡部螺钉固定的可行性,并评估了生活质量。
收集了 2006 年 5 月至 2009 年 9 月连续治疗的 35 例患者的所有数据。患者采用 C1 侧块和 C2 峡部螺钉。
20 例患者因创伤性不稳定而接受手术,6 例因肿瘤性不稳定而接受手术,5 例因感染性不稳定而接受手术,2 例因退行性和先天性不稳定而接受手术。70 枚 C1 螺钉中有 66 枚位置理想,4 枚位置不理想但无需修正。68 枚 C2 螺钉中有 12 枚位置不理想但可接受,1 枚螺钉需要手术修正。有 1 例非手术相关的多节段器械后神经恶化病例。未发生血管损伤。所有患者均正确对线。在中位数为 12 个月的随访中,患者疼痛、残疾减轻,EQ-5D 项目改善。SF36 数据与正态人群和历史队列相比,所有领域的功能水平均较低。
C1-C2 经器械融合采用侧块和峡部螺钉是一种安全的方法。所有病例均能获得足够的螺钉位置和对线。因此,在我们的机构中,经关节螺钉被放弃,转而采用 C1 侧块和 C2 峡部螺钉。