Hudson Daniel W, Holzmueller Christine G, Pronovost Peter J, Gianci Sebastiana J, Pate Zack T, Wahr Joyce, Heitmiller Eugenie S, Thompson David A, Martinez Elizabeth A, Marsteller Jill A, Gurses Ayse P, Lubomski Lisa H, Goeschel Christine A, Pham Julius Cuong
US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Rockville, MD, USA.
Am J Med Qual. 2012 May-Jun;27(3):201-9. doi: 10.1177/1062860611421981. Epub 2011 Dec 27.
Health care has primarily used retrospective review approaches to identify and mitigate hazards, with little evidence of measurable and sustained improvements in patient safety. Conversely, the nuclear power industry has used a prospective peer-to-peer (P2P) assessment process grounded in open information exchange and cooperative organizational learning to realize substantial and sustainable improvements in safety. In comparing approaches, it is evident that health care's sluggish progress stems from weaknesses in hazard identification and mitigation and in organizational learning. This article proposes creating and implementing a structured prospective P2P assessment model in health care, similar to that used in the nuclear power industry, to accelerate improvements in patient safety.
医疗保健主要采用回顾性审查方法来识别和减轻风险,但几乎没有证据表明患者安全得到了可衡量的持续改善。相反,核电行业采用了基于开放信息交流和合作组织学习的前瞻性点对点(P2P)评估过程,以实现安全方面的实质性和可持续改进。在比较不同方法时,很明显医疗保健进展缓慢源于风险识别与减轻以及组织学习方面的弱点。本文提议在医疗保健领域创建并实施一种结构化的前瞻性P2P评估模型,类似于核电行业所使用的模型,以加速患者安全方面的改进。