*Center for Surgical Trials and Outcomes Research, Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD †Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD ‡Department of Surgery, Howard University College of Medicine, Washington, DC.
Ann Surg. 2013 Oct;258(4):572-9; discussion 579-81. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182a50148.
To determine whether minority trauma patients are more commonly treated at trauma centers (TCs) with worse observed-to-expected (O/E) survival.
Racial disparities in survival after traumatic injury have been described. However, the mechanisms that lead to these inequities are not well understood.
Analysis of level I/II TCs included in the National Trauma Data Bank 2007-2010. White, Black, and Hispanic patients 16 years or older sustaining blunt/penetrating injuries with an Injury Severity Score of 9 or more were included. TCs with 50% or more Hispanic or Black patients were classified as predominantly minority TCs. Multivariate logistic regression adjusting for several patient/injury characteristics was used to predict the expected number of deaths for each TC. O/E mortality ratios were then generated and used to rank individual TCs as low (O/E <1), intermediate, or high mortality (O/E >1).
A total of 556,720 patients from 181 TCs were analyzed; 86 TCs (48%) were classified as low mortality, 6 (3%) intermediate, and 89 (49%) as high mortality. More of the predominantly minority TCs [(82% (22/27) vs 44% (67/154)] were classified as high mortality (P < 0.001). Approximately 64% of Black patients (55,673/87,575) were treated at high-mortality TCs compared with 54% Hispanics (32,677/60,761) and 41% Whites (165,494/408,384) (P < 0.001).
Minority trauma patients are clustered at hospitals with significantly higher-than-expected mortality. Black and Hispanic patients treated at low-mortality hospitals have a significantly lower odds of death than similar patients treated at high-mortality hospitals. Differences in TC outcomes and quality of care may partially explain trauma outcomes disparities.
确定少数民族创伤患者是否更常在创伤中心(TCs)接受治疗,其观察到的与预期的(O/E)生存率更差。
已经描述了创伤后生存的种族差异。然而,导致这些不平等的机制尚不清楚。
分析 2007-2010 年国家创伤数据库中包括的一级/二级 TCs。纳入年龄在 16 岁及以上、损伤严重程度评分(ISS)为 9 或更高的钝性/穿透性损伤的白种人、黑人和西班牙裔患者。将 Hispanic 或 Black 患者比例达到 50%或以上的 TCs 归类为主要少数民族 TCs。使用多变量逻辑回归调整了几个患者/损伤特征,以预测每个 TC 的预期死亡人数。然后生成 O/E 死亡率比值,并用于将单个 TC 分为低(O/E<1)、中或高死亡率(O/E>1)。
共分析了来自 181 个 TC 的 556720 名患者;86 个 TC(48%)被归类为低死亡率,6 个(3%)为中死亡率,89 个(49%)为高死亡率。更多的主要少数民族 TC(82%(22/27)vs.44%(67/154))被归类为高死亡率(P<0.001)。与 Hispanic(32,677/60761)和 White(165,494/408384)患者相比,黑人患者中有约 64%(55673/87575)在高死亡率 TC 中接受治疗(P<0.001)。
少数民族创伤患者集中在死亡率明显高于预期的医院。在低死亡率医院接受治疗的黑人和西班牙裔患者与在高死亡率医院接受治疗的类似患者相比,死亡的可能性显著降低。TC 结果和护理质量的差异可能部分解释了创伤结果的差异。