• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大小、年龄和组成:作为瘿蚊(双翅目:瘿蚊科)多样性预测指标的植物类群特征

Size, age and composition: characteristics of plant taxa as diversity predictors of gall-midges (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae).

作者信息

Araújo Walter S

机构信息

Pós-Graduação em Ecologia e Evolução, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Goás, Campus Samambaia, 74001-970 Goiânia, Goiás, CP 131 Brazil.

出版信息

Rev Biol Trop. 2011 Dec;59(4):1599-607. doi: 10.15517/rbt.v59i4.3423.

DOI:10.15517/rbt.v59i4.3423
PMID:22208077
Abstract

Many hypotheses have been proposed to explain the diversity of gall-midge insects (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae), some of them taking into account plant diversity. This study aims to test the importance of size, age and composition of host plant taxa in the diversity of Cecidomyiidae. For this we used inventories data on the diversity of galling and host plants in Brazil. We found that Asterales, Myrtales and Malpighiales, were the most important orders, with 34, 33 and 25, gall morphotypes, respectively. The most representative host families were Asteraceae (34 morphotypes), Myrtaceae (23) and Fabaceae (22). In general, the order size and the plant family were good predictors of the galling diversity, but not the taxon age. The most diverse host genera for gall-midges were Mikania, Eugenia and Styrax, with 15, 13 and nine galler species, respectively. The size of plant genera showed no significant relationship with the richness of Cecidomyiidae, contrary to the prediction of the plant taxon size hypothesis. The plant genera with the greatest diversity of galling insects are not necessarily those with the greatest number of species. These results indicate that some plant taxa have a high intrinsic richness of galling insects, suggesting that the plant species composition may be equally or more important for the diversity of gall-midges than the size or age of the host taxon.

摘要

人们已经提出了许多假说,以解释瘿蚊昆虫(双翅目:瘿蚊科)的多样性,其中一些假说考虑到了植物多样性。本研究旨在检验寄主植物类群的大小、年龄和组成对瘿蚊科多样性的重要性。为此,我们使用了巴西瘿蚊和寄主植物多样性的清查数据。我们发现,菊目、桃金娘目和金虎尾目是最重要的目,分别有34、33和25种瘿蚊形态类型。最具代表性的寄主科是菊科(34种形态类型)、桃金娘科(23种)和豆科(22种)。一般来说,目大小和植物科是瘿蚊多样性的良好预测指标,但不是分类单元年龄。瘿蚊最多样化的寄主属是薇甘菊属、番樱桃属和安息香属,分别有15、13和9种瘿蚊物种。与植物分类单元大小假说的预测相反,植物属的大小与瘿蚊科的丰富度没有显著关系。具有最多样化瘿蚊昆虫的植物属不一定是物种数量最多的属。这些结果表明,一些植物类群具有较高的瘿蚊昆虫固有丰富度,这表明植物物种组成对瘿蚊多样性的重要性可能与寄主分类单元的大小或年龄相当或更重要。

相似文献

1
Size, age and composition: characteristics of plant taxa as diversity predictors of gall-midges (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae).大小、年龄和组成:作为瘿蚊(双翅目:瘿蚊科)多样性预测指标的植物类群特征
Rev Biol Trop. 2011 Dec;59(4):1599-607. doi: 10.15517/rbt.v59i4.3423.
2
Insect galls of Restinga de Marambaia (Barra de Guaratiba, Rio de Janeiro, RJ).马兰巴亚海岸(里约热内卢州瓜拉蒂巴海滩)的昆虫瘿
Braz J Biol. 2016 Apr 19;76(3):787-95. doi: 10.1590/1519-6984.05314.
3
Insect galls from Serra de São José (Tiradentes, MG, Brazil).来自圣若泽山脉(巴西米纳斯吉拉斯州蒂拉登特斯)的昆虫瘿。
Braz J Biol. 2004 Aug;64(3A):423-45. doi: 10.1590/s1519-69842004000300007.
4
Diversity of gall-inducing insects in the high altitude wetland forests in Pernambuco, Northeastern Brazil.巴西东北部伯南布哥州高海拔湿地森林中致瘿昆虫的多样性
Braz J Biol. 2011 Feb;71(1):47-56. doi: 10.1590/s1519-69842011000100008.
5
The genus Dasineura Rondani, 1840 (Diptera, Cecidomyiidae) in Brazil.巴西的达西纽拉属(Dasineura),1840年(双翅目,瘿蚊科)
Braz J Biol. 2013 Nov;73(4):801-7. doi: 10.1590/s1519-69842013000400017.
6
Diversity of insect galls associated with coastal shrub vegetation in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.巴西里约热内卢沿海灌木植被相关昆虫瘿的多样性。
An Acad Bras Cienc. 2016 Sep;88(3):1407-18. doi: 10.1590/0001-3765201620150658.
7
Occurrence and characterization of entomogenic galls in an area of Cerrado sensu stricto and Gallery forest of the state of Bahia, Brazil.巴西巴伊亚州严格意义上的塞拉多地区和廊道森林中昆虫源虫瘿的发生与特征
An Acad Bras Cienc. 2018 Jul-Sep;90(3):2903-2919. doi: 10.1590/0001-3765201820170522.
8
Plant-galling insect interactions: a data set of host plants and their gall-inducing insects for the Cerrado.植物致瘤昆虫相互作用:塞拉多地区的寄主植物及其诱导昆虫数据集。
Ecology. 2020 Nov;101(11):e03149. doi: 10.1002/ecy.3149. Epub 2020 Aug 29.
9
An overview of inventories of gall-inducing insects in Brazil: looking for patterns and identifying knowledge gaps.巴西致瘿昆虫名录概述:探寻规律并识别知识空白。
An Acad Bras Cienc. 2019 Mar 21;91(1):e20180162. doi: 10.1590/0001-3765201920180162.
10
Island phytophagy: explaining the remarkable diversity of plant-feeding insects.岛屿食叶性:阐释植物食虫昆虫的显著多样性。
Proc Biol Sci. 2012 Aug 22;279(1741):3250-5. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2012.0397. Epub 2012 May 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Are dominant plant species more susceptible to leaf-mining insects? A case study at Saihanwula Nature Reserve, China.优势植物物种是否更容易受到潜叶昆虫的侵害?以中国赛罕乌拉自然保护区为例的一项研究。
Ecol Evol. 2018 Jul 9;8(15):7633-7648. doi: 10.1002/ece3.4284. eCollection 2018 Aug.
2
Global pattern of plant utilization across different organisms: Does plant apparency or plant phylogeny matter?不同生物对植物利用的全球模式:植物的易见性还是植物系统发育更重要?
Ecol Evol. 2017 Mar 14;7(8):2535-2545. doi: 10.1002/ece3.2882. eCollection 2017 Apr.