Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Jul 1;83(3):814-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.09.001. Epub 2011 Dec 28.
To evaluate treatment results and prognostic factors, especially margin status and molecular subtype, in early-stage breast cancer patients treated with breast conservation therapy (BCT).
The records of 1,058 Stage I or II breast cancer patients treated with BCT (surgical excision plus radiotherapy) at Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, from 1985-2005 were retrospectively reviewed. Conventional receptor analyses were used as surrogate markers for molecular subtype classification (luminal A, luminal B, Her2 positive, and basal like). Actuarial estimates of overall survival (OS), cause-specific survival (CSS), failure-free survival, and locoregional control (LRC) were computed by use of Kaplan-Meier plots. We analyzed prognostic variables for significance using Cox proportional hazards univariate and multivariate analysis. The study was approved by the Duke University Medical Center Institutional Review Board.
The median age of the patients was 56 years (range, 18-89 years). Of the patients, 80% had T1 disease and 66% N0 disease pathologically. With a median follow-up of 9.8 years, an in-breast recurrence developed in 53 patients and 10 patients had nodal failure. For all patients, the 10-year CSS rate was 94%; LRC rate, 94%; and failure-free survival rate, 88%. Luminal A patients had a CSS rate of 95% and LRC rate of 99%. Basal-type patients appeared to do worse, with regard to both CSS rate (74%) and LRC rate (76%), but the numbers were small and the difference was not statistically significant. LRC rates of patients with negative margins (widely negative, close, and extent of margin not known) were virtually identical (93%, 96%, and 94%, respectively). Those with positive margins appeared to fare slightly worse based on LRC rate (88%), but again, the numbers were small and the difference was not statistically significant.
BCT remains the treatment of choice for early-stage breast cancer patients irrespective of molecular subtype. Negative margins of excision are desirable, but the width of the negative margin does not influence outcome.
评估保乳治疗(BCT)治疗早期乳腺癌患者的治疗结果和预后因素,尤其是边缘状态和分子亚型。
回顾性分析北卡罗来纳州达勒姆市杜克大学医学中心 1985 年至 2005 年期间接受 BCT(手术切除加放疗)治疗的 1058 例 I 期或 II 期乳腺癌患者的记录。常规受体分析被用作分子亚型分类(管腔 A、管腔 B、Her2 阳性和基底样)的替代标志物。通过 Kaplan-Meier 图计算总生存(OS)、无病生存、无失败生存和局部区域控制(LRC)的生存估计。使用 Cox 比例风险单因素和多因素分析分析预后变量的显著性。该研究得到了杜克大学医学中心机构审查委员会的批准。
患者的中位年龄为 56 岁(范围为 18-89 岁)。80%的患者病理上为 T1 疾病,66%为 N0 疾病。中位随访 9.8 年后,53 例患者发生乳房内复发,10 例患者发生淋巴结失败。所有患者的 10 年 CSS 率为 94%;LRC 率为 94%;无失败生存率为 88%。管腔 A 患者的 CSS 率为 95%,LRC 率为 99%。基底样患者的 CSS 率(74%)和 LRC 率(76%)似乎较差,但数量较少,差异无统计学意义。边缘阴性(广泛阴性、接近和边缘范围未知)患者的 LRC 率几乎相同(93%、96%和 94%)。边缘阳性患者的 LRC 率(88%)似乎略差,但同样,数量较少,差异无统计学意义。
BCT 仍然是早期乳腺癌患者的治疗选择,无论分子亚型如何。切除的阴性边缘是理想的,但阴性边缘的宽度不影响结果。