Suppr超能文献

体质量指数对每日图像引导辅助放疗治疗子宫内膜癌患者摆位误差程度的影响。

Effect of body mass index on magnitude of setup errors in patients treated with adjuvant radiotherapy for endometrial cancer with daily image guidance.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.

出版信息

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Jun 1;83(2):670-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.07.026. Epub 2011 Dec 28.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To determine the impact of body mass index (BMI) on daily setup variations and frequency of imaging necessary for patients with endometrial cancer treated with adjuvant intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with daily image guidance.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The daily shifts from a total of 782 orthogonal kilovoltage images from 30 patients who received pelvic IMRT between July 2008 and August 2010 were analyzed. The BMI, mean daily shifts, and random and systematic errors in each translational and rotational direction were calculated for each patient. Margin recipes were generated based on BMI. Linear regression and spearman rank correlation analysis were performed. To simulate a less-than-daily IGRT protocol, the average shift of the first five fractions was applied to subsequent setups without IGRT for assessing the impact on setup error and margin requirements.

RESULTS

Median BMI was 32.9 (range, 23-62). Of the 30 patients, 16.7% (n = 5) were normal weight (BMI <25); 23.3% (n = 7) were overweight (BMI ≥ 25 to <30); 26.7% (n = 8) were mildly obese (BMI ≥ 30 to <35); and 33.3% (n = 10) were moderately to severely obese (BMI ≥ 35). On linear regression, mean absolute vertical, longitudinal, and lateral shifts positively correlated with BMI (p = 0.0127, p = 0.0037, and p < 0.0001, respectively). Systematic errors in the longitudinal and vertical direction were found to be positively correlated with BMI category (p < 0.0001 for both). IGRT for the first five fractions, followed by correction of the mean error for all subsequent fractions, led to a substantial reduction in setup error and resultant margin requirement overall compared with no IGRT.

CONCLUSIONS

Daily shifts, systematic errors, and margin requirements were greatest in obese patients. For women who are normal or overweight, a planning target margin margin of 7 to 10 mm may be sufficient without IGRT, but for patients who are moderately or severely obese, this is insufficient.

摘要

目的

确定体质量指数(BMI)对接受每日图像引导辅助调强放疗(IMRT)的子宫内膜癌患者的日常治疗摆位变化和成像频率的影响。

方法和材料

分析了 2008 年 7 月至 2010 年 8 月期间接受盆腔 IMRT 的 30 例患者的总共 782 个正交千伏图像的每日位移。计算了每位患者的 BMI、每日平均位移以及每个平移和旋转方向的随机和系统误差。根据 BMI 生成了边缘处方。进行了线性回归和斯皮尔曼等级相关分析。为了模拟少于每日 IGRT 的方案,将前五次分次的平均位移应用于没有 IGRT 的后续分次,以评估对设置误差和边缘要求的影响。

结果

中位 BMI 为 32.9(范围:23-62)。在 30 例患者中,16.7%(n=5)为正常体重(BMI<25);23.3%(n=7)为超重(BMI≥25 至<30);26.7%(n=8)为轻度肥胖(BMI≥30 至<35);33.3%(n=10)为中度至重度肥胖(BMI≥35)。线性回归显示,垂直、纵向和横向的平均绝对位移与 BMI 呈正相关(p=0.0127、p=0.0037 和 p<0.0001)。纵向和垂直方向的系统误差与 BMI 类别呈正相关(两者均为 p<0.0001)。与不进行 IGRT 相比,前五次分次进行 IGRT,然后对所有后续分次的平均误差进行校正,可显著降低整体摆位误差和所需的边缘要求。

结论

肥胖患者的日常位移、系统误差和边缘要求最大。对于正常体重或超重的女性,在没有 IGRT 的情况下,7 至 10mm 的计划靶区边缘可能足够,但对于中度或重度肥胖的患者,这是不够的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验